Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
Hi, I am helping a friend upgrade his compaq presario 1700T laptop.
I was very confused with each memory site (crucial, kingston, etc)
listing both 100mhz and a 133mhz versions of the ram, and not saying
anything about compatibility. Is there some reason for choosing the
100mhz ram?
I ordered from Crucial who had a 512 133mhz chip - they have since
quit carrying it. With the chip installed the laptop would not post,
with the ram installed in either slot. I tried the ram by itself in
each slot, and with the existing ram in both combinations. With the
old ram in the opposite spot, it would post, and then give me an
extended memory error. I thought the chip was defective and returned
it to get a new chip. After receiving it, it had the same problem.
It could just be another defective chip, but I don't want to do the
whole RMA thing again if I am missing something, and it doesn't seem
likely to get two defective chips in a row.
Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
Fred,
I had a similar problem with a 1720US. The supplier and I did the
backand forth with several different source 256*100 &133 boards and
finally one worked.
Good Luck
Matt Colie
Fred wrote:
> Hi, I am helping a friend upgrade his compaq presario 1700T laptop.
>
> I was very confused with each memory site (crucial, kingston, etc)
> listing both 100mhz and a 133mhz versions of the ram, and not saying
> anything about compatibility. Is there some reason for choosing the
> 100mhz ram?
>
> I ordered from Crucial who had a 512 133mhz chip - they have since
> quit carrying it. With the chip installed the laptop would not post,
> with the ram installed in either slot. I tried the ram by itself in
> each slot, and with the existing ram in both combinations. With the
> old ram in the opposite spot, it would post, and then give me an
> extended memory error. I thought the chip was defective and returned
> it to get a new chip. After receiving it, it had the same problem.
> It could just be another defective chip, but I don't want to do the
> whole RMA thing again if I am missing something, and it doesn't seem
> likely to get two defective chips in a row.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.