Might want to indicate room (ambient) Temperatures. This is winter time and room temps can be 5 to 10 F cooler than Mid summer. I'm Quessing but your summar time temps will be about 5 C higher than Winter time temps
Is that the max that one of the 4 cores hit, or is it the single "average" temp. If Not the Core temp recommend you monitor the individual core temps - These four reading are more important.
If that is the Max core temp then Temperature looks real goog, Might see a 5C rise if you run it for total of 30 min which is still OK.
@ EliTheHopeful - If running Prime 95 for verifing system stability, 4 -> 8 Hours is recommended. HOWEVER to verify effectiveness of HSF you will find that temperatures will climb very quickly in first 5 to 10 miutes, then rise starts tappering off and reaching a Plateau at around 20->30 Minutes.
Prime95 will heat the CPU up MUCH more than games.
^ Far from garbage, when it come to testing a HSF effectiveness. Was the most commonly used program for HSF reviews.
Now I will agree that for verifing CPU/Memory stability You are correct that it is much Better (still far from Garbage)
To support your statement
Benefits of using Linpack:
1. More accurate than Prime95 Small FFTs/Blend (under x64 OS).
2. Takes less time to tell if your CPU/RAM is unstable than Prime95 (usually
something like 8 minutes Linpack vs 40 hours under Prime95).
3. Use the same stress-testing engine that Intel uses to test their products
before they are packed and put on shelves for sale.
Benefits of using IntelBurnTest:
1. Simplifies usage of Linpack.
2. Real-time output of results to the screen.
3. Simplifies the process of selecting a test size to use.
4. Better appearance.
5. Intuitive interface.
6. Real-time error checking.
7. System status acknowledgement.