Is it safe to OC 1600 to 1866? Please Help..

19nero68

Honorable
Jun 4, 2012
102
0
10,680
My question might be a little newbish, I built my 1st own system or gave any thought to the usual head scratching in regards to bottlenecks, system limitations, actual vs. claimed specs, etc.

I have a ASRock 970 Extreme 4 MoBo and the specs said that it can handle everywhere from 1033 to 2100 RAM speed. I want to go with 1866..

so i bought GSkill Ares 1866 4gb(x2)..
my FX4100 CPU can handle 1866 of memory..

but when i look at bios..

DRAM CONFIG

if i'm not mistaken it is called "Profile"
9-10-9-28 1.50v DDR3 1866 is indicated in there.

but on DRAM Frequency.. it is set as "auto" and set as DDR3-1600..
________________

What if i change the frequency to 1866? is it safe?

please help.. thanks a lot in advance.. =) :pt1cable:
 

19nero68

Honorable
Jun 4, 2012
102
0
10,680

19nero68

Honorable
Jun 4, 2012
102
0
10,680


what's the best potential i can get with my 8gb Gskill Ares 1866 (2x4gb) with my MoBo Asrock 970 Extreme 4..

in bios, in DRAM timing control..
i saw this,

CAS# Latency (tCL) - 9
(in description: Min 5, Max14)

RAS# to CAS# Delay (tRCD) - 10
(in description: Min 5, Max19)

Row Precharge Time (tRP) - 9
(in description: Min 5, Max19)

RAS# Active Time (tRAS) - 28
(in description: Min 15, Max40)

can you suggest a good timing that my components can handle??
 

19nero68

Honorable
Jun 4, 2012
102
0
10,680


heres the result.. i dont know how to understand the result. =( i'm newbie..

Mem-Copy: 12839 MB/s
Mem-Read: 10168 MB/s
Mem-Write: 8546 MB/s

Reached memory score: 9.36 GB/s
Mem-Latency: 67.2 ns
 

19nero68

Honorable
Jun 4, 2012
102
0
10,680


man i changed it to 9-10-9-28 then after saving and exit..
at windows start up.. i encountered blue screen.. then asking to launch windows for repair or start windows normally..

why did it happened?
 

19nero68

Honorable
Jun 4, 2012
102
0
10,680


man how would i compare results?
in reached memory score i think the highest is the fastest? am i right?

but in the latency score? the lower the better??
 
i'm sorry if you hard and difficult to translate my language ... it's just different gap :D
... yes right in above , highest is better and low latency is better
ex. test compare as long as stable and no BSOD :
1600 9-10-9-28 score : 92 latency 46 stable/ no BSOD ... keep at screenshot
1866 9-9-9-28 score : 102 latency 46 stable / no BSOD .... keep at screenshoot

and than setting your PC at higher score and ignore latency and keep it ... i think you know wich better :D