Msi Lightning GTX680 3D Mark 11 Score.




I can't wait for mine to arrive.
My rig is going to be amazing. <3
18 answers Last reply
More about lightning gtx680 mark score
  1. I'm tempted to purchase a second one and sli. Anyones opinions? :3
  2. I would and I will be getting two as soon as I have the money to do so. I think two of the 4gb model will do nicely.
  3. Heaven Benchmark v3.0 Basic



    FPS:


    52.6


    Scores:


    1326


    Min FPS:


    26.9


    Max FPS:


    132.1


    Hardware



    Binary:


    Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1600 Release Mar 7 2012


    Operating system:


    Windows 7 (build 7601, Service Pack 1) 64bit


    CPU model:


    Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz


    CPU flags:


    3818MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 SSE42 HTT


    GPU model:NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 9.18.13.479 2048Mb

    Settings
    Render:direct3d11
    Mode:1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen
    Shaders:high
    Textures:high
    Filter:trilinear
    Anisotropy:16x
    Occlusion:enabled
    Refraction:enabled
    Volumetric:enabled
    Tessellation:extreme

    2.2 more fps for $200 more, you decide?
  4. What are you talking about steven? lol
  5. Renzkuken1 said:
    What are you talking about steven? lol

    Sorry bad link, fixed
  6. I would rate these overclocked msi lightnings as 25-30% faster than an overclocked gtx670.
  7. How do you figure, my 670 is within 2.2 fps of it benched? 25-30% rofl
  8. Can you get an actual benchmark graph instead of wall of text lol
  9. Renzkuken1 said:
    Can you get an actual benchmark graph instead of wall of text lol


    Best i can do, any other way to link heaven results?
  10. Hmm not sure. What about a 3dmark11 result? I'll post all mine when i can build my comp next weekend. :D
  11. http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/840/benchv.png/
    3Dmark11 results are hard to compare to your graph, not sure what numbers their using/not using.

    http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/3894507 Graphics score:10747 vs http://www.guru3d.com/article/msi-geforce-gtx-680-lightning-review/22
  12. When comparing the 670 to the 680 the results are very close and some people will say that for the extra $100 or more it makes no sense to go with the 680. But it does seem to me that the 680 can get to a higher mhz and you will see more high end 680's come out and the 670 may not have the same top end and be able to keep up. The Evga Classified is at 1111mhz core speed and I think thast there will be higher and the Evga Hydro Copper is at 1150mhz core speed.
    For a time I was considering the 670 because of the price but slowly the higher core speed cards are starting to come out and some are able to go hiher so the end result will be the 680 getting better fps at a higher clock , not sure that the 670 will get that high.
  13. inzone said:
    When comparing the 670 to the 680 the results are very close and some people will say that for the extra $100 or more it makes no sense to go with the 680. But it does seem to me that the 680 can get to a higher mhz and you will see more high end 680's come out and the 670 may not have the same top end and be able to keep up. The Evga Classified is at 1111mhz core speed and I think thast there will be higher and the Evga Hydro Copper is at 1150mhz core speed.
    For a time I was considering the 670 because of the price but slowly the higher core speed cards are starting to come out and some are able to go hiher so the end result will be the 680 getting better fps at a higher clock , not sure that the 670 will get that high.


    Mine is currently stable at 1290 core and 3787 mem, thats +140 core and +780 mem. Had core up to around 1330 and +800 mem stable in heaven but bf3 was having issues so i toned it back. Pretty happy with my luck of the draw.
  14. That's nice when you get the better gpu that's very clockable , would be nice if they were all like that.
    The question keeps going around and around in my head , why is this like this , why is the 670 so close to the 680 in performance? Why did Nvidia do this ? It really makes no sense.
  15. inzone said:
    That's nice when you get the better gpu that's very clockable , would be nice if they were all like that.
    The question keeps going around and around in my head , why is this like this , why is the 670 so close to the 680 in performance? Why did Nvidia do this ? It really makes no sense.


    Yeah i agree it's wild, might as well take advantage while we can ;)
  16. Of course what is better is to have two of the same.
  17. I really have no idea why nvidia did this crap this year.
    All their top cards only have minor differences of 5-10% at most including both being overclocked that sometimes can level the differences and make them equal, why pay 100$ for 5% more performance? (wow so X card has 10 more fps in BF3 than Y card, guess I'd better hand over like 60$ more so nvidia won't get upset) Last year you could upgrade from something like 450 to 560 for less than that price and get double performance... Now you pay 100$ for 5% more fps in some games and in a benchmark when you could get a 660 that's a bit slower but costs 2 times less. It makes no sense? They're like... competing with themselves. Releasing a bit slower cards with better and better price/performance ratio... They're kinda creating an AMD in their own company, like some bipolar kid, one half of their products are overpriced and the other half has great price/performance ratio but why kill the chance of people buying your own products? shouldn't they focus on removing AMD as a competition?
  18. I did heaven benchmark and got average of 90fps with score of 2300
Ask a new question

Read More

Graphics Cards 3D Overclocking MSI-Microstar