S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Prypiat benchmark,post your results

36 answers Last reply
More about call prypiat benchmark post results
  1. Your numbers a bit whacked monkey? Ok you're at 1920x1080 compared to my 1680x1050 but still..



    Got my phenom II 940 at stock and a 4770 at stock right now.

    Edit, I guess it's quad vs duo...still seems way off though.
  2. Just redid it on ultra, scoring about 30fps less on average. The benchmarks would appear to be completely cpu bound.
  3. I would do tests, but not point. I'm currently running a 17" monitor (My 22" broke:() with 3 285s lol.

    Q9450 @ 3.8 ghz, I think it will be super bottlenecked.

    I'll wait till I get my Fermi or 5890.
  4. jennyh said:
    Your numbers a bit whacked monkey? Ok you're at 1920x1080 compared to my 1680x1050 but still..

    http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/9017/stalkerbench.png

    Got my phenom II 940 at stock and a 4770 at stock right now.

    Edit, I guess it's quad vs duo...still seems way off though.

    Higher res on two year old cards and it's still at playable frame rates, so no, the numbers aren't whacked at all. Why did you not post the result from your 5850 by the way?
  5. Lol talk about mr defensive.

    Your 8800's should be way ahead of a single 4770 so that argument is a non starter. The extra pixels? Sure it's hurting but not that much.

    It's a cpu bound bench and I'm certain more quad cores will throw up similar results.
  6. Windows 7 RC 32-bit for me. It has to be the quad vs the duo, that's the only thing that makes sense to me.
  7. jennyh said:
    Lol talk about mr defensive.

    Your 8800's should be way ahead of a single 4770 so that argument is a non starter. The extra pixels? Sure it's hurting but not that much.

    It's a cpu bound bench and I'm certain more quad cores will throw up similar results.

    Sorry Mrs Bolshy, I'll run on the Quad later.
  8. Why are there two amd_demo.db files in the \resources folder and no Nvidia or Intel files, does this mean that this benchmark is biased towards AMD/ATi?
  9. So the Stalker series finally moves past only supporting one cpu core...it's about time. Will try the benchmark soon, is it DX11 ??
  10. Nope, as long as it doesnt say if/nvidia 0
  11. Yes, its DX11 and is why it has ATI singled out Im sure, tho havnt seen that particular code
  12. Lol mby it is.

    Q6600 @ 3.4ghz + 4870



    I'd say quad core looks favourite.
  13. Pretty strange though, the Phenom II @ 3ghz with a 4770 outperforms the Q6600 @ 3.4ghz, with a 4870. I see this in games like WoW also.
  14. Just downloaded it from that site, but what the heck am I supposed to open it with ???
  15. Thanks mouse man
  16. You're welcome mate.
  17. I tested with Ultra,Extreme and High settings with these as other settings:
    Resolution:1920x1200
    Renderer:Enhanced Full dyn lightning DX10
    MSAA: Off
    MSAA for A-tested objects: DX 10.0 style(default)
    SSAO mode:HDAO
    SSAO Quality:High
    DX10.1

    Ultra:
    http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/th.20b5b9f9cb.jpg
    Extreme:
    http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/th.554af892ca.jpg

    High:
    http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/th.309ad9766a.jpg
  18. Maziar said:
    I tested with Ultra,Extreme and High settings with these as other settings:
    Resolution:1920x1200
    Renderer:Enhanced Full dyn lightning DX10
    MSAA: Off
    MSAA for A-tested objects: DX 10.0 style(default)
    SSAO mode:HDAO
    SSAO Quality:High
    DX10.1

    Ultra:
    http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/th.20b5b9f9cb.jpg
    Extreme:
    http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/th.554af892ca.jpg

    High:
    http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/th.309ad9766a.jpg

    It's interesting how your results are pretty comparable to mine mate.
  19. Hmm can you try running it at 1680x1050 to see if that is making such a huge difference?
  20. jennyh said:
    Hmm can you try running it at 1680x1050 to see if that is making such a huge difference?

    Will do tomorrow :)
  21. There is something pretty strange going on here.

    Using Maziar's settings (all except 1920x1080 res), I got this on my Q6600 @ 3.4ghz -



    I'm thinking either windows 7 RC or the newest catalyst drivers might be putting it out of whack.
  22. Mousemonkey said:
    It's interesting how your results are pretty comparable to mine mate.
    http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/808/callofpripyatbenchmarkh.jpg

    yes they are close,are your "Advanced settings" same as mine too ?
    BTW mouse plz check your PM :)
  23. Thing is it's 2 different pc's. The only thing they have in common is windows 7 RC and the latest catalyst driver.
  24. All these results look a bit goofy to me. Mine were great, but rather unflattering compared to some people who have posted their results, and my system might be the best one here. I just can't wait for the game to come out in the USA so we can test in- game performance.
  25. Here are the 1680x1050 results as requested :)
    http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/th.d620e7b3bc.jpg
  26. I think there is probably something wrong with the benchmark tbh.
  27. Maybe,its possible
  28. jennyh said:
    Thing is it's 2 different pc's. The only thing they have in common is windows 7 RC and the latest catalyst driver.

    So whose numbers a bit whacked then?
  29. None of them make sense but mine appear to be 'more whacked' than anybody elses, yes. :p
  30. jennyh said:
    None of them make sense but mine appear to be 'more whacked' than anybody elses, yes. :p

    But have you sussed out why?, is this benchie the similar to the first game in so much as you may have to install it several times to make it work right?
  31. I didn't acutally watch the benchmark, I went to get a cup of tea each time. I ran it again and paid attention and tbh it looks really quite crappy. Boxy buildings with hardly any shadows, sometimes the shadows disappear on models.

    It looks as if it is locked on lowest settings, however I did run it at lowest settings and scored even higher fps :p
  32. No i didn't, shooters aren't really my thing. Mass effect was good though and i liked Fallout 3.

    On this benchmark, I thought it was just the 'medium' settings causing the high fps. I'll try reinstalling it.
  33. Same thing after the reinstall, I even ran fraps same time and it's still at 200-300 fps. It looks more like a valve game though, boxy looking buildings. At one point a shadow on a model just sorta disappears.

    I tried taking a screenshot but it wont allow it during the benchmark. Weird. :p It has to be the new catalyst surely.
Ask a new question

Read More

Graphics Cards Download Benchmark Graphics