First: These are my Specs:
2.8Ghz Pentium IV
2GB RAM
Sapphire HD4890
720 PSU
My benchmark results in World in conflict is
World in conflict (High)
1440x900 - average 9fps
Crysis (High)
1440x900 - Average (FRAPS) 12fps
But Lost Planet cranks out 30 to 40+ fps except on the first Benchmark Test (First Scene) where it falls to around 8fps at the worst point.
Now I am wondering. Is something bottlenecking this display card? Is it the processor?
Compared to my old Geforce 8600OC this card is a monster. But I'm just wondering since most of the benchmark tests of this card was done on a dual core (and they show 20+ fps for Crysis amongst others), it could be that I'm losing that extra 10fps through the CPU.
Does it make SUCH a difference? (If it is even that)
Thanks for reading this!
2.8Ghz Pentium IV
2GB RAM
Sapphire HD4890
720 PSU
My benchmark results in World in conflict is
World in conflict (High)
1440x900 - average 9fps
Crysis (High)
1440x900 - Average (FRAPS) 12fps
But Lost Planet cranks out 30 to 40+ fps except on the first Benchmark Test (First Scene) where it falls to around 8fps at the worst point.
Now I am wondering. Is something bottlenecking this display card? Is it the processor?
Compared to my old Geforce 8600OC this card is a monster. But I'm just wondering since most of the benchmark tests of this card was done on a dual core (and they show 20+ fps for Crysis amongst others), it could be that I'm losing that extra 10fps through the CPU.
Does it make SUCH a difference? (If it is even that)
Thanks for reading this!