Q6600 unstable past 3.2GHz
Tags:
Last response: in Overclocking
Hi.
I have currently been trying to overclock to 3.8GHz.
I get BSOD's and windows freezes causing me to have to power off manualy when going above 3.2GHz.
Temps are fine. 35c idle, not sure about load as it keeps crashing. Iv raised the voltage to 1.4v and still no luck.
Please help.
Mobo: XFX 780i 3-way SLI (Antec Kuhler h2o 920 watercool)
GPU: XFX GTX285 1GB
RAM: X2 2GB DDR2 800mhz
PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower 650w
I have currently been trying to overclock to 3.8GHz.
I get BSOD's and windows freezes causing me to have to power off manualy when going above 3.2GHz.
Temps are fine. 35c idle, not sure about load as it keeps crashing. Iv raised the voltage to 1.4v and still no luck.
Please help.
Mobo: XFX 780i 3-way SLI (Antec Kuhler h2o 920 watercool)
GPU: XFX GTX285 1GB
RAM: X2 2GB DDR2 800mhz
PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower 650w
More about : q6600 unstable past 2ghz
rubix_1011 said:
Idle temps are different than load temps, btw. Are you running RAM in linked or unlinked? What is your voltage, multiplier and FSB set to?
I set the ram to 900. If i go ny higher i get a long beeping noise and everything resets itself.
Sorry im a noob when it comes to overclocking. Should i lower the multiplier and go for a higher fsb?
Related ressources
- Can't overclock my Q6600 past 2.7Ghz - Forum
- [HELP]Overclocking the Q6600 @ 3.2ghz on Asus P5n-e Sli MB - Forum
- Need help reaching 3.2Ghz on E6600 - Forum
- My Q6600 (2.4 Ghz) don't want to go above 3.2Ghz :( - Forum
- Overclocked computer freezes ( not unstable ) - Forum
Quote:
I set the ram to 900. If i go ny higher i get a long beeping noise and everything resets itself. This is why. You are going to need to run 1066 or higher to get much further. I was running DDR3 1600 when I got 3.4+. Your RAM isn't allowing the speeds (and likely the voltages, if they are set to AUTO) when you bump your FSB. Run your memory unlinked to see if this buys you some more clock speed.
You aren't going to get much higher than 3.1ghz where you stand now.
I had far more luck on my 790i w/DDR3 RAM than I did with the 780i and DDR2 RAM.
I can get ram upto 900 but no further. Should i raise the volt on my NB & SB?
You are likely going to have to raise NB a bit; have you raised your RAM voltage at all or loosened timings? Are you running linked or unlinked mode? (Do you have that option?) I don't know why it would show one thing in BIOS and another in Windows unless you have SpeedStep on (which wouldn't make sense, it would be much different specs) or you have an issue with your BIOS version and should flash, or your temp/CPU monitoring is reading it incorrectly.
Quote:
I currently have it set to 3.4GHz in bios however windows reads it as 3.60GHz?? I can get ram upto 900 but no further. Should i raise the volt on my NB & SB?
You are likely going to have to raise NB a bit; have you raised your RAM voltage at all or loosened timings? Are you running linked or unlinked mode? (Do you have that option?) I don't know why it would show one thing in BIOS and another in Windows unless you have SpeedStep on (which wouldn't make sense, it would be much different specs) or you have an issue with your BIOS version and should flash, or your temp/CPU monitoring is reading it incorrectly.
rubix_1011 said:
I had far more luck on my 790i w/DDR3 RAM than I did with the 780i and DDR2 RAM. Quote:
I currently have it set to 3.4GHz in bios however windows reads it as 3.60GHz?? I can get ram upto 900 but no further. Should i raise the volt on my NB & SB?
You are likely going to have to raise NB a bit; have you raised your RAM voltage at all or loosened timings? Are you running linked or unlinked mode? (Do you have that option?) I don't know why it would show one thing in BIOS and another in Windows unless you have SpeedStep on (which wouldn't make sense, it would be much different specs) or you have an issue with your BIOS version and should flash, or your temp/CPU monitoring is reading it incorrectly.
Sorry. Windows was reading it correctly, i must have not reduced it back to 3.4. Its currently at 3.42GHz with a volt of 1.43. Is the NB on these mobo's the SPP or MCP?
