Ati 4850 better than the 9800gt?

I currently have a bfg 9800gt( http://www.newegg.com/product/product.aspx?Item=N82E16814143187 ). It is actually lower powered core clock and shader clock because of the 'ecointelligence' thing.
Would an ati radeon 4850 be better than it? What about a 4830?

I am highly considering getting a 4850 or even a 4830 if they are better performance.
4 answers Last reply
More about 4850 9800gt
  1. A 4850 performs similar to a GTS250 which is a 9800GTX+. While the 4850 would provide better performance i dont think that it would be worth the upgrade. A 4870/5770 or GTX260 would provide you a decent benefit though.

    The hierarchy chart puts a 9800GT equal to a 4830, and two tiers below a 4850. You wont see a very significant difference unless its about 3 tiers or more away on the hierarchy chart so i would definitely save up a bit more and get a 5770 when they drop in price a little bit.

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-gaming-graphics-card,2544-7.html
  2. Yes, it is better. The 9800GT ECO is a very striped edition of the 9800GT in order to get power requirements under 76W.
  3. Yes the 4850 is better than the 9800GT by a significant amount. Of course, it uses more power tho, especially compared to low power "eco" 9800GT.
  4. i have never used the low power version of the 9800GT, I assume its similar to a 9600GT.

    but I have owned or do own the following Nvidia cards.

    9600GT factory OC
    9800GT
    GTS 250

    the GTS 250 gives similar performance to the ATI 4850 and I would not recommended upgrading from a 9800GT to a GTS 250. I suggest the next higher card, GTX 260 or ATI 4870. The performance increase you get from going one tier to the next is not that substantial in real game play.
Ask a new question

Read More

Graphics Cards Shader Clock ATI Graphics Product