Q6600 vs D510


I currently use a Q6600 @ 3.2 Ghz. I'm making the move towards Mini ITX. I could shell out £250+ and get myself a Zotac with socket 1156, plug in an i7 and have a great rig. Or, I could get the new intel atom d510 on an intel mobo for less than £50.

What will the experience be like with and Intel D510. Obviously only has 1mb cache, although is a dual core with HT. The Q6600 has 8Mb cache.

Looking around, the D510 scored 3.3 on some Vista experience chart, whereas the Q8300 only scored 3.4

Thoughts and input very welcome


4 answers Last reply
More about q6600 d510
  1. All Atom chips are TERRIBLE! steer well clear unless you want to be disapointed...
  2. I have been using an N450. Not too dissapointed. Obviously not as fast as the quad q6600.

    The atom 330 seems to run well (provided you are not doing intense multi tasking)

    And the D510 offers more. Would be interested to see benchmarks against a Q6600 or Q8300

    The cost is so different. I can put together a mini itx using a £50 mobo, old HDD, and spare 4-4-4-12 RAM i have sitting around.

    Or...I could shell out £100 mobo, £150 processor...etc etc

    Huge cost difference...
  3. The Atom CPU's are great for doing what they were designed to do. Unfortunately, that doesn't include running a full sized system.
  4. I am running a single process, using a program called Caseware IDEA. No multi-tasking. This software is a relational database analytics suite. So not processor intensive, but very memory intensive. Need a setup with seperate system / page file / IDEA temp drive...then it runs amazingly well.

    Don't see why it wouldn't run well as a standalone for a single process? max out with 4gb 4-4-4-12 RAM and 7200rpm drives (maybe an SSD). Install windows 7 and XP in dual boot config. All 32-bit

Ask a new question

Read More

CPUs Intel