Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
sticky

Intel Overclocking Club - Page 9

Tags:
  • Overclocking
  • Intel
  • CPUs
Last response: in Overclocking
Share
a c 150 K Overclocking
a b å Intel
a c 186 à CPUs
August 7, 2013 10:39:13 AM

Will update charts soon.

SR-71 those GIFs man...
August 12, 2013 3:39:23 PM

Name: Angully
CPU: I5 4670K
Case: Fractal Define R3 [Modified for external mounted H100I P/P]
GFX: GTX650
Motherboard: Asus Z87-K
CPU Voltage: 1.275
CPU Bus Speed/Multiplier: 100x
Clock Speed: 46
RAM: Corsair 16GB 2x8GB 1600mhz
Cooling: Corsair H100I
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate
HDD1: Sandisk SSD 64GB
HDD2: Seagate 1TB Barracuda

I bought this PC one week ago it is my first new system. xD
This was a huge thing for me since Ive been taking apart PC's since the age of 5 I am 23 now so have had lots of experience with computers i had just never been in the situation where i could afford one and then my amazing GF put a substantial amount towards it :) 

I decided after 3 days that the stock cooling system wasn't going to cut it so i ordered a H100I before checking the case compatibility xP (noob mistake i know)

Anyway i would be honored to join the ranks of the intel overclocker's i am also intrigued of what sort of speed people are getting on there 4670K's since i am still unsure if i have a good or bad cpu.

-Angully

Edit:

1.Had to take the clock down to 4.5 due to crash while using prime95 which makes no sense to me since i ran intel burn on very high with Furmark for an hour and had no issues with heat.

2. Stable at 4.5 now recducing the voltage to 1.25
a c 143 K Overclocking
a b å Intel
a c 245 à CPUs
August 12, 2013 3:59:30 PM

amuffin said:
Will update charts soon.

SR-71 those GIFs man...


Yeah, they give me a headache too.
Related resources
a b K Overclocking
a b à CPUs
August 14, 2013 4:40:59 PM

Name: Justin S (jnewegger23)
CPU: i7 3770k
Motherboard: p8z77-v le plus
CPU Voltage: 1.120
CPU Bus Speed/Multiplier:100*43
Clock Speed: 4.3GHz
RAM: Patriot Gamer 2 Series 16GB (2x8gb) 1333mhz DDR3 9-9-9-24
Cooling: Corsair H80i Closed Loop Water Cooling System
OS: Windows 8 Home Premium OEM 64bit
CPU-Z Validation: http://valid.canardpc.com/2889573

http://min.us/lFI9Zs5h0ix3c



August 20, 2013 10:39:53 AM

Name: porkchopVSintel
CPU: i7 3770k
Motherboard: ASUS SABERTOOTH Z77
CPU Voltage: 1.280V
CPU Bus Speed/Multiplier: 100/46
RAM: 2x4GB Kingston Hyperx Genesis gray (9/9/9/27)-1T
Cooling: Corsair H100I Push
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64 Bit
a c 296 K Overclocking
a c 162 à CPUs
August 29, 2013 8:19:07 AM

schmuckley said:
http://valid.canardpc.com/2897134
LN2 cooling.
Biostah Powah! :D 


Disabling two cores will get a higher validation...
a b K Overclocking
a b à CPUs
August 30, 2013 6:28:42 PM

amuffin said:
Will update charts soon.

SR-71 those GIFs man...


Looking forward to seeing me included! Let me know if my previous post is missing anything! Thanks for putting this together!
a b K Overclocking
a b à CPUs
September 7, 2013 3:36:01 AM

Name: SimonGranstrom
CPU: i5-4670K
Motherboard: Asrock z87-m pro4
CPU Voltage: 1.293v
CPU Bus Speed/Multiplier: 100*46
Clock Speed: 4.6ghz
RAM: 12gb Unknown 1333mhz 9-9-9-24
Cooling: Cooler Master Seidon 240M in pull.
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

free screenshot software" alt="" class="imgLz frmImg " />
a c 296 K Overclocking
a c 162 à CPUs
September 7, 2013 5:56:11 PM

schmuckley said:
saint19 said:
schmuckley said:
http://valid.canardpc.com/2897134
LN2 cooling.
Biostah Powah! :D 


Disabling two cores will get a higher validation...



He was right! :D  http://valid.canardpc.com/2898258 LN2



A little more of "off-topic".

