I'd like to start a discussion about the merits of Intel vs AMD motherboard chipsets. I haven't seen any discussions relating to certain aspects, such as disk access speed, TRIM, and the ICH10R vs the SB850.
I'm building a new computer, and trying to decide between an i7 920 and a Phenom II X4 955. From what I've read, the intel chipset has several advantages over the AMD:
Specifically, I'm looking at the Gigabyte GA-X58A-UDR3 for Intel, and the Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H for AMD.
Intel advantages:
1. ICH10R south bridge chipset appears to be faster than the SB850 for drive access, especially for SSD.
2. Intel SATA drivers will pass TRIM to the SSD, whereas AMD will not (you have to use the Win 7 drivers instead if you want to pass TRIM - would using the Win 7 drivers decrease SSD performance?
3. The X58 MOBO has 3 separate SATA controllers, allowing for 3 separate RAID/AHCI configurations? The AMD MOBO has 2. May be better for expandability? Not sure about this one. (also note that the 6gbs/3gbs is arranged differently - AMD has 6gbs built into the SB850, whereas Intel puts it on the Marvell chip. Not very important at this point but may become important as drives improve).
4. Intel MOBO uses triple-channel memory, AMD uses dual. Not sure if this will result in any practical performance increase, but 6gb DDR3 sounds more attractive than 4gb.
AMD advantages:
1. $200 cheaper for my CPU/MOBO/RAM combo.
Any advice or comments would be greatly appreciated.
This is my first build in a long time, and I'm focusing mainly on SSD performance. I plan to get an X-25 M 80gb. Trim is apparently very important, so the Intel MOBO with Trim support would seem like the better option. Of course, I could always use the manual TRIM built into the SSD Toolbox if I picked the AMD rig, right?
The ultimate question is: Do these advantages for the Intel chipset really exist, and if so, are they worth the extra $200?
Also, let's try not to discuss which CPU is better - that's not important for this discussion.
I'm building a new computer, and trying to decide between an i7 920 and a Phenom II X4 955. From what I've read, the intel chipset has several advantages over the AMD:
Specifically, I'm looking at the Gigabyte GA-X58A-UDR3 for Intel, and the Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H for AMD.
Intel advantages:
1. ICH10R south bridge chipset appears to be faster than the SB850 for drive access, especially for SSD.
2. Intel SATA drivers will pass TRIM to the SSD, whereas AMD will not (you have to use the Win 7 drivers instead if you want to pass TRIM - would using the Win 7 drivers decrease SSD performance?
3. The X58 MOBO has 3 separate SATA controllers, allowing for 3 separate RAID/AHCI configurations? The AMD MOBO has 2. May be better for expandability? Not sure about this one. (also note that the 6gbs/3gbs is arranged differently - AMD has 6gbs built into the SB850, whereas Intel puts it on the Marvell chip. Not very important at this point but may become important as drives improve).
4. Intel MOBO uses triple-channel memory, AMD uses dual. Not sure if this will result in any practical performance increase, but 6gb DDR3 sounds more attractive than 4gb.
AMD advantages:
1. $200 cheaper for my CPU/MOBO/RAM combo.
Any advice or comments would be greatly appreciated.
This is my first build in a long time, and I'm focusing mainly on SSD performance. I plan to get an X-25 M 80gb. Trim is apparently very important, so the Intel MOBO with Trim support would seem like the better option. Of course, I could always use the manual TRIM built into the SSD Toolbox if I picked the AMD rig, right?
The ultimate question is: Do these advantages for the Intel chipset really exist, and if so, are they worth the extra $200?
Also, let's try not to discuss which CPU is better - that's not important for this discussion.