Arock Distinguished Jun 16, 2009 69 0 18,630 May 9, 2010 #1 I want tomshardware to make a competative review on the above two processors..I request to perform the benchmarks with & without HT in i3-530..This will show the actual 2 core 2 thread comparision the two..
I want tomshardware to make a competative review on the above two processors..I request to perform the benchmarks with & without HT in i3-530..This will show the actual 2 core 2 thread comparision the two..
Solution ksampanna May 9, 2010 http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/120?vs=118 Even without HT, the i3 would be the winner
moody89 Distinguished Oct 6, 2009 799 0 19,160 May 9, 2010 #2 I'm pretty certain that the i3 would be faster clock per clock with or without hyperthreading enabled. Upvote 0 Downvote
I'm pretty certain that the i3 would be faster clock per clock with or without hyperthreading enabled.
ksampanna Distinguished Apr 11, 2010 1,284 0 19,360 May 9, 2010 Solution #3 http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/120?vs=118 Even without HT, the i3 would be the winner Upvote 0 Downvote Solution
Raidur Distinguished Nov 27, 2008 2,365 0 19,960 May 9, 2010 #4 Once OC headroom is taken to account i3 is a no-brainer. However, getting a Phenom II quad core (unlocked cores, if you get lucky) for $100 is tempting. Upvote 0 Downvote
Once OC headroom is taken to account i3 is a no-brainer. However, getting a Phenom II quad core (unlocked cores, if you get lucky) for $100 is tempting.
Arock Distinguished Jun 16, 2009 69 0 18,630 Feb 21, 2012 #5 Best answer selected by Arock. Upvote 0 Downvote
Mousemonkey Titan Sep 3, 2006 59,466 17 92,965 Feb 22, 2012 #6 This topic has been closed by Mousemonkey Upvote 0 Downvote