Is there a third generation in the corner of these 2.5" SSD thats on the market today? The first had some kind of problems, the second have troubble with the SandForce controller to some MB and SATA 6 ports. Corsair and OCZ is the dominant manufactors sins their SSDs in (allmost) every SATA 6 modell have both read & write speed over 500 MB/s but use the SandForce controller, Intel and Kingston is only depressingly slow in comparence but use a "more stable" controller. In my mind the most logical question is if every one of these manufactors are going to produce a third wave of the SATA 6 bus interface or just keep on milking out the market untill the next bus (SATA 4) is standard?
Sins a good quality SSD is VERY expensive, you can get a WD VelociRaptor 300 GB HDD (still a extremely fast HDD) for the same price as an OZC Vertex 3 120 GB (both with the same bus speed of SATA 6), I still feel some resistence against those overprized SSDs what ever a benchmark shows. I use two SATA2 WD VelociRaptor 74 GB ICE in RAID 0 as system disk and when booting, Windows 7 plus every programs and apps, is up and running in only 30 seconds thus I have used my new PC for over a month! My old PC took over 2 minutes to completly boot up and in that chassi I used two 7200 RPM HDDs in RAID 0 mode. How much faster can a SATA3 SSD boot up with every normal Windows and apps running? The main question with my resoning is to make sure if I should wait a year or two to get more GB/money or just buy a SSD right now?
Of couse I have wet dreams about getting a OCZ RevoDrive That would be the best thing of all. Thus I wonder why they are so incredebly expensive? In fact a RevoDrive simply is based on a an idéa of using an old PCI card as a "HDD" instead of a mechanicle unit. Why this PCI-e 4x slot thinking? Why not simply build a BIG GPU-shaped flash storage (280x111x38mm like the 590GTX) and use it in a PCI-e 16x slot and use both sides of it as a "club sandwich"? Can someone please tell me what the difference between a SSD and a RevoDrive is (when not including the speed difference), when both of them use flash memorys? Is there a next generation of those drives comming using the same bus (SATA6) or must they first make a SATA 4 bus to get those existing cards to become cheeper?
Sins a good quality SSD is VERY expensive, you can get a WD VelociRaptor 300 GB HDD (still a extremely fast HDD) for the same price as an OZC Vertex 3 120 GB (both with the same bus speed of SATA 6), I still feel some resistence against those overprized SSDs what ever a benchmark shows. I use two SATA2 WD VelociRaptor 74 GB ICE in RAID 0 as system disk and when booting, Windows 7 plus every programs and apps, is up and running in only 30 seconds thus I have used my new PC for over a month! My old PC took over 2 minutes to completly boot up and in that chassi I used two 7200 RPM HDDs in RAID 0 mode. How much faster can a SATA3 SSD boot up with every normal Windows and apps running? The main question with my resoning is to make sure if I should wait a year or two to get more GB/money or just buy a SSD right now?
Of couse I have wet dreams about getting a OCZ RevoDrive That would be the best thing of all. Thus I wonder why they are so incredebly expensive? In fact a RevoDrive simply is based on a an idéa of using an old PCI card as a "HDD" instead of a mechanicle unit. Why this PCI-e 4x slot thinking? Why not simply build a BIG GPU-shaped flash storage (280x111x38mm like the 590GTX) and use it in a PCI-e 16x slot and use both sides of it as a "club sandwich"? Can someone please tell me what the difference between a SSD and a RevoDrive is (when not including the speed difference), when both of them use flash memorys? Is there a next generation of those drives comming using the same bus (SATA6) or must they first make a SATA 4 bus to get those existing cards to become cheeper?