I was hoping some of you helpful people could advise me on which of these options would be best for video editing (with Adobe After Effects, Final Cut Pro X, and possibly soon cinema 4d) on a macbook pro:
Option A: an internal SSD for the boot drive and programs plus an internal 7200 RPM HDD for everything else including the media and output etc.
Option B: 2 internal 7200 RPM HDDs in RAID 0 with everything on it.
Option C: an internal ssd and external RAID 0
Option D: internal ssd for boot. 1 internal hdd for media. and output to an external drive. No RAID.
Option E: A better option I haven't thought of.
My major concern here is speed and efficiency. I would routinely back everything up to different external drives not mentioned above for storage. I would love to have 3 drives(or many more!): one ssd for the boot drive and two HDDs in a RAID 0 for my media but unfortunately that is not an option for internal drives because I am limited to 2 and I'm not totally clear on potential drawbacks of relying on external RAID drives. Also - would I specifically need a thunderbolt drive to get high enough throughput for the RAID 0 to really shine? I know ideally I would have program files and the OS on a separate drive but I don't really understand whether the speed increase from a RAID 0 would overcome the drawbacks of having everything together if I went just with the internal RAID 0. I'm also not clear on whether having a drive for the output that is separate from the drive for the media I am working with is more important for speed than the boost from RAID 0.
I would really appreciate any and all feedback on this. Please feel free to explain to me in detail how I am an idiot and the answer is obvious. That would be fine with me. I don't want to pretend like I actually know much about all of this. I've been reading a lot on the subject for many hours now but I was starting totally from scratch in my understanding and I'm still unsure of the answer to this particular question so I thought I would actually try posting for once instead of combing through semi-relevant posts on various forums like usual. Thanks!
Option A: an internal SSD for the boot drive and programs plus an internal 7200 RPM HDD for everything else including the media and output etc.
Option B: 2 internal 7200 RPM HDDs in RAID 0 with everything on it.
Option C: an internal ssd and external RAID 0
Option D: internal ssd for boot. 1 internal hdd for media. and output to an external drive. No RAID.
Option E: A better option I haven't thought of.
My major concern here is speed and efficiency. I would routinely back everything up to different external drives not mentioned above for storage. I would love to have 3 drives(or many more!): one ssd for the boot drive and two HDDs in a RAID 0 for my media but unfortunately that is not an option for internal drives because I am limited to 2 and I'm not totally clear on potential drawbacks of relying on external RAID drives. Also - would I specifically need a thunderbolt drive to get high enough throughput for the RAID 0 to really shine? I know ideally I would have program files and the OS on a separate drive but I don't really understand whether the speed increase from a RAID 0 would overcome the drawbacks of having everything together if I went just with the internal RAID 0. I'm also not clear on whether having a drive for the output that is separate from the drive for the media I am working with is more important for speed than the boost from RAID 0.
I would really appreciate any and all feedback on this. Please feel free to explain to me in detail how I am an idiot and the answer is obvious. That would be fine with me. I don't want to pretend like I actually know much about all of this. I've been reading a lot on the subject for many hours now but I was starting totally from scratch in my understanding and I'm still unsure of the answer to this particular question so I thought I would actually try posting for once instead of combing through semi-relevant posts on various forums like usual. Thanks!