- Jun 12, 2009
- 136
- 0
- 18,680
since BD wont be arriving to am3 boards, any reason to pick a gigabyte 890fx over gigabyte 890gx?
as far as i know the differences are back panel connections and gx only allows dual cards to run at 8x vs fx's 16x.
need gigabyte because i need 7+ sata connections and the asus only has 6.
everywhere i go people tell me to stay away from the gigabyte 890gx due to tons of problems with it, same as the msi 890fx another board i really liked the looks of.
im looking to put in a 1055t 95w and overclocking it to 4ghz with a corsair h70.
im not interested in running crossfire.
is the build quality on the gigabyte 890fx really that much nicer then the gigabyte 890gx or msi 890fx?
as far as i know the differences are back panel connections and gx only allows dual cards to run at 8x vs fx's 16x.
need gigabyte because i need 7+ sata connections and the asus only has 6.
everywhere i go people tell me to stay away from the gigabyte 890gx due to tons of problems with it, same as the msi 890fx another board i really liked the looks of.
im looking to put in a 1055t 95w and overclocking it to 4ghz with a corsair h70.
im not interested in running crossfire.
is the build quality on the gigabyte 890fx really that much nicer then the gigabyte 890gx or msi 890fx?
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram