Hi everyone, this is my first post here so hello to you all,
I have a bit of an issue that has me completely stumped. It is regarding the results of all variations of chkdsk, /r, /f, volume label: /v /f etc and the results of the Western Digital Data Lifeguard disc utility. I apologise upfront if this first post is a bit lengthy, I'm unsure which parts of my saga might be relevant or not relevant so I'll start from the beginning....
Fistly, my PC is set up as follows...
Asus P5N-D motherboard,
Intel (R) Core 2 Quad CPU
Q9300 @ 2.50Ghz
2.50 Ghz, 3.25 GB of RAM
ATI HD Radeon 4350 Graphics Card
PC is connected via HDMI to my Onkyo TX-SR506 receiver and then on to my Toshiba 40inch LCD.
I have recently had to replace my old SATA Western Digital 320gb HDD as it was a few years old and had started causing problems on boot-up. I bought a used 400gb Western Digital unit off eBay (budget is tight so 2nd hand was the only option). My local PC man installed Windows XP Pro SP3 on my new drive for me, and recovered the old drive so that I could copy my old data, re-format it and use it as a secondary drive for storage. This setup worked fine for a couple of days but then started having problems on startup again, after the Windows logo screen it just stayed black...forever! After much searching of the Internet on my laptop for solutions/similar cases etc, I was being torn between a display driver error or another HDD failure. I was also unable to boot into any of the 3 variations of safe mode, it would just hang on the list at mup.sys. The BIOS boot order was all correct, CD first, new primary drive second, and the older drive third.
Using my own Windows XP recovery disc, I ran fixmbr, which succesfully wrote the new mbr, I got an error message (that I cant actually remember) from fixboot, and I got the message 'there is one or more unrecoverable errors' from chkdsk. Chkdsk /r also said 'there is one or more unrecoverable errors. This led me to believe that it in fact was major issues with my 'new' drive. Through my laptop I downloaded the Western Digital Data Lifeguard utility, and ran that on boot-up, and results of a quick test threw back error code 0007, and on an extended test threw back error code 0225, which says 'too many errors' please see here for the error codes and there meanings....
http://support.wdc.com/techinfo/general/errorcodes.asp
....the error code 0007 refers to a problem with the SMART monitoring, I get this message wether SMART is enabled OR disabled in the BIOS.
So there I was, 2am and sat staring at a seemingly completely knackered PC, again!! After only getting it back two days previous! I then remembered a thread I had read somewhere, where someone had said to try swapping the SATA cable with a new one, and I had a new one that my local PC man had installed to connect the old drive as a secondary unit. So I disconnected the old unit, used that new cable to connect the primary drive to the motherboard and boom! Booted up first time faultlessly, and noticably quicker than before! I couldnt believe it! So my theory was at that point, it was a dodgy cable! Couldnt quite understand how I could get such serious errors from a HDD diagnostics utility because of a dodgy cable but hey, it worked so I was happy. So I went back to the PC shop and bought another new SATA cable to reconnect my older HDD back up again, but as soon as I did, it wouldnt boot up again, same characteristics as before, after Windows logo screen it just hung on a black screen. So the problem wasnt the SATA cable, it was something to do with the old drive being connected. I ran the WD diagnostics on the old HDD after it had been reformatted and it came back completely clean, no errors or bad sectors found!
So, the system seems to work flawlessly without the old drive plugged in, but just out of interest I had to see if, now its all working fine without the old HDD, will the results of chkdsk and its variations be any different for the 'new' HDD. Yes they were, I ran all chkdsk variations and all came back clear, not one bad sector anywhere. I read on a Microsoft site that sometimes chkdsk will not find any errors on an NTFS drive, healthy or not, and to run chkdsk volume_label: /v /f from boot, which I did, this also returned no errors. So I then ran the WD Diagnostics utility again to make sure the drive is ok, but no, the error messages still appear, on quick test it throws back the 0007 error code and on extended test throws me the 0225 code, meaning too many errors to recover from!!!
So chkdsk says im totally fine with no errors at all and WD Diagnostics says my drive is fit only for the bin, but yet the system seems to run perfectly with no issues at all now the old drive isnt plugged in!!
I am again very sorry for the long, rambling post, can anyone enlighten me as to any possible reasons these messages are so conflicting?
