Leaked gtx 360 and gtx 380 benches

Some leaked gtx3xx leaked benches...if this crap is true and Nvidia make them affordable AMD is F#cked

http://www.guru3d.com/news/geforce [...] enchmarks/

Mod Edit: Read this before posting speculation about AMD's doom: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] s#t2036350

Some other leaked benchmarks which are totally legit: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8EKtCK8zbY

The GTX380 should be a bit slower than the 5970 judging from its specs the 5970 has near 5TeraFlops. Dont forget ATI drivers for the 5970 sucks at the moment(Many games not taking advantage of the crossfire not scaling properly) but why they did not include a Crysis benchmarks which is the selling point of those powerfull cards?
Dual-Fermi will be the TopDog in my opinion,just like the 295 was but the 5970 will probably drop in price. When will we see dual fermi cards?
Only if nVidia would code ATI drivers LOL we would get true 5TeraFlops in games.
Waiting for the tomshwardware review.

my thoughts exactly...

Yeah, they didn't have much confidence in their forum member (neither do I).

Yep, I sure hope not that long though.

I see 5870's starting to stay in stock, so hopefully we have been through the worst of it. And if this isn't completely ironed out by the time NVidia's card is due, then TSMC really screwed up.

if the HD5*** cards are staying in stock then its safe to assume the worst has passed (hopefully)....

I wasn't that impressed, and think AMD might be dodging a bullet here. The 5870 managed to stay on top of the GTX360 for the most part, and semi near the GTX380. The 5870 only doubled the shaders of the 4870/90. GTX380 more then doubled the shader count, and by switching to DDR5 is massively increasing the memory bandwidth. I was afraid the GTX380 was going to be WAY faster then the 5870. Good to see thats not the case.

Another possible problem with Nvidia shows up however. All the benchies were ran in DX10. Do they not have DX11 working as it should yet? If DX11 doesn't work on these cards yet, they have a huge problem.

Guys they are 100% fake without a doubt. The slides (at least the Far Cry one) are a more official looking mockup with data taken from then 1920x1200 data here: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] 380-gtx360

Successful_troll is successful.

Mac,

Hers the GTX360 , GTX380 Specs:

http://www.geeks3d.com/20091209/ge [...] fications/

And I have the 5970 xD

whahahhaa nice one man
but I don't think a lot of people will get it
http://fc02.deviantart.net/fs38/f/ [...] albune.jpg

just a question for you, how come you don't show your rig?

wow these fake benchies are making their way all over the place. i dont believe it for good or bad until something more substantial than a photoshopped slide starts making its way around then i will still remain skeptical until retail hardware makes it to the review sites sometime in March.

All previous information points to the G300 being a massive chip, meaning it will be much more expensive to manufacture than the RV870, especially if it has that 384-bit bus. It should be faster than the RV870, but I wonder about those benchmarks and the test conditions if they really are legit, which I don't think they are. If yields are as bad as they say for nVidia though then I think AMD can actually afford to sell the 5970 cheaper than NVIDIA can afford to sell the GTX 360 .

Well the fact that we are seeing fake benches is a start

That's usually the precursor of real benches and maybe even a release some time within the next 3 months...

But yes, these are clearly fake. There is simply no chance at all that a single gpu can beat the 5970.

It is actually ~550mm^2, unless I misunderstood your statement. Hers another info:

http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/16767/1/

Lerrabee...is that the cousin of Neverbee?

LOOL Best Joke I have heard this week +1 on this Good one

Can it be LRB, or is it but a wannabe?For that we'll just have to wait n see

whatever kind of bee that is it will sting the $hit out of both fermi and evergreed .

That's a lot of gpu's and you can only imagine how many they would have sold if not for the issues at TSMC. I'd love to know how much they were making on each too.

They are way ahead of the 4xxx series sales at this stage btw. WAY ahead. That means that a lot of Nvidia buyers have jumped ship instead of waiting.

All true but then cost never really stoped people buying the latest and greatest now did it. 8800GTX Ultra springs to mind as one such chip that sold despite being stupidly priced.
If these faked charts are anything like close then the Nvidia camp will have a very viable product to ship, regardles of (well within reason obviously) price/perf. Nvidia fans dont seem in general that bothered about price/perf the same way ATI fans seem to be. Just an observation on my part but i can remember countless discusions on the subject with ATI parts but not as many with Nvidia parts.

Mactronix

Eyefinity is a gimmick

1 the 3 monitors have to be all the same resolution which from among my friends usually if one has 2+ monitors unless they were all bought at the same time they are different rez and different sizes.

2 you need 3 monitors or more which is a pretty rare set up to begin with

3 it's a gimmick because of that like cuda, yes it has it's use but it's hardly mainstream enough to be a true selling point to every user.

4 it doesn't prove an advantage if anything it proves a disadvantage by making you use your perphials but it is an experience. It's no more a valid seeling point then nvidia 3d stereoscopic crap.

I hope the GTX380 is better then a 5970 hell i hope it crushes all previous records easily, although i know that's def not the deal atleast like crushing performance diff it would be nice to have a powerful gpu, although knowing nvidia price would be 8800ULTRA costs lol

Hey i'm one of those people at least until i have a bad rma experience with Evga or BFG which are still exclusive nvidia partners. But i'm no a zelot i readily will recommend a ATI card to someone else i just not gonna bother for myself.