Hi all,
I'm trying to pick a 240GB SSD SATA3 drive to put two of them in RAID0 on my x79 system.
I see that "KINGSTON SH100S3240G" is top ten at www.harddrivebenchmark.net (PassMark)
Does anyone know what the difference is between:
KINGSTON HyperX 3K SSD, 240GB (SH103S3/240G)
2.5", 240GB Flash, MLC, read: 555 MB/s, write: 510 MB/s, SSD controller: SandForce SF-2281 • SATA III 6.0Gb/s
and
KINGSTON HyperX SSD, 240GB (SH100S3/240G)
2.5", 240GB Flash, MLC, read: 555 MB/s, write: 510 MB/s, SSD controller: SandForce SF-2281 • SATA III 6.0Gb/s
The "3K" version is about 20% cheaper, but the stats all look identical.
Why would you ever buy the non-3k version, does it have any advantage that I am not seeing?
Thanks,
Andrew.
I'm trying to pick a 240GB SSD SATA3 drive to put two of them in RAID0 on my x79 system.
I see that "KINGSTON SH100S3240G" is top ten at www.harddrivebenchmark.net (PassMark)
Does anyone know what the difference is between:
KINGSTON HyperX 3K SSD, 240GB (SH103S3/240G)
2.5", 240GB Flash, MLC, read: 555 MB/s, write: 510 MB/s, SSD controller: SandForce SF-2281 • SATA III 6.0Gb/s
and
KINGSTON HyperX SSD, 240GB (SH100S3/240G)
2.5", 240GB Flash, MLC, read: 555 MB/s, write: 510 MB/s, SSD controller: SandForce SF-2281 • SATA III 6.0Gb/s
The "3K" version is about 20% cheaper, but the stats all look identical.
Why would you ever buy the non-3k version, does it have any advantage that I am not seeing?
Thanks,
Andrew.