Hello, I'm about to buy one of two Asus computers to replace my aging and dying desktop. Their prices are similar and the specs are exactly identical except for the processors. Which one is faster for multimedia graphic work and light gaming? I need to decided soon. Thanks for the help.
Passmark is not very accurate and you will notice no one uses it for any real comparisons.
According to the benchmark provided, I would say they are about the same at the moment with Q8400 being superior in apps that can utilize four cores.
In addition, more and more to-be-released apps/games will take the advantage of quad core CPUs and so I would take Q8400 over i5-650.
Ok Anandtech tells a different story. Some tasks are still better with the old quadcore, but I knew it was getting phased out and the i5 would have DDR3 ram. It's similar enough, but I'm not sure how I feel about the cpu graphics. Thanks. I used to know hardware, but haven't built or kept up with the knowledge since the ide to sata switch and these new i cores are confusing.
These were the two I was trying to decide on. The i5 had a free shipping code and the Q8300 would've been $10 more after shipping. I've ordered refurbished stuff from both of them before - hope this one works out too.
Agreed, the i5 tech will be current for years to come. They only perform similarly on anandtech because I'm looking at the Q8400. They only have that and the Q8200 on the charts. The sys I'm looking at is a Q8300 2.5 ghz, so I guess the i5 would still be better anyways. Just ordered it, but it doesn't say Win 7 - 64 bit. I'm assuming it has to be since it's more than 4 gigs ram, but maybe that's why it's cheap... hmm