Tom's Hardware > Forum > Homebuilt Systems > New System Build > [Solved] DDR3 2000 for new i7 920 build?

[Solved] DDR3 2000 for new i7 920 build?

Forum Homebuilt Systems : New System Build - [Solved] DDR3 2000 for new i7 920 build?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!

Best answer from kleinberg.

Word :    Username :           
 

Hey guys,

I have been stressing looking over a few different ram kits for my upcoming i7 920 build.

I guess my first question is is DDR3 2000 worth it? There are a few kits out there that cost relatively the same as many of the DDR3 1600 kits.

Here is what I was looking at

DDR3 2000 G.Skill Ripjaw Cas 9
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6820231306

Mushkin DDR3 2000 Cas 8
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6820226057

The reviews on these kits are basically non existent. Am I better off just going with some DDR3 1600 cas7 kit? I have a budget around 200 dollars.

Thanks!

I would just do the math:

9 CAS @ 2000mhz = 4.5 microseconds actual latency
8 CAS @ 2000 = 4.0

7 CAS @ 1600 = 4.3
6 CAS @ 1600 = 3.7

So an 8 at 2000 is actually slightly better than 7 at 1600, as far as timings. But at the end of the day, no, none of this will make much of a measureable difference, much less a noticeable one. Changes in CPU speeds will drown out any of these differences in memory, so just pick a rough "best" of the ones that are actually available and don't sweat it.
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

The timings are too high. Better off with 1600. Look for 7-7-7-28 or something near there

------------------------------ [LG 23' GTG 1080p][Antec 902][PII X4 955][Gigabyte 790FX-UD5P][Sapphire 5770][Mushkin Redline 1600 4GB][Xigmatek S1283][Corsair 650HX]
Reply to BohleyK

Here's an article talking about memory speeds for DDR2: http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] cies,1236. There's a similar one for DDR3, but I can't seem to find it right now. Basically, the conclusions were that the DDR3-2000 kits had too slow timings and didn't help except in very specific situations like WinRAR. In games, the differences were 1-2%, and it actually depended on the game as to whether faster timing/1333 or 2000 kits resulted in better frame rates.

This is definitely one of those areas where if you have to ask, you don't need it (even if you're a hardcore gamer). The differences in performance are small, and unless you have very specific needs (I'm a photographer dealing with 200 photoshop files a day and I need my RAM to do x), you're not going to be able to even tell the difference. If it were me, I would go with the faster timings on a 1600 kit.

Reply to kleinberg

I guess my question is why go for DDR3 1600 when DDR3 2000 are similary prices? Will the timings make a more noticeable difference?

Also can someone reccomend some good DDR3 1600 kits with decent times? I wanted that CAS6 Mushkin but it has been out of stock for a while.

Reply to toastyy
Best answer

I would just do the math:

9 CAS @ 2000mhz = 4.5 microseconds actual latency
8 CAS @ 2000 = 4.0

7 CAS @ 1600 = 4.3
6 CAS @ 1600 = 3.7

So an 8 at 2000 is actually slightly better than 7 at 1600, as far as timings. But at the end of the day, no, none of this will make much of a measureable difference, much less a noticeable one. Changes in CPU speeds will drown out any of these differences in memory, so just pick a rough "best" of the ones that are actually available and don't sweat it.

Reply to kleinberg
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Homebuilt Systems > New System Build > [Solved] DDR3 2000 for new i7 920 build?
Go to:

There are 843 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them