You can try with changing the reference clock to 104-105, keeping the RAM under specs and rising multiplier again with only two cores. Will give you more higher frequency ;) 
a b K Overclocking
a b à CPUs
September 8, 2013 10:52:46 PM

saint19 said:
schmuckley said:
saint19 said:
schmuckley said:
http://valid.canardpc.com/2897134
LN2 cooling.
Biostah Powah! :D 


Disabling two cores will get a higher validation...



He was right! :D  http://valid.canardpc.com/2898258 LN2



A little more of "off-topic".

You can try with changing the reference clock to 104-105, keeping the RAM under specs and rising multiplier again with only two cores. Will give you more higher frequency ;) 


eh..tops out @ 103.6 ..125 strap does not work when using dedicated gfx.This board does not unlink the pcie slot.
September 13, 2013 6:49:39 PM

Name: ckengine
CPU: i7-4770k
Motherboard: Asus Maximus VI formula
CPU Voltage: 1.21 adaptive
CPU Bus Speed/Multiplier: 100*43
Clock Speed: 4.3ghz
RAM: Gskill Trident X DDR3 10-12-12-31-2T
Cooling: Watercooling Loop
OS:Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit
CPU-Z Validation: http://valid.canardpc.com/2899783

Uploaded with ImageShack.us" alt="" class="imgLz frmImg " />

Update: needed to go to 1.21v to pass 25 IBT at very high
a b K Overclocking
a b à CPUs
September 15, 2013 2:36:32 PM

SimonGranstrom said:
Name: SimonGranstrom
CPU: i5-4670K
Motherboard: Asrock z87-m pro4
CPU Voltage: 1.293v
CPU Bus Speed/Multiplier: 100*46
Clock Speed: 4.6ghz
RAM: 12gb Unknown 1333mhz 9-9-9-24
Cooling: Cooler Master Seidon 240M in pull.
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit



nice overclock did you change the cpu input voltage (VCCIN) to keep it stable or just on stock?
a b K Overclocking
a b à CPUs
September 15, 2013 2:56:40 PM

kiezz said:
SimonGranstrom said:
Name: SimonGranstrom
CPU: i5-4670K
Motherboard: Asrock z87-m pro4
CPU Voltage: 1.293v
CPU Bus Speed/Multiplier: 100*46
Clock Speed: 4.6ghz
RAM: 12gb Unknown 1333mhz 9-9-9-24
Cooling: Cooler Master Seidon 240M in pull.
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit



nice overclock did you change the cpu input voltage (VCCIN) to keep it stable or just on stock?


It's at stock, but i have it at 4.5ghz and 1.22v for daily usage.
September 16, 2013 3:58:33 AM

Name: DTH
CPU: i5-4670k
Motherboard: Asus Z87-Pro
CPU Voltage: 1.29
CPU Bus Speed/Multiplier: 100 * 50
Clock Speed: 5Ghz
RAM: 16gb Corsair Vengeance 1600mhz (4x4)
Cooling: XSPC RayStorm 750 RS360 + fans
OS: Windows 8 64-bit










Need anything else?
a c 249 K Overclocking
a c 110 à CPUs
September 16, 2013 4:12:04 AM

@ DTH, Your 5,000mhz second screenshot shows IBT did not complete, your bottom screenshot with IBT successfully completed, only shows a 1900mhz clock in CPU-Z?

To claim 5,000mhz stability you'll need a screenshot at 5,000mhz with IBT successfully completed, and a CPU-Z validation of the 5,000mhz clock.

A CPU-Z validation separately provided does not prove 5,000mhz stability unless it was achieved at the same time the IBT was run, so it should all be on the same screenshot.

Here's a suggestion, If you pull 2 of those memory modules 4 x 4 = 16gb to 2 x 4 = 8gb in your primary slots you may have an easier time stabilizing 5,000mhz clock with 8gb of memory.
September 16, 2013 4:59:33 AM

4Ryan6 said:
@ DTH, Your 5,000mhz second screenshot shows IBT did not complete, your bottom screenshot with IBT successfully completed, only shows a 1900mhz clock in CPU-Z?

To claim 5,000mhz stability you'll need a screenshot at 5,000mhz with IBT successfully completed, and a CPU-Z validation of the 5,000mhz clock.

A CPU-Z validation separately provided does not prove 5,000mhz stability unless it was achieved at the same time the IBT was run, so it should all be on the same screenshot.

Here's a suggestion, If you pull 2 of those memory modules 4 x 4 = 16gb to 2 x 4 = 8gb in your primary slots you may have an easier time stabilizing 5,000mhz clock with 8gb of memory.


