S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Prypiat benchmark,post your results

[Maziar]

Download from here:
http://www.fileshack.com/file.x/15773/S.T.A.L.K.E.R.:+Call+of+Pripyat+Benchmark

And post your results.

 

[Mousemonkey]

 

[jennyh]

Your numbers a bit whacked monkey? Ok you're at 1920x1080 compared to my 1680x1050 but still..

Got my phenom II 940 at stock and a 4770 at stock right now.

Edit, I guess it's quad vs duo...still seems way off though.

 

[jennyh]

Just redid it on ultra, scoring about 30fps less on average. The benchmarks would appear to be completely cpu bound.

 

[L1qu1d]

I would do tests, but not point. I'm currently running a 17" monitor (My 22" broke) with 3 285s lol.

Q9450 @ 3.8 ghz, I think it will be super bottlenecked.

I'll wait till I get my Fermi or 5890.

 

[Mousemonkey]

Your numbers a bit whacked monkey? Ok you're at 1920x1080 compared to my 1680x1050 but still..

http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/9017/stalkerbench.png

Got my phenom II 940 at stock and a 4770 at stock right now.

Edit, I guess it's quad vs duo...still seems way off though.

Higher res on two year old cards and it's still at playable frame rates, so no, the numbers aren't whacked at all. Why did you not post the result from your 5850 by the way?

 

[jennyh]

Lol talk about mr defensive.

Your 8800's should be way ahead of a single 4770 so that argument is a non starter. The extra pixels? Sure it's hurting but not that much.

It's a cpu bound bench and I'm certain more quad cores will throw up similar results.

 

[jennyh]

Windows 7 RC 32-bit for me. It has to be the quad vs the duo, that's the only thing that makes sense to me.

 

[Mousemonkey]

Lol talk about mr defensive.

Your 8800's should be way ahead of a single 4770 so that argument is a non starter. The extra pixels? Sure it's hurting but not that much.

It's a cpu bound bench and I'm certain more quad cores will throw up similar results.

Sorry Mrs Bolshy, I'll run on the Quad later.

 

[Mousemonkey]

Why are there two amd_demo.db files in the \resources folder and no Nvidia or Intel files, does this mean that this benchmark is biased towards AMD/ATi?

 

[Annisman]

So the Stalker series finally moves past only supporting one cpu core...it's about time. Will try the benchmark soon, is it DX11 ??

 

[JAYDEEJOHN]

Nope, as long as it doesnt say if/nvidia 0

 

[JAYDEEJOHN]

Yes, its DX11 and is why it has ATI singled out Im sure, tho havnt seen that particular code

 

[jennyh]

Lol mby it is.

Q6600 @ 3.4ghz + 4870

I'd say quad core looks favourite.

 

[jennyh]

Pretty strange though, the Phenom II @ 3ghz with a 4770 outperforms the Q6600 @ 3.4ghz, with a 4870. I see this in games like WoW also.

 

[Annisman]

Just downloaded it from that site, but what the heck am I supposed to open it with ???

 

[Mousemonkey]

You can get a straightforward file from here. http://downloads.guru3d.com/S.T.A.L.K.E.R-Call-of-Pripyat-benchmark-download-2433.html

 

[Annisman]

Thanks mouse man

 

[Mousemonkey]

You're welcome mate.

 

[Maziar]

I tested with Ultra,Extreme and High settings with these as other settings:
Resolution:1920x1200
Renderer:Enhanced Full dyn lightning DX10
MSAA: Off
MSAA for A-tested objects: DX 10.0 style(default)
SSAO mode:HDAO
SSAO Quality:High
DX10.1

Ultra:

Extreme:


High:

 

[Mousemonkey]

I tested with Ultra,Extreme and High settings with these as other settings:
Resolution:1920x1200
Renderer:Enhanced Full dyn lightning DX10
MSAA: Off
MSAA for A-tested objects: DX 10.0 style(default)
SSAO mode:HDAO
SSAO Quality:High
DX10.1

Ultra:
[url]http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/th.20b5b9f9cb.jpg[/url]
Extreme:
[url]http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/th.554af892ca.jpg[/url]

High:
[url]http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/th.309ad9766a.jpg[/url]

It's interesting how your results are pretty comparable to mine mate.

 

[jennyh]

Hmm can you try running it at 1680x1050 to see if that is making such a huge difference?

 

[Maziar]

Hmm can you try running it at 1680x1050 to see if that is making such a huge difference?

Will do tomorrow

 

[jennyh]

There is something pretty strange going on here.

Using Maziar's settings (all except 1920x1080 res), I got this on my Q6600 @ 3.4ghz -

I'm thinking either windows 7 RC or the newest catalyst drivers might be putting it out of whack.

 

[Maziar]

It's interesting how your results are pretty comparable to mine mate.
http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/808/callofpripyatbenchmarkh.jpg

yes they are close,are your "Advanced settings" same as mine too ?
BTW mouse plz check your PM