9800 GTS vs GTX 260

I have a question to why my GTX 260 is getting pooped on by a 9800 gts a friend of mine has, our systems are nearly the same. Given that I have more ram then he, and he has a 1200watt PSU over my 530 watt PSU. The stats are the same, different hardware of course. Useing Resident Evil 6 Benchmark he recives about 45-50 fps, with the same settings (Full Everything) I am getting only 25-30fps. Any sugesions?

System:
EVGA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 896MB 448-bit GDDR3 / CORSAIR XMS2 6GB (3 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 / AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Windsor 3.0GHz Socket AM2 125W Dual-Core / ASUS M3A78-EM AM2+/AM2 AMD 780G HDMI Micro ATX AMD Motherboard / RAIDMAX HYBRID 530W 12V V2.2/ EPS12V SLI Ready CrossFire Ready PSU
41 answers Last reply
More about 9800
  1. AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Windsor 3.0GHz Socket AM2

    I think we found the botlteneck
  2. The CPU runs at about 60-70%, like I said my friend has the same CPU. His isnt bottlenecking. Now like in wow I get like 14fps in one of the citys because my CPU is at 98-100. Thats bottlenecking.
  3. He's not talking about bottle necks. He wants to know why he is getting slower performance than his friend who has similar system settings.

    Anyways, I also have a GTX 260 216shader. I'm running a E5200 dual core 2.5gig 4gigs of ram. In resident evil 5 1680x1050 max settings I reach 40-50 FPS on the tests. There must be something wrong with your system. I don't know what though.


    Is that AMD of yours a dual core? If it is, then you should get better performance than me because I'm only 2.5gig dual core.
  4. it says up there on my system Dual - Core =P =)
  5. tuesday0180 said:
    Is that AMD of yours a dual core? If it is, then you should get better performance than me because I'm only 2.5gig dual core.

    The two chips you are comparing have an entirely different architecture and cannot meaningfully be compared by clock speed. Your 2.5 ghz processor is actually better than his 3 ghz.
    BTW you should overclock that E5200. It overclocks very well and should easily get up to 3.3-3.5ghz just on the stock cooler. Close to 4 ghz with a good fan/heatsink.
  6. jyjjy said:
    The two chips you are comparing have an entirely different architecture and cannot meaningfully be compared by clock speed. Your 2.5 ghz processor is actually better than his 3 ghz.
    BTW you should overclock that E5200. It overclocks very well and should easily get up to 3.3-3.5ghz just on the stock cooler. Close to 4 ghz with a good fan/heatsink.


    Aww i see. I would love to overclock, but my elite group motherboard doesn't allow it.

    Anyways I still think he should get better frames in his resident evil game. My FPS jumped significantly when I went from a 9500gt to a 260gtx 216shader. I think the game is very graphic card intensive.
  7. an x2 6000+ would be a pain to overclock, although i see no reason how a 3.0ghz am2 would bottleneck a gtx260.

    i would assume you failed to install (this happens all the time) "AMD DUAL CORE OPTIMIZER", which is pretty much essential to having an old athlon x2.

    check your heat levels as well as the old x2 6000+ was still based on a 90nm process (if i remember correctly).


    Quote:
    Aww i see. I would love to overclock, but my elite group motherboard doesn't allow it.


    you shouldve went with a similarly priced msi. 3.5ghz in a snap.
  8. From Tomshardware's Building a Balanced PC part 1, it showed that Nvidia cards are more CPU dependent than ATI cards, and that even a P2D E6300 @ 2.8GHz bottlenecked a GTX260 in some games.

    A PentiumDualCore E6300 is far superior to a E5300,
    A stock P2D E5300 equals a X2 7850,
    and a x2 7850 @ 2.8GHz is much better than a x2 6000 @ 3.0GHz

    http://www.anandtech.com/bench/default.aspx?p=28&p2=90


    But overall, your bottleneck shouldn't be that bad. So there must be something else involved...

    Did you have an ATI card before? Driver conflicts?
  9. What PSU is it?
  10. Quote:
    A PentiumDualCore E6300 is far superior to a E5300,
    A stock P2D E5300 equals a X2 7850,
    and a x2 7850 @ 2.8GHz is much better than a x2 6000 @ 3.0GHz

    http://www.anandtech.com/bench/def [...] p=28&p2=90


    if you're talking end-to-end numbers, from the link you posted, with regards to gaming, i cant seem to figure out how an x2 7850 is much better than the old x2 6000+.
  11. Bluescreendeath said:
    From Tomshardware's Building a Balanced PC part 1, it showed that Nvidia cards are more CPU dependent than ATI cards, and that even a P2D E6300 @ 2.8GHz bottlenecked a GTX260 in some games.

    A PentiumDualCore E6300 is far superior to a E5300,
    A stock P2D E5300 equals a X2 7850,
    and a x2 7850 @ 2.8GHz is much better than a x2 6000 @ 3.0GHz

    http://www.anandtech.com/bench/default.aspx?p=28&p2=90


    But overall, your bottleneck shouldn't be that bad. So there must be something else involved...

    Did you have an ATI card before? Driver conflicts?



    No I did not.
  12. wh3resmycar said:
    if you're talking end-to-end numbers, from the link you posted, with regards to gaming, i cant seem to figure out how an x2 7850 is much better than the old x2 6000+.

