Alright fanboys: HD 5000 or wait for GTX 300?

nofun

Distinguished
Nov 5, 2009
247
0
18,710
Looking at a double GPU card for my new build. The obvious choice today is the HD 5970 (assuming prices don't skyrocket before Christmas). However, nVidia has an ace in the hole: PhysX. My question is this: is PhysX worth it?

nVidia: "PhysX is awesome! Look at these awesome demonstrations! :: pulls out youtube video demos ::

AMD: "PhysX will be irrelevant when developers move towards standardized physics engines"

I'm using a P55 setup, so I want to stick to one GPU so I can keep all 16x lanes open on that PCI channel (so using a lower-end nVidia card with a big ATI card won't work). Personal thoughts on the best course of action for me?
 
Solution


Considering that ATI's strategy has been to lower prices as time passes, and competition arrives; if the 5970 is the card you will end up getting anyway then the total cost of obtaining now, versus buying a cheap card now and waiting, will be similar. If the top DX11 Nvidia cards ends up being what you desire, then you will have to hope their pricing isn't insane, and you will be able to sell your cheap card for minimal loss.

If I was in your situation, I would be picking up a 5970. Should it still be...

nofun

Distinguished
Nov 5, 2009
247
0
18,710


Well right now I've got an old HD 4350 just to get everything set up. Gaming performance will be pretty poor, but I can wait a few months if the right incentives are there...
 
The normal cards may not be out until spring but if he is looking for a dual GPU card like he said that may take much longer for Nvidia, if it happens at all.
The "best course of action" however would probably be a single HD5850 or an HD5870 because unless you are using a 2560x1600 monitor the HD5970 is overkill and a waste of money imo.
 

JofaMang

Distinguished
Jun 14, 2009
1,939
0
19,960
With the current stable of hardware, the 5970 is overkill for most anything. 2-3 years ago Crysis was hurting everyones build-ego. Having the money to get a 5970 today is not a bad thing, as long as the consumer is aware of the premium they are paying for, and how usuable the horsepower truly is, atm. Which is to say, it is waiting for software to catch up.

Ignoring all that if you wish, we can look at the reality of the situation. ATI has a 5970 now. Nvidia has nothing at all, and won't for several months. I think the street paper launch is looking to be somewhere around march-june now. No one can say for sure. What is for sure, is that ATI won't sit by and relax if Nvidia releases a superior game hammer to smash 3d wtih. If Fermi's Gaming prowess surpasses the comparable ATI cards, then ATI will have to refresh something to gain some ground back.

I guess my point is, if you have the money and will, a 5970 can at the least, be the most powerful card on the planet for the next 4-6 months. If having the best between Nvidia and ATI's DX11 products is REALLY important, I'd suggest what Bluescreendeath said, get a cheap card that can game (the 4350 will only make you cry) and wait for Nvidia's DX11 answer, and ATI's response.
 
You may end waiting until summer 2010 for GTX300...the next big thing is always around the corner...nothing like playing the "hurry up and wait" game...

+1 Agreed...

Heck, at $200+/- a 4890 is still a great card...

 

nofun

Distinguished
Nov 5, 2009
247
0
18,710


I don't mind spending a huge chunk of change on a dual-GPU card if the price/performance is there. The 5970 has been shown to outperform a crossfired 5850s and can keep up with crossfired 5870s when overclocked... and it costs about as much as two 5850s.

For me, the 5970 is a much better option: simpler case setup, better airflow, allows me to use all 16x PCI lanes, and isn't overpriced. Right now it's overkill, but I love eye-candy, and this build needs to last. I want something that can deliver the fps at high details 3-4 years down the pipe. If I had an X58, then crossfiring would be a better option, but with the P55 it's not - especially when I can get the same performance from a single card for approx. the same cost as a crossfire setup.

Get a $80 4830, $100 4850, or $125 4870 which will hold you until GTX300 releases...then ATI will drop their prices and you can decide.

Not a bad suggestion, but then that's another $100 in sunk costs. Now, if I could recoup most of that money via eBay and from cheaper HD 5000 prices once they have to compete with the GTX 300's, then that just might be worth it.
 

JofaMang

Distinguished
Jun 14, 2009
1,939
0
19,960


Considering that ATI's strategy has been to lower prices as time passes, and competition arrives; if the 5970 is the card you will end up getting anyway then the total cost of obtaining now, versus buying a cheap card now and waiting, will be similar. If the top DX11 Nvidia cards ends up being what you desire, then you will have to hope their pricing isn't insane, and you will be able to sell your cheap card for minimal loss.

If I was in your situation, I would be picking up a 5970. Should it still be the card you desire, the cost will be very similar to waiting. If Nvidia offers the card you want, selling a 5970 shouldn't be an issue. How much of a loss to be expected, though, is hard to quantify. Will you lose more money selling a 5970 in 4-6 months, than a cheap card? Without knowing any of these variables, I would chose to have the gaming power until then.
 
Solution


Well both the manufacturers and the fanbois won't be in favor of this but i suggest that you decide based upon what pleases you rather than them :)

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/batman-arkham-asylum,2465-11.html
http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/batman_arkham_asylum_physx_performance/page2.asp

I had thought that the 295 would be $350 - $400 by now but with ATI's 5970 selling at $30 - $80 over release price and 5870 at $30 - $135 above release price on newegg, and the continuing poor yields for their common fab plant, I don't see prices going down as supply diminishes.



 

nofun

Distinguished
Nov 5, 2009
247
0
18,710


Explain this sir.

Benchies show: Similar performance, relatively same cost (maybe $30 difference so long as prices stay where they are), and one GPU vs. multiple has many inherent advantages. Not to mention I have the juice and cooling to OC the HD 5970. What inherent benefits does Xfire bring to the table considering that I'm running a P55 mobo?
Stalker%204xAA.png
 

rodney_ws

Splendid
Dec 29, 2005
3,819
0
22,810
There is absolutely no way I'd be waiting for something from Nvidia at this point... there are just too many variables... mainly concerning the performance and the price. I'm a risk taker, but in this case I went with the sure thing... 5850! Hey, at $259 I don't think anyone is gonna say I got ripped off :)
 

nofun

Distinguished
Nov 5, 2009
247
0
18,710


You lucky bum, got it while the prices were still low :p
 

KidHorn

Distinguished
Oct 8, 2009
269
0
18,790
Right now, the question is somewhat moot as you can't get a 5850, 5870, 5970 or gt300.

Keep what you have until one of the above is actually available.

I recently bought a 4870 because it was the cheapest card that could play what I wanted to play. I didn't want to spend $300+ on a card that probably wouldn't be needed for over a year from now. I plan on holding out until pcie 3.0 comes out sometime in 2011 when I'll get a whole new system.
 

nofun

Distinguished
Nov 5, 2009
247
0
18,710


AMD released a statement saying that they feel they will be able to catch up with demand towards the end of December. How optimistic this statement is awaits to be seen.
 

nofun

Distinguished
Nov 5, 2009
247
0
18,710
Thanks again for all the good opinions floating around. I will see where prices are once they return to stock, and then either just get one immediately or wait until after Christmas and the prices come back down.
 

TRENDING THREADS