Sorry I'm new to this stuff...

The one screenshot was while it was running and the other was from when the IBT was completed. So do I run the test and leave the results open, and run the test again? This is not my area of expertise... I did the CPU-Z validation thing but wasn't too sure how to share the results...
a c 249 K Overclocking
a c 110 à CPUs
September 16, 2013 5:31:17 AM

DTH said:
Sorry I'm new to this stuff...

The one screenshot was while it was running and the other was from when the IBT was completed. So do I run the test and leave the results open, and run the test again? This is not my area of expertise... I did the CPU-Z validation thing but wasn't too sure how to share the results...


Have CPU-Z open, desktop visible displaying the clock speed then run the IBT stress test, when IBT successfully completes take your screenshot, if your overclock is BIOS set with speed step disabled, it should still show a 5ghz clock speed when IBT has completed it's testing.

Showing 5ghz clock confirmation with CPU-Z running and the IBT successful completion at the 5ghz clock, is solid confirmation of the overclock.

Not bad for a traditional water cooling loop setup by the way! :) 

September 16, 2013 5:45:07 PM

Like I said, I'm a noob. I don't even know what speed step is, I simply used Ai Suite 3 and it set everything automatically. Will do that later today, thanks.
September 16, 2013 11:58:20 PM

Better?:

a c 249 K Overclocking
a c 110 à CPUs
September 17, 2013 1:12:51 AM

Congratulations Impressive Overclock! :) 

What are your IBT load temperatures @ the 5ghz clock?
a c 143 K Overclocking
a b å Intel
a c 245 à CPUs
September 17, 2013 1:37:28 AM

What was the 5GHz core voltage under load DTH as reported by CPU-z?
a b K Overclocking
a b à CPUs
September 17, 2013 2:08:27 AM

i don't want to sound sceptical but i could post the same image doing the test and changing the clock speed in alsuite opening cpu-z and looking like i just completed a 5ghz test, but congratulations on getting the best i5 4670k chip there is
a c 150 K Overclocking
a b å Intel
a c 186 à CPUs
September 17, 2013 6:46:36 PM

OK I will actually update this weekend. I've just been pretty busy due to a glorious class called Chemistry Honors...
a c 427 K Overclocking
a c 127 å Intel
a c 1072 à CPUs
September 17, 2013 7:43:34 PM

Class is priority , take your time.
September 17, 2013 9:22:00 PM

kiezz said:
i don't want to sound sceptical but i could post the same image doing the test and changing the clock speed in alsuite opening cpu-z and looking like i just completed a 5ghz test, but congratulations on getting the best i5 4670k chip there is


Hard crowd to impress lol. I don't know how else to do it to prove it to you... I did have a play around with it beforehand and also had it running beautifully at 4.9:



Also tried to step it up to 5.1. Ai Suite seemed to think it was ok, but IBT and other load testing didn't agree lol:



Ai Suite has to reset your PC to change clock speed so I don't understand how you could post an image doing the same test?
a b K Overclocking
a b à CPUs
September 18, 2013 4:37:35 AM

I have alsuite i know you don't have to restart to change clock speeds or voltage, look if you got 5ghz stable good on you im not a moderator to judge if its true or not, to me the images you upload seem evasive always with a blocked view of something but it looks like other more experienced overclockers are convinced so thats fair enough

heres a 4.4ghz stress test i did and then changed settings via alsuite to 4.6ghz, opened cpu-z and took a snip of it



Uploaded with ImageShack.us" alt="" class="imgLz frmImg " />

its not impossible to do it with 5ghz
a c 249 K Overclocking
a c 110 à CPUs
September 18, 2013 4:52:25 AM

kiezz said:
I have alsuite i know you don't have to restart to change clock speeds or voltage, look if you got 5ghz stable good on you im not a moderator to judge if its true or not, to me the images you upload seem evasive always with a blocked view of something but it looks like other more experienced overclockers are convinced so thats fair enough

its not impossible to do it with 5ghz


If we've come to the point that users photoshop in false information then we've lost our own satisfaction of reaching these overclocks and being proud of what we accomplished and want to share it with others.

You're coming across as accusing DTH of posting false data, my initial questions were simply to get all his screenshot on the same picture, not saying it wasn't legitimate results, I did ask for load temperature readings as I'm still interested in what they are, but just for my own knowledge.