Thanks in advance,
Steve
I have a bit of an issue that has me completely stumped. It is regarding the results of all variations of chkdsk, /r, /f, volume label: /v /f etc and the results of the Western Digital Data Lifeguard disc utility. I apologise upfront if this first post is a bit lengthy, I'm unsure which parts of my saga might be relevant or not relevant so I'll start from the beginning....
Fistly, my PC is set up as follows...
Asus P5N-D motherboard,
Intel (R) Core 2 Quad CPU
Q9300 @ 2.50Ghz
2.50 Ghz, 3.25 GB of RAM
ATI HD Radeon 4350 Graphics Card
PC is connected via HDMI to my Onkyo TX-SR506 receiver and then on to my Toshiba 40inch LCD.
I have recently had to replace my old SATA Western Digital 320gb HDD as it was a few years old and had started causing problems on boot-up. I bought a used 400gb Western Digital unit off eBay (budget is tight so 2nd hand was the only option). My local PC man installed Windows XP Pro SP3 on my new drive for me, and recovered the old drive so that I could copy my old data, re-format it and use it as a secondary drive for storage. This setup worked fine for a couple of days but then started having problems on startup again, after the Windows logo screen it just stayed black...forever! After much searching of the Internet on my laptop for solutions/similar cases etc, I was being torn between a display driver error or another HDD failure. I was also unable to boot into any of the 3 variations of safe mode, it would just hang on the list at mup.sys. The BIOS boot order was all correct, CD first, new primary drive second, and the older drive third.
Using my own Windows XP recovery disc, I ran fixmbr, which succesfully wrote the new mbr, I got an error message (that I cant actually remember) from fixboot, and I got the message 'there is one or more unrecoverable errors' from chkdsk. Chkdsk /r also said 'there is one or more unrecoverable errors. This led me to believe that it in fact was major issues with my 'new' drive. Through my laptop I downloaded the Western Digital Data Lifeguard utility, and ran that on boot-up, and results of a quick test threw back error code 0007, and on an extended test threw back error code 0225, which says 'too many errors' please see here for the error codes and there meanings....
http://support.wdc.com/techinfo/general/errorcodes.asp
....the error code 0007 refers to a problem with the SMART monitoring, I get this message wether SMART is enabled OR disabled in the BIOS.
So there I was, 2am and sat staring at a seemingly completely knackered PC, again!! After only getting it back two days previous! I then remembered a thread I had read somewhere, where someone had said to try swapping the SATA cable with a new one, and I had a new one that my local PC man had installed to connect the old drive as a secondary unit. So I disconnected the old unit, used that new cable to connect the primary drive to the motherboard and boom! Booted up first time faultlessly, and noticably quicker than before! I couldnt believe it! So my theory was at that point, it was a dodgy cable! Couldnt quite understand how I could get such serious errors from a HDD diagnostics utility because of a dodgy cable but hey, it worked so I was happy. So I went back to the PC shop and bought another new SATA cable to reconnect my older HDD back up again, but as soon as I did, it wouldnt boot up again, same characteristics as before, after Windows logo screen it just hung on a black screen. So the problem wasnt the SATA cable, it was something to do with the old drive being connected. I ran the WD diagnostics on the old HDD after it had been reformatted and it came back completely clean, no errors or bad sectors found!
So, the system seems to work flawlessly without the old drive plugged in, but just out of interest I had to see if, now its all working fine without the old HDD, will the results of chkdsk and its variations be any different for the 'new' HDD. Yes they were, I ran all chkdsk variations and all came back clear, not one bad sector anywhere. I read on a Microsoft site that sometimes chkdsk will not find any errors on an NTFS drive, healthy or not, and to run chkdsk volume_label: /v /f from boot, which I did, this also returned no errors. So I then ran the WD Diagnostics utility again to make sure the drive is ok, but no, the error messages still appear, on quick test it throws back the 0007 error code and on extended test throws me the 0225 code, meaning too many errors to recover from!!!
So chkdsk says im totally fine with no errors at all and WD Diagnostics says my drive is fit only for the bin, but yet the system seems to run perfectly with no issues at all now the old drive isnt plugged in!!
I am again very sorry for the long, rambling post, can anyone enlighten me as to any possible reasons these messages are so conflicting?
Thanks in advance,
Steve