Motherboard, graphics for athlon x4 630 system

I'm putting together a new system and have decided on the Athlon II x4 630, as it can be had for $113 now, and it seems to be comparable to the Phenom II x3 720 in performance. I've read through all of the debates on that topic. I use the system primarily for web, office apps and watching videos and such. But every few months I get into gaming and like to have a system that doesn't disappoint me for this; I hate having to turn games down to low settings.
Anyway, I'm going for the x4 630, and since the price is about the same I want to go with DDR3-1333 for RAM - hopefully 4gb, although I might start out with 2gb.
So that leaves me with a motherboard and graphics to decide on. Since I plan on getting a graphics card, I don't need it onboard, so thinking of saving a bit of money here by going with a 770. Thoughts? So far I know I need an AM3, and would like it to support up to 16GB of RAM. I doubt I will be needing crossfire down the line, so can cut that out as well.
Graphics is the next big hurdle. Initially I was looking at the HD4670, based on the most recent Best Graphics Guide, as things seemed to get a bit murky until a big jump in price. I've heard people raving about the HD4850, but since their price has gone up, they don't sound like they are as good of a deal. Any recommendations?
For both the motherboard and GPU, I don't have a set budget, but since I don't end up actually doing that much gaming, I don't want to waste too much money unnecessarily. I'm going to also have to get a new case and probably a new PSU, as they haven't been upgraded for years.
Oh, one final question - sound cards. I'm probably dating myself, but I no longer see them mentioned. Is onboard sound the standard now, and I can stop thinking about that piece of the puzzle?
10 answers Last reply Best Answer
More about motherboard graphics athlon system
  1. Onboard sound is generally decent. You can try onboard and always add a XiFi (or whatever) sound card later.

    A 770 socket AM3 motherboard with DDR3 RAM is a great option.

    Without knowing your monitor resolution and what games you generally play its hard to judge what graphics make sense. The 4670 is the low end of gaming cards and can only play well at low monitor resolutions or settings, but may suit your needs.

    If you don't have your heart set on 1300, this ASUS board is solid, but max of 1066:

    Regarding a sound card. Today's motherboards have excellent onboard and I would suggest trying it before spending money on a sound card.

    I'll leave the GPU question for others to answer. I have the 4850 on this computer and just installed a 4670 on a unit I'm building for work.

    Good luck!
  3. I have an old SB X-Fir card in my current setup I can use if necessary. My monitor is a Dell S2409W 24 inch Widescreen Flat Panel Monitor, that I generally use at 1920x1080.
    In terms of games, I've dabbled with L4D and Crysis in the past few months, and will probably be playing some COD Modern Warfare 2 and the Wolfenstein. Other than older games, I usually only go for single-player FPS.
  4. cmichael138 said:

    If you don't have your heart set on 1300, this ASUS board is solid, but max of 1066:
    Why get old AM2/DDR2 motherboards when you can get AM3/DDR3 at the same price point? DDR2 RAM is getting expensive and hard to find as its production is being dropped in favor of DDR3.
  5. 1920X1080 is a big resolution.

    To looks like L4D at low settings/no aa should work great with a 4670.,1488.html
    Wont quite cut it at very high settings, but might well manage high.,1455.html

    Crysis it will not likely play anything but minimum settings. Crysis is a hog.

    The Gigabyte 770 that alx13 linked is a new board with USB3 and SATA 6GB. Seems like a good deal for the price.
  6. If I don't see myself using USB3 or SATA 6GB, is there any compelling reason for me to go with the GIGABYTE or ASUS, at nearly twice the price of the other two boards?

    What GPU would you recommend as a step up from the 4670? Is the 4850 still a good deal, at around $117 now, or is there something else that would offer better value?
  7. Best answer
    ASRock and ECS have a higher percent chance of a bad motherboard than ASUS and Gigabyte. You can always go for the cheap board and probably get one that isnt trash. With more reputable brands you are paying for higher quality components (capacitors, voltage regulators, PCB, etc) and better manufacturing quality control.

    The older Gigabyte 770 is only $80. For $20 extra I would take it over the ASRock.

    You might be surprised in a year how valuable USB3 has become (look hpw popular USB2 is now), or maybe not. Its a guess you have to make for yourself.

    Next step up in graphics is the GTS 250, HD 4850 or HD 5750. All perform about the same. The 5750 may be a bit more expensive but has DX11 and is better as a home theater card. The 5770 is 50% faster and may not be much more expensive than those 3 for the performance increase it gives. It will play at 1920x1080 quite well, including crysis at medium settings.
  8. OK, I think I'm going to go for the Gigabyte, and go with the 5770 on the GPU. Thanks for your help.
  9. Best answer selected by alx13.
Ask a new question

Read More

New Build Motherboards Graphics Systems Product