Thanks in advance!
I currently have a Samsung SyncMaster 226BW 22-inch widescreen. Please see specs below. I purchased this monitor a few years ago.
When I compare my specs with new monitors from, Samsung, LG, etc... I see the main difference being contrast ratio. Obviously my measly 3000:1 DC can't compare to their 20,000 to 50,000:1 DC.
How big of a difference does this make? I use my monitor a lot, if I can make it easier on my eyes, I'm all for it.
So should I really upgrade? Is there that big of a difference? I have visited various stores, however the overhead lights are always killing any opinion you can make on their quality. = (
Again, thanks!
Panel Type
a-si TFT/TN
Viewable Size
22.0" Wide
Pixel Pitch
0.282mm
Brightness (typical)
300 cd/m2
Contrast Ratio (typical)
3000:1 DC
Response Time (typical)
2 ms (G to G)
Viewing Angles (H/V)
160˚/160˚
Native Resolution
1680 x 1050
Aspect Ratio
16:10
Maximum Color
16.7M
Interface
Analog/Digital
Input Video Signal
Analog RGB, TMDS Digital Link, DVI
I currently have a Samsung SyncMaster 226BW 22-inch widescreen. Please see specs below. I purchased this monitor a few years ago.
When I compare my specs with new monitors from, Samsung, LG, etc... I see the main difference being contrast ratio. Obviously my measly 3000:1 DC can't compare to their 20,000 to 50,000:1 DC.
How big of a difference does this make? I use my monitor a lot, if I can make it easier on my eyes, I'm all for it.
So should I really upgrade? Is there that big of a difference? I have visited various stores, however the overhead lights are always killing any opinion you can make on their quality. = (
Again, thanks!
Panel Type
a-si TFT/TN
Viewable Size
22.0" Wide
Pixel Pitch
0.282mm
Brightness (typical)
300 cd/m2
Contrast Ratio (typical)
3000:1 DC
Response Time (typical)
2 ms (G to G)
Viewing Angles (H/V)
160˚/160˚
Native Resolution
1680 x 1050
Aspect Ratio
16:10
Maximum Color
16.7M
Interface
Analog/Digital
Input Video Signal
Analog RGB, TMDS Digital Link, DVI