Obviously DTH has one very high quality CPU in his possession to even reach these overclock levels at all water cooling, so I think that's why the results seem shocking to all of us. Ryan

a b K Overclocking
a b à CPUs
September 18, 2013 5:27:41 AM

Quote:
If we've come to the point that users photoshop in false information then we've lost our own satisfaction of reaching these overclocks and being proud of what we accomplished and want to share it with others.

You're coming across as accusing DTH of posting false data, my initial questions were simply to get all his screenshot on the same picture, not saying it wasn't legitimate results, I did ask for load temperature readings as I'm still interested in what they are, but just for my own knowledge.

Obviously DTH has one very high quality CPU in his possession to even reach these overclock levels at all water cooling, so I think that's why the results seem shocking to all of us. Ryan


its not photoshopped just changed settings after the stress test,
in the 5ghz shot cpu-z shows core voltage at 0.8v to me thats amazing but your right i made an accusation i shouldn't have and im sorry for that,
its a very good achievement hitting 5ghz
a c 143 K Overclocking
a b å Intel
a c 245 à CPUs
September 18, 2013 5:58:48 AM

kiezz said:
Quote:
If we've come to the point that users photoshop in false information then we've lost our own satisfaction of reaching these overclocks and being proud of what we accomplished and want to share it with others.

You're coming across as accusing DTH of posting false data, my initial questions were simply to get all his screenshot on the same picture, not saying it wasn't legitimate results, I did ask for load temperature readings as I'm still interested in what they are, but just for my own knowledge.

Obviously DTH has one very high quality CPU in his possession to even reach these overclock levels at all water cooling, so I think that's why the results seem shocking to all of us. Ryan


its not photoshopped just changed settings after the stress test,
in the 5ghz shot cpu-z shows core voltage at 0.8v to me thats amazing but your right i made an accusation i shouldn't have and im sorry for that,
its a very good achievement hitting 5ghz


Since the Stresstest is over, the voltage should return to idle. Thus I asked what his voltage under load was...
a b K Overclocking
a b à CPUs
September 18, 2013 6:03:13 AM

ok even with speedstep disabled? like i said earlier if you guys are convinced im sorry for the accusation
a c 143 K Overclocking
a b å Intel
a c 245 à CPUs
September 18, 2013 6:07:06 AM

kiezz said:
ok even with speedstep disabled? like i said earlier if you guys are convinced im sorry for the accusation


Since he is inexperienced, I doubt speedstep is disabled. :) 
September 18, 2013 2:41:00 PM

4Ryan6 said:
Congratulations Impressive Overclock! :) 

What are your IBT load temperatures @ the 5ghz clock?


Have just download the core temp program, so I will give you a definitive answer later :) 
a b K Overclocking
a b à CPUs
September 18, 2013 2:43:20 PM

DTH said:
4Ryan6 said:
Congratulations Impressive Overclock! :) 

What are your IBT load temperatures @ the 5ghz clock?


Have just download the core temp program, so I will give you a definitive answer later :) 


That sounds fishy, no sane person would stress test a CPU at 5ghz without checking the temps. ;) 
September 18, 2013 9:31:38 PM

Ai Suite shows temp, just not very well...
a c 249 K Overclocking
a c 110 à CPUs
September 19, 2013 1:45:36 AM

Real Temp, is the best temperature monitoring utility for Intel CPUs, it holds and displays a minimum and maximum temperature level reached, and was designed for Intel CPUs.

http://www.techpowerup.com/realtemp/
a b K Overclocking
a b à CPUs
September 19, 2013 3:01:20 AM

DTH said:
Ai Suite shows temp, just not very well...


yeah you would think all the effort asus put into the software it would at least give decent temperature readings
a c 143 K Overclocking
a b å Intel
a c 245 à CPUs
September 19, 2013 3:19:43 AM

kiezz said:
DTH said:
Ai Suite shows temp, just not very well...


yeah you would think all the effort asus put into the software it would at least give decent temperature readings


I do not think coding is the problem. Think they are using TCase instead of TJMax. WHich is dumb.
a b K Overclocking
a b à CPUs
September 19, 2013 3:35:55 AM

Novuake said:

I do not think coding is the problem. Think they are using TCase instead of TJMax. WHich is dumb.


whatever there using you can hit core temp of 80c and there temperature reading is still around 60c its something to watch out for if using there fan control software as there preset profiles won't hit 100% fan speed until 70c-75c on there reading, I reckon your cpu would be throttling by then
a c 143 K Overclocking
a b å Intel
a c 245 à CPUs
September 19, 2013 4:13:52 AM

kiezz said:
Novuake said:

