Can anyone tell me why I seem to be getting low FPS. I may be expecting to much but I feel like with the GTX 295 my games should be running better. My system is below.. Do you think I have a bottleneck?? Any suggestions welcome..
gbyte p45 UD3R
Q9650 @ 3.2ghz
EVGA GTX 295
4x1 GB Kingston HyperX pc2-8500 @ 1066 5-5-5-15
Raptor 150 gb main drive
pc power and cooling 750 silencer
A Q9550 didn't seem to be a bottleneck in the majority of the cases. Except with GTA, Crysis, Far Cry 2, and Stalker. Well, I guess it did bottleneck at 1920 most of the time over a core i7
A Q9550 didn't seem to be a bottleneck in the majority of the cases. Except with GTA, Crysis, Far Cry 2, and Stalker. Well, I guess it did bottleneck at 1920 most of the time over a core i7
------------------------------i7 920 @ 3.2 GHz w/Cooler Master V8,
OCZ Platinum DDR3 1600 MHz 8-8-8-24, Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2,
Samsung Spinpoint F3 500 GB, Corsair HX1000 Watt PSU,
Intel DX58SO, Cooler Master Storm Sniper mid-tower, Windows 7 Professional 64 bit
Reply to mortonww
I understand this part, but still I thought the GTX 295 was designed to run everything pretty much full? When i turn down the AA doesn't seem to make that much difference.
would I see any gain by throwing a GTX 260 in the case as well to do physix or would that be overkill alongside the gtx 295. I already own the 260 so wouldn't cost anything...
I'm watching the FPS on the EVGA precision while gaming. the games look fine to play guess I'm just over analyzing. Actually gaming looks great... I'm just one of those people that want to make sure its maximized. Don't want to be gaming at 40fps if I'm supposed to be getting 80fps.
One thing you can do is turn the eye candy off and see if your FPS goes up and drop the resolution to see if that brings the FPS up. If neither does then the GPU is definitely not slowing things down.
Hi, i know this says "SOLVED" already but here is the deal. Your expectation is a bit reaching. When games say high or maximum settings, that does not include settings for AA and AF. Playing MW2 (not much more taxing than COD4) at 1920 is going to look great and play great with your setup at maximum in-game graphics settings. Turning on AF shouldn't cause barely a hit, you should still get over 60 fps.
However, when turning on high level AA the 295 simply cannot handle this, and many other high end games. Remember, the 295 is simply 2x 275's and while Nvidia does decent AA, they've always had performance problems beyond 4x.
If you drop down to 4x or 2x AA, you will get the performance you are expecting. Are you losing much by doing this? Not really because you are already playing at a high resolution which mitigates aliasing to a degree on its own. Simply put, there is no reason for you to be running 16x AA, and certainly no reason to expect that 16x AA would not cause a horrific performance drop. I'm surprised that you get 40fps with that on.
I'm watching the FPS on the EVGA precision while gaming. the games look fine to play guess I'm just over analyzing. Actually gaming looks great... I'm just one of those people that want to make sure its maximized. Don't want to be gaming at 40fps if I'm supposed to be getting 80fps.
I know what you mean! I have gigabyte gtx 295, core i5 750 and in most games, like far cry 2, fallout 3 i get about 40-60 fps, but i know i shoul get about 80fps. Thats why i bought expensive card, to get maximum in all games.
I am not unsatisfied, but i should get far more fps!
Well turned off all of my eye candy and just let the in-game setup do the 4x. I was getting into the 140fps and such in different scenes. Also I ran the PCmark Vantage and getting 19924 as my score. After comparing to other benchmarks with same setup I seem to be getting what I should. Thanks to everyone for suggestions and time on this thread. I'm going to quit maximizing and ENJOY!!