What problems can one have for not going for high end PSUs. Most people in Kolkata have very low budget for their systems. For example----
ASUS P5KPL AM/PS m/b
Intel Core2Duo E7500
2GB DDR2800 KVR single ch.
Sparkle nvidia 9500GT
Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 160GB
Sony DVD RAM drive
Samsung 1.44" floppy drive
Foxin 500W PSU (Rs600)
It is found that this system runs on Foxin 500W PSU worth Rs600 or similarly priced
Zebronics regular series 500W, or even on 500W Frontech (Rs500).
But I found from many reviewers and threads that one should not opt for anything less
than Corsair, best for this case is TX400.
If the machine runs smoothly without any problems on these (according to the world, disgusting) PSUs why SHOULD one go for TX400 with this system for Rs2700?
People say clean power delivery in corsair or other high end PSUs lower ripples etc, so
why do we need to think about them, will they have any adverse effect on the system,
if so how will it be the problem. I have seen nearly all people running their computers
trouble free years after years with Rs400 PSUs, if these are so unreliable then how is
this possible?
My system is-------
ASUS P5KPL AM/PS m/b
Intel Core2Duo E7400 (2.84/333)
2X 2GB DDR2800 KVR dual ch.
MSI ATI Radeon HD 4670 1GB DDR3 (800/950)
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 320GB
WD Caviar Blue 160GB
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium
HP DVD RAM drive
LG DVD RAM drive
Samsung 1.44" floppy drive
Zebronics 500W Platinum PSU (Rs2100)
Now my query is that in what way it would have been better if I would have opted
for Corsair TX400 PSU for Rs2700. One bad thing is that people over here already
call me mad for buying Rs2100 PSU instead of Rs500-600 ones. I went for this PSU
just for improved reliability, performance and stability, now the overall question is
that what's the use? Please explain me with respect to the example system and my
system.
ASUS P5KPL AM/PS m/b
Intel Core2Duo E7500
2GB DDR2800 KVR single ch.
Sparkle nvidia 9500GT
Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 160GB
Sony DVD RAM drive
Samsung 1.44" floppy drive
Foxin 500W PSU (Rs600)
It is found that this system runs on Foxin 500W PSU worth Rs600 or similarly priced
Zebronics regular series 500W, or even on 500W Frontech (Rs500).
But I found from many reviewers and threads that one should not opt for anything less
than Corsair, best for this case is TX400.
If the machine runs smoothly without any problems on these (according to the world, disgusting) PSUs why SHOULD one go for TX400 with this system for Rs2700?
People say clean power delivery in corsair or other high end PSUs lower ripples etc, so
why do we need to think about them, will they have any adverse effect on the system,
if so how will it be the problem. I have seen nearly all people running their computers
trouble free years after years with Rs400 PSUs, if these are so unreliable then how is
this possible?
My system is-------
ASUS P5KPL AM/PS m/b
Intel Core2Duo E7400 (2.84/333)
2X 2GB DDR2800 KVR dual ch.
MSI ATI Radeon HD 4670 1GB DDR3 (800/950)
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 320GB
WD Caviar Blue 160GB
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium
HP DVD RAM drive
LG DVD RAM drive
Samsung 1.44" floppy drive
Zebronics 500W Platinum PSU (Rs2100)
Now my query is that in what way it would have been better if I would have opted
for Corsair TX400 PSU for Rs2700. One bad thing is that people over here already
call me mad for buying Rs2100 PSU instead of Rs500-600 ones. I went for this PSU
just for improved reliability, performance and stability, now the overall question is
that what's the use? Please explain me with respect to the example system and my
system.