Leaked gtx 360 and gtx 380 benches

Status
Not open for further replies.

edzz111

Distinguished
Aug 15, 2006
28
0
18,530
Some leaked gtx3xx leaked benches...if this crap is true and Nvidia make them affordable AMD is F#cked

http://www.guru3d.com/news/geforce-gtx-360-and-380-benchmarks/

Mod Edit: Read this before posting speculation about AMD's doom: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/276399-33-leaked-benches#t2036350
 

XD_dued

Distinguished
Dec 23, 2008
415
0
18,810


I lol'd at the wood screws. Anyways, anyone could have made those charts.
 
G

Guest

Guest
The GTX380 should be a bit slower than the 5970 judging from its specs the 5970 has near 5TeraFlops. Dont forget ATI drivers for the 5970 sucks at the moment(Many games not taking advantage of the crossfire not scaling properly) but why they did not include a Crysis benchmarks which is the selling point of those powerfull cards?
Dual-Fermi will be the TopDog in my opinion,just like the 295 was but the 5970 will probably drop in price. When will we see dual fermi cards?
Only if nVidia would code ATI drivers LOL we would get true 5TeraFlops in games.
Waiting for the tomshwardware review.
 
Well, it is good to see 'leaked' benches, faked or not. At least it means we are one step closer to the real thing. Last month when NVidia was claiming they would get the chip out this year I knew it was false since the good faked benchmarks weren't even out yet. Now they are at least.
 

edzz111

Distinguished
Aug 15, 2006
28
0
18,530


my thoughts exactly...
 
G

Guest

Guest
Now the real question is WHEN? :D lol
It seems really close to the HD6 series launch lol
 
I see 5870's starting to stay in stock, so hopefully we have been through the worst of it. And if this isn't completely ironed out by the time NVidia's card is due, then TSMC really screwed up.
 
The GTX380 should be a bit slower than the 5970 judging from its specs the 5970 has near 5TeraFlops. Dont forget ATI drivers for the 5970 sucks at the moment(Many games not taking advantage of the crossfire not scaling properly) but why they did not include a Crysis benchmarks which is the selling point of those powerfull cards?
Dual-Fermi will be the TopDog in my opinion,just like the 295 was but the 5970 will probably drop in price. When will we see dual fermi cards?
Only if nVidia would code ATI drivers LOL we would get true 5TeraFlops in games.
Waiting for the tomshwardware review.


How do you work that exactly ? Do you have a link to what they have finally settled on for the Geforce version of the card ? Or are you basing this on the tessla specs ?

Mactronix
 

4745454b

Titan
Moderator
I wasn't that impressed, and think AMD might be dodging a bullet here. The 5870 managed to stay on top of the GTX360 for the most part, and semi near the GTX380. The 5870 only doubled the shaders of the 4870/90. GTX380 more then doubled the shader count, and by switching to DDR5 is massively increasing the memory bandwidth. I was afraid the GTX380 was going to be WAY faster then the 5870. Good to see thats not the case.

Another possible problem with Nvidia shows up however. All the benchies were ran in DX10. Do they not have DX11 working as it should yet? If DX11 doesn't work on these cards yet, they have a huge problem.
 

1898

Distinguished
Oct 13, 2009
249
0
18,690
I6e1Z.png


:D
 

noob2222

Distinguished
Nov 19, 2007
2,722
0
20,860
If those numbers are close, you can expect to pay out the a$$. $800, $1200 imo. 2gb ddr5 isn't cheap and can't be cheaper than any of ATI's cards since Nvidia has to pay for all the screw ups on this card already. (including the wood screw cards) If you really think it will be reasonably priced, when has Nvidia ever been reasonably priced?

Power draw is probably in the 200-250 range, so dual chip is impossible since it would draw easily over the 300W limit.
 
G

Guest

Guest


Mac,

Hers the GTX360 , GTX380 Specs:

http://www.geeks3d.com/20091209/geforce-gtx-380-and-360-specifications/

And I have the 5970 xD
 
Doubling the specs plus a lil more wont help if the core clocks arent there.
The memory BW wasnt as great a problem as one would imagine as some think on the G200, except at higher res, where we see the 295 tanking, and that too could be lack of memory management, which could be the big change in the 300 series, which would help also.
My best "guess" would be a 60% jump plus anything over 100% improvements, so possibly 70%, and thats best perf, over a 285. But again, thats a guess, better than faked
 
Status
Not open for further replies.