Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Computer

Last response: in CPUs
Share
Anonymous
a b à CPUs
February 26, 2010 6:48:42 PM

will a computer be more efficient if its processor has more or fewer cores?

More about : computer

February 26, 2010 7:11:30 PM

Ya be more specific.

A 3g Quad core can do more calculations then an 3g single core if thats what you mean.
m
0
l
a c 105 à CPUs
February 26, 2010 7:33:31 PM

energy efficient or work load efficient?
m
0
l
Related resources
February 26, 2010 8:04:13 PM

in terms of power consumption, it depends on the TDP of the processor.

in terms of calculations /minute, more cores is better but this depends on if the software was written for multi-cores

in terms of calculations/watt, chances are the multi-core will still prevail because most processors have very similar TDP's

and finally you have to take into account that all multi-core processors can scale back and use only one or any number of their cores to increase efficiency in terms of power given system demand/load. So essentially there is no reason not to get multi-core unless you are really concerned about a few watts of power.
m
0
l
February 26, 2010 8:17:34 PM

Your question is not vague enough! You're supposed to say "which processor is more efficient" and stop there!

Kidding

Going out on a limb and assuming by efficient you're talking in terms of power consumption. In which case, less is more (more as in better). Fewer cores will require less power which leads to better efficiency. For most applications, a CPU with 2 cores will suffice, and require less power than a comparable quad-core (clock-for-clock). However, in terms of overall performance (assuming you're running multi-threaded tasks and/or Windows 7), more cores will get the job done quicker, generally speaking.
m
0
l
!