HELP.. Western Digital Caviar Green WD15EARS 1.5TB vs Western Digital

Forum CPU & Components : Other Components HELP.. Western Digital Caviar Green WD15EARS 1.5TB vs Western Digital

Hi guys I am lost.. I was planning to buy

Western Digital Caviar Black WD1001FALS 1TB 7200 RPM 32MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive -Bare Drive

BUT suddenly I saw this :

Western Digital Caviar Green WD15EARS 1.5TB 64MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive -Bare Drive

WTF... for $10 more I can get 500gb more spaces on the Western Digital Caviar. Whats really the difference between the two cuz really I can't really tell..i mean for additional $10 dollar I get 500gb more spaces! SO WHATS THE CATCH ...???????

Reply to alricking113

I heared that the best hdd is the SAMSUNG SPINPOINT F3 1TB than WD,For more u can look here:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 20F3%201TB

Reply to Aneesh@4GHz

WD have a bad failure rate.

Green drive usually spin slower to conserve power and heat.

Unless this is going to be for data storage and not for the o/s, get the WD15EARS 1.5TB.

------------------------------ HP Pavilion DV7-3020EA Entertainment Notebook PC + Win 7 Pro SP1 x64
GA-870A-UD3 + AMD PH-II X6 1100T BE + Hyper212+ + 8GB DDR3-1600 + GTX460 + Win 7 Pro SP1 x64
GA-870A-UD3 + AMD PH-II X4 840 + 4GB DDR3-1333 + ATI 3450 + SVR08 R2 SP1 x64
Reply to das_stig

Can you send me the link for WD15EARS 1.5TB.

Is it great to use as main drive or better for storage????

Reply to alricking113

Ask the community Add a reply

Related content

See all topics related to "HELP.. Western Digital Caviar Green WD15EARS 1.5TB vs Western Digital"

Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > Other Components > HELP.. Western Digital Caviar Green WD15EARS 1.5TB vs Western Digital

Go to:

Help |
Forum rules

There are 1926 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Bestofmedia Forum ©
2000-2009 Bestofmedia Group

Page generated in 4.081 seconds

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel