Indeed, does look like the raid0 improves the random 4 K (looked at AS SSD review as I do NOT place much stock in ATTO benchmark) will need to look to see if I can find some results using PC Vantage. I know that in mechanical drives, Raid0 does NOT improve access time and only a small gain in random 4K. Benchmartks are one thing, and real-world usage do not always fall hand in hand - reason I prefer PCMark vantage test based on apps that I use. The only use for ATTO is to compare your performance to manuf specs.
Trim and lack off trim seems to effect drives differently, dependent on usage and on How CG is implimented. There have been several post, and some mention in reviews, that you MAY (key word) have to let the drive sit idle for several hours for CG to effectively bring a drive that has reduced it's performance back to Normal performance.
PS you did notice they were comparing a Intel 520 240 Gig drives (one raid0, one not), I doudt that a pair of 60 gig dives will score equally as well.
Added: Trim support for member drive of raid0 (applies only to intel chipsets) may NOt be to far off in the future.
http://news.softpedia.com/news/SSDs-in-RAID-Get-TRIM-Don-t-Lose-Performance-Anymore-235606.shtml
Also caught this "Solid state drives are a rather bad choice for RAID setups"
Another reference:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/storage/display/kigston-hyperx-ssd-raid0_5.html#sect0
Using Pc mark7 there is an advantage to Raid0, Using a Kingston 120 gig. 2 in raid0 yields a wapping 4.2 % increase, and when comparing a 240 gig drive to 2 x 120 in raid0 the diff drops to 2.31 % - Doudt thats enough to notice.
From Conclussion:
Quote
Thus, a RAID0 will only be superior to a single SSD at linear operations whereas random-address operations will expose its weakness. That’s why we can’t prefer the RAID0 solution to a single SSD without reservations. On the other hand, most of our lifelike benchmarks do show the RAID0 to be overall faster. In other words, the RAID0 is better on average, especially as it doesn’t involve any investment: the cost per gigabyte is the same for a RAID0 and an SSD of the same capacity.
There is some inconvenience about running an SSD RAID0 that should also be mentioned.
You cannot monitor the health of your SSDs in a RAID0 or update their firmware. A RAID0 will also have lower reliability since a failure of any SSD causes the loss of all data stored on all the SSDs in the array.
End Quote.