Let's do some math here. The Q6600 has a max CPU multiplier of 9. Using that multiplier and the target 3.8GHz frequency you'll need to get the FSB up to 422MHz to hit 3.8GHz. This shouldn't be an issue for good DDR2-800Mhz ram.
The issue I have is you've already said you don't no much about OCing and you've really failed to tell us much about your system. If you have a B3 stepping Q6600 the odds of you hitting 3.8 are pretty slim. G0 can do it but as mentioned you'll probably have issues with that 780i board. Just going into the bios and upping voltages can fry your system. And without knowing what the ram is rated at other then 800MHz its hard to say what timings and voltages to use. You might want to slow down and do some reading.
Assuming you have good ram, 1.4Vcore, 422MHz FSB, CPU 9x, 5-5-5-18 @ 2.0v. Does it boot? If not drop the CPU down to 6x and see if the board can even handle 422.
The issue I have is you've already said you don't no much about OCing and you've really failed to tell us much about your system. If you have a B3 stepping Q6600 the odds of you hitting 3.8 are pretty slim. G0 can do it but as mentioned you'll probably have issues with that 780i board. Just going into the bios and upping voltages can fry your system. And without knowing what the ram is rated at other then 800MHz its hard to say what timings and voltages to use. You might want to slow down and do some reading.
Assuming you have good ram, 1.4Vcore, 422MHz FSB, CPU 9x, 5-5-5-18 @ 2.0v. Does it boot? If not drop the CPU down to 6x and see if the board can even handle 422.
4745454b said:
Let's do some math here. The Q6600 has a max CPU multiplier of 9. Using that multiplier and the target 3.8GHz frequency you'll need to get the FSB up to 422MHz to hit 3.8GHz. This shouldn't be an issue for good DDR2-800Mhz ram. The issue I have is you've already said you don't no much about OCing and you've really failed to tell us much about your system. If you have a B3 stepping Q6600 the odds of you hitting 3.8 are pretty slim. G0 can do it but as mentioned you'll probably have issues with that 780i board. Just going into the bios and upping voltages can fry your system. And without knowing what the ram is rated at other then 800MHz its hard to say what timings and voltages to use. You might want to slow down and do some reading.
Assuming you have good ram, 1.4Vcore, 422MHz FSB, CPU 9x, 5-5-5-18 @ 2.0v. Does it boot? If not drop the CPU down to 6x and see if the board can even handle 422.
5-5-5-18 @ 2.0v ? we need to first know what ram he is using don't you think ?
Much of the issue is based on the fact that he's really a novice at overclocking and doesn't provide much exacting information about his hardware.
There are piles and piles of Core2 quad OC guides on the web that would be quite helpful to Google. This being said, you cannot simply copy one person's configs and have it work for you in most instances. My suggestion is to do more Google searchs on Core2 Quad OC guides (we have some in these forums) and learn your hardware.
There are piles and piles of Core2 quad OC guides on the web that would be quite helpful to Google. This being said, you cannot simply copy one person's configs and have it work for you in most instances. My suggestion is to do more Google searchs on Core2 Quad OC guides (we have some in these forums) and learn your hardware.
I got a xfx 780i my self and it is not a crappy board at all, core 2 quad isn't always an easy cpu to nuke to high clocks especially when accounting that at stock it is already 95w while some samples are worse at 105w. Not all boards can support this cpu at 4ghz as it's power consumption at those clocks is likely over 200w with voltage adjustments. Second there are youtube video guides how to get the most out of this board. I have avoided this cpu for a reason as far to many people have burned out their boards.
For the reasons above (780i's lack of overclocking stability, practical OC limits to a Q6600) it is quite unlikely that you will be able to reach a stable 3.8GHz overclock, especially with vCore set to only 1.4v.
As a first step, I recommend to follow 4745454b's advice.
Set your FSB:Memory multiplier to the lowest possible setting (1:1 or slowest speed), drop your RAM timings to 5-5-5-18 or lower, make sure your RAM voltage is set to at least 1.9v (you may need more depending on your specific RAM), lower your CPU multiplier to 6x and increase the FSB to 400MHz (a 3.6GHz overclock is a more realistic max overclock for a G0 Q6600) followed by a few rounds of stability testing.
