I just got a new 750GB 7200rpm HDD for my laptop and it should be here Thur. or Fri. I got some questions pertaining to the usability and performance. First of all let me say I will be loading Windows 7 for sure and I'm considering dual booting 7/XP which would obviously require multiple partitions, but even in the case that I load only windows 7, I was planning on doing a dedicated partition for the OS/apps.
My first concern/question is about the usability. The "desktop" is part of your C: drive and with having the C: drive being on a dedicated small partition just for OS/apps that means that anything I place from any subsequent "storage" partitions onto the desktop will not just "move" there it will be copied there and I will then have 2 copies (one on each partition) correct? Is there anyway to avoid this issue? Maybe a way to have the windows desktop be linked to a different partition OTHER than the one the OS is located on? Or a way to set it up so anything I "move" (select and drag) to the desktop (from another partition) automatically places a shortcut only rather than actually copying the file(s)? I often place things I'm currently working with on the desktop or move/copy/save something there temporarily and then put them back in the folder I store them in.
Second concern/question is about the performance. With having such a large drive it would take forever to defrag it, so I'm trying to plan ahead. Would it make sense to have a dedicated partition in the range of 50-100gb just as a scratch drive? I do a lot of downloading of often times large files and move/copy stuff around quite a bit. My drives often get really fragmented really quickly because of this, which is why I’m asking about a scratch drive. For example, in one "session" I might download 10 1gb videos (that all come rar'd and split into 10 files), so that’s 100 files, 10GB's. Then I'll assemble/extract the videos and I'll have 110 files, 20Gb's. Then I might copy the extracted videos over to an external drive and delete them from the original drive. That is just one example and I do it often so you can see how the drive would get fragmented rather quickly.... hence the idea for the scratch drive. What do you think will it help?
And finally, again pertaining to the performance, if I did go ahead and make the scratch drive, how much of a performance hit will I take when trying to access files from 2 or 3 partitions at once? First you got main OS/apps partition which will obviously have to be accessed at some times... then say I am working with a file in the main storage partition, while uploading/downloading a file on the scratch partition.... is it going to end up hurting more than helping by having that extra scratch partition?
My first concern/question is about the usability. The "desktop" is part of your C: drive and with having the C: drive being on a dedicated small partition just for OS/apps that means that anything I place from any subsequent "storage" partitions onto the desktop will not just "move" there it will be copied there and I will then have 2 copies (one on each partition) correct? Is there anyway to avoid this issue? Maybe a way to have the windows desktop be linked to a different partition OTHER than the one the OS is located on? Or a way to set it up so anything I "move" (select and drag) to the desktop (from another partition) automatically places a shortcut only rather than actually copying the file(s)? I often place things I'm currently working with on the desktop or move/copy/save something there temporarily and then put them back in the folder I store them in.
Second concern/question is about the performance. With having such a large drive it would take forever to defrag it, so I'm trying to plan ahead. Would it make sense to have a dedicated partition in the range of 50-100gb just as a scratch drive? I do a lot of downloading of often times large files and move/copy stuff around quite a bit. My drives often get really fragmented really quickly because of this, which is why I’m asking about a scratch drive. For example, in one "session" I might download 10 1gb videos (that all come rar'd and split into 10 files), so that’s 100 files, 10GB's. Then I'll assemble/extract the videos and I'll have 110 files, 20Gb's. Then I might copy the extracted videos over to an external drive and delete them from the original drive. That is just one example and I do it often so you can see how the drive would get fragmented rather quickly.... hence the idea for the scratch drive. What do you think will it help?
And finally, again pertaining to the performance, if I did go ahead and make the scratch drive, how much of a performance hit will I take when trying to access files from 2 or 3 partitions at once? First you got main OS/apps partition which will obviously have to be accessed at some times... then say I am working with a file in the main storage partition, while uploading/downloading a file on the scratch partition.... is it going to end up hurting more than helping by having that extra scratch partition?