Reliability, long term is still open and will be for a couple of years. Munf can simulate usage, but is no subsitute for real long term usage. My own opinion is the will be reliable. Todate the primary problem is design flaws concentrated in the firmware. These problems are gerally corrected realtively quick (SF2281 being an exception).
As to the general office enviorment, they simply are not cost effective and probably will not be for the near term. Two small and cost soooo much more than a HDD. Case inpoint: I have a older Dell laptop. At work, most desktops have been replaced with laptops so that they can be used both at work and on travel. I need a larger HD, not so much a faster one. At work the laptop is on 24/7, and has been since 2008. They are replacing these old systems with newer ones - Dought very seriousely they will have a SSD. The cost for say a 1000 laptops with SSDs vs HDD would add 130 grand that could better be spent else where.
Individually, some MAY have the need for speed, but normally SSDs, due to size, only boost OS and program load times Not a real biggy. If I need one at work, the project I'm on would buy me one.
That said, I had NO qualms about replacing a SCSI 2 Gig HDD with a 8 gig SLC drive in a critical computer (connected to a 20 Mil Satellite instrument.
Curently have:
.. 80 Gig G1 Intel (NO TRIM)
.. 80 Gig Intel G2
.. 120 gig Torqx
.. 120 Gig WD blue (Ugh losest performing SSD)
.. 120 Gig Pheonix Pro (same-same as vertex II)
.. 2 x 120 gig agility III (Although they work as advertize - My experience with them, never again OCZ.
.. 2 x 128 Gig Curcial M4's Love them and would choose over SF2281 based SSDs.
All with the exception of the 80 gig Intel G1 (stuck in a usb 3 enclosure as added storage for Notebooks) have been in a system since day 1 of purchase.
..