Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Already asked and answered :-)
Patetc wrote:
> I just got this program and it appears to have all the same features as
> Adobe Photoshop Album, which I also have. Do I really need both?
>
> Adobe Photoshop Elements looks very good--just takes a long time to
> load because of all the plugins I have. Any opinions from other users?
> Pat
>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Phil Wheeler" <w6tuh-ng5@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ta2td.3139$hd.716@twister.socal.rr.com...
> Already asked and answered :-)
>
> Patetc wrote:
>
>> I just got this program and it appears to have all the same
>> features as
>> Adobe Photoshop Album, which I also have. Do I really need both?
>>
>> Adobe Photoshop Elements looks very good--just takes a long time to
>> load because of all the plugins I have. Any opinions from other
>> users?
>> Pat
It's tediously slow (up to a factor of 2) to open with no added
plug-ins compared with Elements 1 tho' it depends on the file size
when opened to edit a picture. I have 256MB of RAM but I wonder if
getting some more memory might help?
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
James Silverton wrote:
> It's tediously slow (up to a factor of 2) to open with no added
> plug-ins compared with Elements 1 tho' it depends on the file size when
> opened to edit a picture. I have 256MB of RAM but I wonder if getting
> some more memory might help?
>
Likely. The way they design their products, you would think Adobe is in
the memory business!
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.