    It isn't. The two processors are about equal. In fact all of the processors he mentioned are pretty close together in terms of gaming performance.
  13. jyjjy said:
    It isn't. The two processors are about equal. In fact all of the processors he mentioned are pretty close together in terms of gaming performance.


    wh3resmycar said:
    if you're talking end-to-end numbers, from the link you posted, with regards to gaming, i cant seem to figure out how an x2 7850 is much better than the old x2 6000+.


    That was bad wording on my part. I was saying the E6300 is better than either of the AMD cpus, and even the E6300 is somewhat bottlenecking the GTX260.
  14. No one has mentioned this one:

    The motherboard has onboard graphics. Have they been disabled? You could be having conflicts between the 260 and the onboard.
  15. well as people said before:
    Make sure onboard graphics are disabled and install AMD's dual core optimizer
    If nothing changes, try switching Graphics Cards with your friend, maybe its a faulty card afterall

    Btw there is no 9800GTS its either a GT or a GTX, or maybe even a GTX+ (aka GTS 250) :pt1cable:
  16. I have not yet turned off the on board graphics. Im not sure how to for that matter. I will also have to install AMD's Dual-core optimizer. I will get back when I have done so.

    "Btw there is no 9800GTS its either a GT or a GTX, or maybe even a GTX+ (aka GTS 250)" In his nvida, and system information ,and along with the program Sandra adress his card as a 9800 gts. Maybe there is a glitch or something?, but three different resources wouldent be wrong I would assume.

    There is a 8800gts, but his resources still rep a 9800gts.
  17. Ehh, your right. In any matter im going to try and DL AMD's Dual-core optimizer, along with disableing the on board graphics first before buying a new processor. Thanks for all the help!
  18. Vertical Sync is off.
    I do have Windows 7 installed.

    I have three GB of ram because back when I wasent very computer savy I bought a 2GB stick from best buy to boost my old computers performance. Then about a year later I bought 2x2GB sticks from newegg.com and put those in the dual channel and then threw the old one in there aswell.
  19. The extra 2 GB of ram may be putting my system in single channel. I just thought of that, but im not sure. The speeds are the exact same.
  20. I just put in a AMD Phenom 9600 Agena 2.3GHz 4 x 512KB L2 Cache 2MB L3 Cache Socket AM2+ 95W Quad-Core Processor and ran a benchmark in RE5 and got 24.8 FPS(C). Two different processors with low, but average together benchmarks in a single game. Currently DLing
    http://www.futuremark.com/benchmar [...] /download/
  21. 3DMark Score - 8782 3DMarks

    SM 2.0 Score - 3203

    SM 3.0 Score - 4202

    CPU Score - 2723
  22. any clues?
  23. kylelively said:
    any clues?


    Instead of testing with other CPUs, you should try another GPU (your friends 9800GT) to eliminate the possibility of your GTX260 being faulty

    Also, ok this might seem stupid, but i assume your Pci-e is set to X16 right ?



  24. DISREGARD THIS IMAGE, READ THE POST BELOW
  25. Core is 754MHz
    Shaders is 1625MHz
    Memory is 1324MHz
    Congruent with a new version of evga precision.

    I did not have the right pref level set when I took that screen shot.
  26. I just uninstalled evga precision, and the nvidia drivers and reinstalled the nvidia drivers and my fps in a quick benchmark dint change.
  27. No I did not, a teacher of mine lent it to me.
  28. Reformat?
  29. If you mean reinstall the OS then give it a go.
  30. 1. CHECK UR PCI EXPRESS FIRST IS IT 16X OR 8X OR 4X...

    2. CHECK UR CARD ON UR FRIND SYSTEM IF IT WORK GOOD THERE THEN THE PROBLEM IS UR PSU MOST PROBABLY ...change PSU
  31. coldplayy said:
    1. CHECK UR PCI EXPRESS FIRST IS IT 16X OR 8X OR 4X...

    2. CHECK UR CARD ON UR FRIND SYSTEM IF IT WORK GOOD THERE THEN THE PROBLEM IS UR PSU MOST PROBABLY ...change PSU


    We already know the mobo, making 1. pointless.
  32. Quote:
    What?

    SPQR will know what I'm talking about. ;)
  33. Bluescreendeath said:
    SPQR will know what I'm talking about. ;)


    not really :p
  34. SPQR said:
    not really :p


    SPQR = Senatus Populusque Romanus ?
  35. Bluescreendeath said:
    SPQR = Senatus Populusque Romanus ?


    heh, my bad now i get it
    to my defense, english is not my native language :ange:
  36. SPQR said:
    heh, my bad now i get it
    to my defense, english is not my native language :ange:


    :lol: :D
  37. kylelively said:



    Looks like your card is waaaay underclocked..
  38. Its not underclocked, if you look at the post directly under the picture you will read that I said . . . .

    Core is 754MHz
    Shaders is 1625MHz
    Memory is 1324MHz
    Congruent with a new version of evga precision.


    I did not have the right pref level set when I took that screen shot.


    I have put the the Graphics card in another computer with a 650 PSU and the performance did not change.
  39. Now put your friends 9800GT in yours ...
  40. I did. The overall performance when down.












  41. An EVGA tech asked me to run tests using OCCT program, but on their ticket system you cannot upload .pgn images. So, I decided to post them here as a double reference to tomshardware community and the EVGA tech. If you have any comments or suggestions to these graphs please comment!
Ask a new question

Read More

Graphics Cards Gtx Graphics Product