Make sure to keep an eye on your temps during testing; they should never exceed 71°!
Assuming that your system passes the stability tests, indicating that your motherboard is capable of running at 400MHz FSB, you should then begin testing your CPU for stability at higher speeds.
While testing make sure and keep your RAM timings lowered to ensure stability.
Start by raising your vCore to Intel's Specified Maximum of 1.5v and bumping the multiplier to 9x.
With any luck your system will boot and you can begin stress testing.
If your system is stable and not overheating, congrats, you can now test lowering your vCore until testing fails (then raise it 2 notches in the BIOS).
If your system is not immediately stable at 3.6GHz, sorry for your luck; either your motherboard or CPU is incapable of handling such an advanced overclock.
At this point you have two options, lower the FSB or lower the multiplier.
Lowering the multiplier to 8x will defiantly help with stability but, with a 400MHz FSB, you will be limited to a 3.2GHz overclock.
Lowering the FSB will be more time consuming (as you try to locate the exact point where you lose stability) but will likely lead to a higher overclock.
If you have further questions or issues, first read the Core 2 Overclocking Guide (twice) then post your exacting issues.
Best luck!
As a first step, I recommend to follow 4745454b's advice.
Set your FSB:Memory multiplier to the lowest possible setting (1:1 or slowest speed), drop your RAM timings to 5-5-5-18 or lower, make sure your RAM voltage is set to at least 1.9v (you may need more depending on your specific RAM), lower your CPU multiplier to 6x and increase the FSB to 400MHz (a 3.6GHz overclock is a more realistic max overclock for a G0 Q6600) followed by a few rounds of stability testing.
Make sure to keep an eye on your temps during testing; they should never exceed 71°!
Assuming that your system passes the stability tests, indicating that your motherboard is capable of running at 400MHz FSB, you should then begin testing your CPU for stability at higher speeds.
While testing make sure and keep your RAM timings lowered to ensure stability.
Start by raising your vCore to Intel's Specified Maximum of 1.5v and bumping the multiplier to 9x.
With any luck your system will boot and you can begin stress testing.
If your system is stable and not overheating, congrats, you can now test lowering your vCore until testing fails (then raise it 2 notches in the BIOS).
If your system is not immediately stable at 3.6GHz, sorry for your luck; either your motherboard or CPU is incapable of handling such an advanced overclock.
At this point you have two options, lower the FSB or lower the multiplier.
Lowering the multiplier to 8x will defiantly help with stability but, with a 400MHz FSB, you will be limited to a 3.2GHz overclock.
Lowering the FSB will be more time consuming (as you try to locate the exact point where you lose stability) but will likely lead to a higher overclock.
If you have further questions or issues, first read the Core 2 Overclocking Guide (twice) then post your exacting issues.
Best luck!
outlw6669 said:
For the reasons above (780i's lack of overclocking stability, practical OC limits to a Q6600) it is quite unlikely that you will be able to reach a stable 3.8GHz overclock, especially with vCore set to only 1.4v.As a first step, I recommend to follow 4745454b's advice.
Set your FSB:Memory multiplier to the lowest possible setting (1:1 or slowest speed), drop your RAM timings to 5-5-5-18 or lower, make sure your RAM voltage is set to at least 1.9v (you may need more depending on your specific RAM), lower your CPU multiplier to 6x and increase the FSB to 400MHz (a 3.6GHz overclock is a more realistic max overclock for a G0 Q6600) followed by a few rounds of stability testing.
Make sure to keep an eye on your temps during testing; they should never exceed 71°!
Assuming that your system passes the stability tests, indicating that your motherboard is capable of running at 400MHz FSB, you should then begin testing your CPU for stability at higher speeds.
While testing make sure and keep your RAM timings lowered to ensure stability.
Start by raising your vCore to Intel's Specified Maximum of 1.5v and bumping the multiplier to 9x.
With any luck your system will boot and you can begin stress testing.
If your system is stable and not overheating, congrats, you can now test lowering your vCore until testing fails (then raise it 2 notches in the BIOS).
