Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Best Gaming CPU Bang for your Back in $200 range

Tags:
Last response: in CPUs
Share

just oc the thuban to 3.4ghz and itll perform equally to the i5 and 965 in gaming, and probably beat them in rts's or any other very multi threaded game. Overclocking the thuban wont be hard, you wont even have to increase voltage. So all in all the 1055t is the best 'band for your back.'
Related ressources

Both processors are more than you need to properly game. All you really need is an Athlon II x3 ( http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/athlon-ii-x3-440-ga... ).

The cost for the two processors is about the same, but I would still go for the Phenom. The upgrade path on AM3 is much better, and AMD motherboards are cheaper at the moment. Either way, you will need a new motherboard. With AMD, you could get an AM2+ motherboard that supports DDR2 and keep some components. The 1055t also has a slightly higher native clock speed. If you have a large budget, by all means, get the i5, which has more logical cores, and is a more efficient (32nm) chip.

If you are just upgrading the CPU, you will see very little difference in most games, which have a larger graphics bottleneck than a CPU bottleneck. I would upgrade my graphics before my CPU if I had a capable CPU like yours. Just my $0.02.

Good luck choosing a processor for your build.

user 18 said:
Both processors are more than you need to properly game. All you really need is an Athlon II x3 ( http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/athlon-ii-x3-440-ga... ).

The cost for the two processors is about the same, but I would still go for the Phenom. The upgrade path on AM3 is much better, and AMD motherboards are cheaper at the moment. Either way, you will need a new motherboard. With AMD, you could get an AM2+ motherboard that supports DDR2 and keep some components. The 1055t also has a slightly higher native clock speed. If you have a large budget, by all means, get the i5, which has more logical cores, and is a more efficient (32nm) chip.

If you are just upgrading the CPU, you will see very little difference in most games, which have a larger graphics bottleneck than a CPU bottleneck. I would upgrade my graphics before my CPU if I had a capable CPU like yours. Just my $0.02.

Good luck choosing a processor for your build.

The i5 doesn't have hyperthreading so it doesnt have more logical cores. The quad core i5s are also 45nm, only the dual cores are 32nm.

i5 750 and 965 be would both be fine choices. Unless you're looking to go multi GPU, I don't think HT would mean anything. Also, any quad core will do you well and unless you play games like ARMA II or SupCom, your CPU isn't a big issue so long as it's a quad. I'd personally go with the AMD because I have a sneaking suspicion that the 1156 socket will be phased because of intel's annoying tendency to change sockets....

Sorry about that - I did read somewhere that they did have HT, thanks yannifb for the correction. In that case, my post should read:

Both processors are more than you need to properly game. All you really need is an Athlon II x3 ( http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/athlon-ii-x3-440-ga... )

The cost for the two processors is about the same, but I would still go for the Phenom. The upgrade path on AM3 is much better, and AMD motherboards are cheaper at the moment. Either way, you will need a new motherboard. With AMD, you could get an AM2+ motherboard that supports DDR2 and keep some components. The 1055t also has a slightly higher native clock speed. If you have a large budget, by all means, get the i5, it's a great chip.

If you are just upgrading the CPU, you will see very little difference in most games, which have a larger graphics bottleneck than a CPU bottleneck. I would upgrade my graphics before my CPU if I had a capable CPU like yours. Just my $0.02.

Good luck choosing a processor for your build.


Edit: Broken Link

ladic said:
if I am upgrading from a C2D 8400 (3ghz) and radeon HD4870 512mb, would that upgrade to i5 750 make a noticeable performance difference or not?



DO you overclock ? can you overclock ? if so get a graphics card with more memory. sell the 4870 get a 5850.
Turn up the GHZ on the E8400 you are all done. don't bother upgrading CPU for games

don't OC, not sure how, and I find those guides a bit confusing when I've tried.

From what I read the 5850 actually performs worse in some cases thatn a 4870, but it has the advantage of being directx11

If you were willing to spend ~$200 on a CPU, you should be willing to spend a similar amount on a GPU, and will get more gaming performance for your money. If you want to spend a bit less or more, you could read this article on best gaming GPUs for the money:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/graphics-card-gefor...

Very nicely divided based on price increments of $20 to $40 in the sub-$250 category.


One word of caution. If you do buy a high-quality card like a 5700-5900 series, make sure your PSU can support it. A generic brand will do no good, and you will definitely need to have at least a 500w supply for a powerful card. Also, make sure you have the right power connectors either by molex adapter or direct from the PSU.

Unless you are spending $500-600+ on the GPU(s), go for a Phenom II 955 and OC the crap out of it. Anything faster won't show a significant gain in most games without a monster GPU setup.

If you're spending under $200 on the GPU you could probably get away with Athlon II.

To answer the main question, the i5-750 is the best gaming CPU @ ~$200.
Ask the community
!