Freedom of Speech edited out by Mod
Thing is why would you want to water cool the GTX 680 there is no point they are already cool and quite and water will not net anymore performance so ...
The 680GTX just hit the market you need to allow the water block makers time to catch up, sometimes not always the first available will be the best performing block anyway.
My 2 cents! Ryan
The GTX 680 is already clocked at over 1ghz stock it's not getting any faster on liquid period there is no room for improvement before the card hits the architectural limits it's not even about heat cause the sock cooling offers OCing head room galore but it just the physical limits 1ghz stock man that very very high already.
and a violation of Tom's rules - as this has to be verified or resulting in penalty (if my memory serves me well)Simply suggesting that something is or is not possible based on personal opinion is not a valid basis for debate.
Thing is why would you want to water cool the GTX 680 there is no point they are already cool and quite and water will not net anymore performance so ...
Some cards do not need to be water cooled maybe OP was under the impression that GTX 680 needs to be water cooled and I saved him a few bucks ... and thanks for throwing the book at me real mature ;-)