I do not think coding is the problem. Think they are using TCase instead of TJMax. WHich is dumb.


whatever there using you can hit core temp of 80c and there temperature reading is still around 60c its something to watch out for if using there fan control software as there preset profiles won't hit 100% fan speed until 70c-75c on there reading, I reckon your cpu would be throttling by then


Well TCase CAN be 20C behind Core temp. So not surprising.
Not saying you should use it, just trying to figure out their method...
a c 249 K Overclocking
a c 110 à CPUs
September 29, 2013 10:03:20 AM

When are the results going to get updated?
a c 150 K Overclocking
a b å Intel
a c 186 à CPUs
September 30, 2013 9:06:00 PM

4Ryan6 said:
When are the results going to get updated?


When I fix my Chemistry Honors grade...

I'll try to update when the workload dies down. I will most likely update October 14th or maybe even sooner. But my focus currently is school work and that priority will not change. Again, sorry guys for delaying the chart updating.
a b à CPUs
October 1, 2013 5:01:07 PM

Well, here I am again!

I updated my rig with a new processor. I had the luck to change my processor with a couple of bucks more and grab a new i5 3570k

Here are my results

http://valid.canardpc.com/3j5rcn

Mobo> Asrock z68 Extreme7 Gen3
RAM> Corsair vengeance 8Gb 1330mhz cl9 (im too lazy to overclock them, but actually im having troubles with my mobo and its slots)
Processor> I5 3570k @ 4.5 ghz 1.23 vcore
GPU> HD6950 2gb @900mhz
Custom watercooling set up, single 120mm rad + 240mm. CPU + GPU in the same loop.

This how it look so far.

a c 249 K Overclocking
a c 110 à CPUs
October 1, 2013 5:22:28 PM

amuffin said:
4Ryan6 said:
When are the results going to get updated?


When I fix my Chemistry Honors grade...

I'll try to update when the workload dies down. I will most likely update October 14th or maybe even sooner. But my focus currently is school work and that priority will not change. Again, sorry guys for delaying the chart updating.


School is much more important!

Best to you amuffin! Ryan

October 5, 2013 12:40:56 PM

Name: Krlos
CPU: i5-4670K
Motherboard: Msi Z87-G43
CPU Voltage: 1.185V
CPU Bus Speed/Multiplier: 100*45
Clock Speed: 4.5ghz
GPU: GTX 770 SC w/ ACX
RAM: Crucial Ballistix 1866 Mhz DDR3 10-10-10-29-2T
Cooling: Cooler Master Hyper 212+
OS:Windows 7 Ultimate 64 Bit
CPU-Z Validation:

Uploaded with ImageShack.com
October 7, 2013 11:22:59 AM

Novuake said:
Danra said:
amuffin said:
Danra said:
I do not put any hope on Haswell.

Intel is more concerned with GPU power than CPU, they want to dominate low end video.


It's all about more performance/watt!


If you notice Intel GPU performance is growing much faster than CPU, so, it is obvious that Intel wants the low end GPU market, for now. If the market allows faster CPU/GPUs then I suspect that GPU can reach the lower mid-range performance. This is exactly what Nvidea and AMD do not want.


If they can make their multi monitor support easier and more compatible then they would not have much loss in revenue as low end GPUs are bought not for gaming, but for multi-monitors. As long as Intel remains under the HD77xx range of cards, Nvidia and AMD should not lose much.


Most of ATI's income was from "low end" integrated graphics, after AMD purchased ATI, I did not see a slow down of the desire for low end onboard graphics sector profit.

Of course, that is changing, as referred to in my post above.
October 14, 2013 1:22:18 PM

http://valid.canardpc.com/b9uud8

i7-4960X @ 4.7
64GB DDR3 2133 GSkill Ripjaw Z Quad Channel
ASUS RIVE
VCore 1.450
100 mhz x 47 MP
H110 top mounted in HAF 942
Sapphire 7950 x 2 in Crossfire
Win 7 Pro

Uploaded with ImageShack.com" alt="" class="imgLz frmImg " />


October 14, 2013 1:29:39 PM

i want to get to 5.0, but seems like it gets exponentially difficult with these six core IB chips after 4.7. anyone else have any ideas?
    • First
    • Previous
    • 9 / 12
    • 10
    • 11
    • 12
    • More pages
    • Next
    • Newest
      • 1
      • 2
      • 3
      • 4
      • 5
      • 6
      • 7
      • 8
      • 9 / 12
      • 10
!