If your system is not immediately stable at 3.6GHz, sorry for your luck; either your motherboard or CPU is incapable of handling such an advanced overclock.
At this point you have two options, lower the FSB or lower the multiplier.
Lowering the multiplier to 8x will defiantly help with stability but, with a 400MHz FSB, you will be limited to a 3.2GHz overclock.
Lowering the FSB will be more time consuming (as you try to locate the exact point where you lose stability) but will likely lead to a higher overclock.
If you have further questions or issues, first read the Core 2 Overclocking Guide (twice) then post your exacting issues.
Best luck!
Well its stable at 3.42GHz so il stick with that. Its giving me a 10fps boost in some games. I will not burn my mobo out at 3.4 will i? with a v core of 1.43?
Yes, the Q9xxx series where produced at 45nm (compared to the Q6xxx series at 65nm) and where much better overclockers.
Unfortunately, the majority of Q9xxx processors ran on a 333MHz FSB with lower multipliers, making chipset stability a major factor in overclocking.
Luckily, your Q9650 is a higher end C2Q and still has a 9x multiplier.
As such, it should have no issues running at 3.6GHz and can likely go higher depending on your motherboards limits.
Just be sure to limit your vCore to 1.3625v, the upper limit for 45NM C2Qs.
The same 71° temp limit applies; make sure to keep it cooler under maximum load.
Unfortunately, the majority of Q9xxx processors ran on a 333MHz FSB with lower multipliers, making chipset stability a major factor in overclocking.
Luckily, your Q9650 is a higher end C2Q and still has a 9x multiplier.
As such, it should have no issues running at 3.6GHz and can likely go higher depending on your motherboards limits.
Just be sure to limit your vCore to 1.3625v, the upper limit for 45NM C2Qs.
The same 71° temp limit applies; make sure to keep it cooler under maximum load.
outlw6669 said:
Yes, the Q9xxx series where produced at 45nm (compared to the Q6xxx series at 65nm) and where much better overclockers.Unfortunately, the majority of Q9xxx processors ran on a 333MHz FSB with lower multipliers, making chipset stability a major factor in overclocking.
Luckily, your Q9650 is a higher end C2Q and still has a 9x multiplier.
As such, it should have no issues running at 3.6GHz and can likely go higher depending on your motherboards limits.
Just be sure to limit your vCore to 1.3625v, the upper limit for 45NM C2Qs.
The same 71° temp limit applies; make sure to keep it cooler under maximum load.
I ran a QX9650 at a little over 1.4 volts on water. Unfortunately the chip was a very early production run so it could only hit 4Ghz stable but that was still pretty good. It didn't run too hot
Best solution
Yeah, for your applied voltage, your overclock is about right.
As a point of comparison, my old Q6600 was stable 3.2GHz @1.325v and 3.6GHz @1.5v.
3.4GHz with 1.43v is probably a good compromise between the increased power consumption and slower speed.
For your temps, 59° max is well within acceptable limits.
As a point of comparison, my old Q6600 was stable 3.2GHz @1.325v and 3.6GHz @1.5v.
3.4GHz with 1.43v is probably a good compromise between the increased power consumption and slower speed.
For your temps, 59° max is well within acceptable limits.
Related ressources:
- ForumP35-DS3L+ Q6600 , I can't even get stable @ > 3.2GHz
- ForumQ6600 on asus 780i blank screen, no post
- ForumQ6600 won't post after 3.2Ghz
- ForumQ6600 with DK P35-T2RS overclocked UPDATE 3.2ghz
- ForumQ6600 3.2GHz / 1600 RAM
- Forumowners of q6600 @ 3.2+Ghz on air - What are your specs?
- ForumQ6600 overclock help needed
- ForumQ6600 GO in a EVGA 750I FTW Extremely unstable after 3.2
- ForumCan't overclock past 3.2GHz on X3 720, help!
- ForumGtx 570 and cpu q6600 how big bottleneck
- ForumIntel 2 Quad Q6600
- ForumAre there pulsatile pumps?
- Forum[Solved] Q6600 4.2GHz H70?
- ForumHow should I overclock this to get 3.2ghz?
- ForumNeed help fast, Q6600 overclock on 2 cores
- More resources
Read discussions in other Overclocking categories
!