Hello! Looking for a little feedback, if that's possible. I'm looking to upgrade my computer to give it a little more power, but I don't have the funds (nor will I in the near future) to overhaul my entire system, so I've decided I should change the CPU. Unfortunately, my motherboard is getting a little dated, and I've had difficulty over the last few weeks determining what would be the best fit.
Here are my system specs:
IN9 32X-MAX 680i
e4300 Core 2 Duo 1.8GHz (3.0GHz OC)
A-DATA 2x2GB DDR2 800
Zotac 8800GT 512MB 700MHz
BFG 8800GT OCX 512MB 700MHz
Cooler Master Real Power Pro 750W
At first I thought I should go with a quad, but after doing some research I'm not so sure anymore. While I know 680i quad support is spotty, I've been able to determine that my board will support a q9550. However, it doesn't seem like I'll be able to overclock at all, so for argument's sake I'm assuming that if I went with a q9550 it would be running at stock speed of 2.88. While it seems that support for the older q6600 is much more solid, I haven't been able to find anyone running an in9 32x Max that has been able to achieve an OC of over 3.0, and so I'm also assuming that the maximum speed I'll be able to attain with the q6600 is similar to what I'd see with a q9550.
In terms of dual cores, it would seem possible to achieve a minimum of 3.2 with an e8400. While I'm not sure exactly of what the maximum overclock is with an e8xxx on my mobo, it would seem to be somewhere within the mid 3s.
To further complicate matters, I'm living in Europe, where prices seem to be a bit higher, and where there is less chance of finding used/cheap parts. On eBay I've found that the price of a q6600 varies anywhere from between 100 (used) to 150 euros (new), while a q9550 will run me about 200 (new w/ e0). An e8400 seems to cost about the same amount as a q6600, while the e8500 hovers around 160 to 170 euros.
What would be the difference (if any) of a q6600 at 3.0 vs a q9550 at stock (aside from temps)? I'm not concerned about the future overclock potential with a different mobo, because if I ever do change my motherboard it will probably be to make the jump to a new CPU socket type. What about the difference between an e8400 at 3.2 and a q6600 at 3.0? What would enable me to make the best of my SLI setup?
If anyone has any input I would greatly appreciate it. My system is primarily used for gaming, with Bad Company 2 being my primary focus as of the moment. Aside from (possibly) adding more ram, I don't really plan on upgrading this system any further within the next 2 years. Maybe switch out the 8800GT's for a new, single card, but only if I really start to need it.
Here are my system specs:
IN9 32X-MAX 680i
e4300 Core 2 Duo 1.8GHz (3.0GHz OC)
A-DATA 2x2GB DDR2 800
Zotac 8800GT 512MB 700MHz
BFG 8800GT OCX 512MB 700MHz
Cooler Master Real Power Pro 750W
At first I thought I should go with a quad, but after doing some research I'm not so sure anymore. While I know 680i quad support is spotty, I've been able to determine that my board will support a q9550. However, it doesn't seem like I'll be able to overclock at all, so for argument's sake I'm assuming that if I went with a q9550 it would be running at stock speed of 2.88. While it seems that support for the older q6600 is much more solid, I haven't been able to find anyone running an in9 32x Max that has been able to achieve an OC of over 3.0, and so I'm also assuming that the maximum speed I'll be able to attain with the q6600 is similar to what I'd see with a q9550.
In terms of dual cores, it would seem possible to achieve a minimum of 3.2 with an e8400. While I'm not sure exactly of what the maximum overclock is with an e8xxx on my mobo, it would seem to be somewhere within the mid 3s.
To further complicate matters, I'm living in Europe, where prices seem to be a bit higher, and where there is less chance of finding used/cheap parts. On eBay I've found that the price of a q6600 varies anywhere from between 100 (used) to 150 euros (new), while a q9550 will run me about 200 (new w/ e0). An e8400 seems to cost about the same amount as a q6600, while the e8500 hovers around 160 to 170 euros.
What would be the difference (if any) of a q6600 at 3.0 vs a q9550 at stock (aside from temps)? I'm not concerned about the future overclock potential with a different mobo, because if I ever do change my motherboard it will probably be to make the jump to a new CPU socket type. What about the difference between an e8400 at 3.2 and a q6600 at 3.0? What would enable me to make the best of my SLI setup?
If anyone has any input I would greatly appreciate it. My system is primarily used for gaming, with Bad Company 2 being my primary focus as of the moment. Aside from (possibly) adding more ram, I don't really plan on upgrading this system any further within the next 2 years. Maybe switch out the 8800GT's for a new, single card, but only if I really start to need it.