What Do High-End Graphics Cards Cost In Terms Of Electricity?
Tags:
- Reviews
- Power Consumption
-
Graphics Cards
Last response: in Reviews comments
Anonymous
a
b
U
Graphics card
February 16, 2011 4:00:04 AM
Many reviews analyze the minimum and maximum power consumption of a given graphics card. But just how much power does a high-end graphics card really need during the course of standard operation? This long-term test sheds some light on that question.
What Do High-End Graphics Cards Cost In Terms Of Electricity? : Read more
What Do High-End Graphics Cards Cost In Terms Of Electricity? : Read more
More about : high end graphics cards cost terms electricity
alikum
February 16, 2011 4:13:13 AM
I don't get it. Are they saying that a GTX 480 will cost a hard core gamer $90/year in electricity? Seems like a drop in the bucket considering my power bills are over $90/month in the winter and over $250/month in the summer. Just think of all the money the hard core gamer saves from not having a girlfriend
Score
12
Related resources
- What Graphics card are best in terms of cost to performance? - Forum
- What is a catalyst in terms of graphics cards? - Forum
- what is the benchmark of this Graphics Cards and Cost efficientcrossfire sapphire r9 280x dual-x OC (what i have)vss - Forum
- What is the best low cost graphic card and mother bord for playing Kerbal Space Program and Minecraft? - Forum
- What is the best HDD in terms of Reliability/cost? - Forum
scook9
February 16, 2011 4:42:14 AM
porksmuggler
February 16, 2011 4:52:43 AM
jimslaid2
February 16, 2011 5:20:48 AM
nebun
February 16, 2011 6:09:53 AM
nebun
February 16, 2011 6:11:01 AM
AMW1011So at worst, my GTX 480 is costing me $90 a year? Sorry if I'm not alarmed...Also I can't imagine having 8 hours of gaming time every day. 5 hours even seems extreme. Sometimes, you just can't game AT ALL in a day, or a week.Some people do have lives...
i run my 480 sli rig to fold almost 24/7...do i care about my bill...HELL NO
Score
0
Darkerson
February 16, 2011 6:15:09 AM
Kodiack
February 16, 2011 6:32:20 AM
ohseus
February 16, 2011 6:36:21 AM
compton
February 16, 2011 8:29:51 AM
It would be really useful to know what a folding setup running 24/7 costs. Perhaps one day you could use it to get a "Folding for the Future" tax credit on the books. Maybe Toms can lead the lobbying effort in Washington.
Compared to the 4000w, 240v industrial space heater I was using over Christmas, my computer will have to work all year to match the utility cost.
I second "space heater ftw!"
Score
4
pinkfloydminnesota
February 16, 2011 8:46:08 AM
sudeshc
February 16, 2011 9:31:22 AM
Anonymous
a
b
U
Graphics card
February 16, 2011 9:32:35 AM
liquidsnake718
February 16, 2011 9:39:13 AM
emergancy exit
February 16, 2011 9:42:14 AM
i think the main power burners are the people who buy high end graphics cards and then use them on old displays. wasting money on power your power bill without getting the benifit of higher resolution. that and cheap power suplies. i ALLWAYS see people use the cheapest power suply that fits their needs paying the extra $15-50 dollars really pays off in the long run. i still believe that your power suply can effect your power bill more then your other equipment.
what i got from this article is that it really pays to have a power profile schedule and making use of puting yoru computer in sleep mode when your not useing it. and useing the windows power profile "balenced" and only use the high performance profile when you are gaming/number cruncher/redering/video editing
what i got from this article is that it really pays to have a power profile schedule and making use of puting yoru computer in sleep mode when your not useing it. and useing the windows power profile "balenced" and only use the high performance profile when you are gaming/number cruncher/redering/video editing
Score
0
adamcom25334
February 16, 2011 9:49:21 AM
demonhorde665
February 16, 2011 10:00:11 AM
while your calculatiosna re good and all , you compeltely forget to list what area, power company , and lind of power tech they use. in other words the cost you come up with is only good for people using your power company that uses what ever emans of power they can. peopel indifernt areas get charged different rates , for instance people in an area getting hydro eleitric power , (like from a dam) or nuclear fission reactor power , tend to have much lwoer bills that say some one that is using apower company that is burning fossil fuels such as coal plus keep in mind also , the cost of living in teh north east part of teh states is generally much higher than the cost of living down in missisippi or texas. piont being note very one is going to pay what you list to run thier high end graphics , still nice article though it gives us a starting point for estimating the cost in other areas (if we know where you are located that is)
Score
0
demonhorde665
February 16, 2011 10:05:07 AM
p.s. LOL well great article but really can't apply it to me after i read the part about how you avaeraged work days in , i'm in school for game art design and even on days i'm swamped in work , my video card is getting pushed running 3ds max view ports or the even rougher UDK view ports ( i say they are are roughier because 3ds max view ports only show basic geometry and none of the higher end render techs (those get rendered when you hit the render button and they are rendered off the cpu not gpu), while UDK blows the perspective view port up with full in game shaders , lighting and effects in real time.
Score
0
I like how in the interim conclusion for the "normal user" they say to buy a midrange card to save money on power... cause 20 a year for the 580 is gonna break the bank right? You guys really missed the boat when it came to common sense didnt you? If I buy a 600 dollar video card and play lets say 2 hours a day that's not going to cause my power bill to go up as much as the fact that my apartment complex will not replace my livingroom window which has a 1/4" gap between the two panes.
Score
-1
orodreth
February 16, 2011 10:49:15 AM
kartu
February 16, 2011 11:26:24 AM
pelov
February 16, 2011 11:34:05 AM
shin0bi272I like how in the interim conclusion for the "normal user" they say to buy a midrange card to save money on power... cause 20 a year for the 580 is gonna break the bank right? You guys really missed the boat when it came to common sense didnt you? If I buy a 600 dollar video card and play lets say 2 hours a day that's not going to cause my power bill to go up as much as the fact that my apartment complex will not replace my livingroom window which has a 1/4" gap between the two panes.
Tomshardware doesn't review window installations or poor practices by building owners.
The article was written to find out just how much power these things consume and how it affects you, and it did it very well. We've known for a while now that graphics cards have been getting more and more power hungry but this attempted -- and succeeded -- in answering just how much hungrier they are now. Also shows that ATi/AMD has been a bit more efficient with their power draw with relation to performance.
I purchased the 5770 knowing that I won't game much and that with 1440x900 res (i don't like big monitors) and that the card was enough for my modest gaming needs. It sips very little power, it stays cool and it's enough for my monitor res. Even though it wasn't listed I imagine it'd be at the bottom of the list had it been there.
If this article doesn't pertain to you or you just can't comprehend why it was written then don't bitch and moan. Some of us have 3-4 rigs in their house that they've built. Though 1 thirsty graphics card may not seem like much, when you're dealing with 2-3 in the same household then it becomes a different story.
Score
0
Olle P
February 16, 2011 11:57:00 AM
While this article, like ANY article that has ever been published, is not a be-all, end-all on the subject, I almost feel like crowing about it; I've been urging people to consider things like power usage and their real needs for years, before arbitrarily wasting their money. IFF (if and only if) it is important to you, this article is a good effort into dealing with a highly subjective can of wrigglies. Sure, it's loaded with disclaimers, but it is an excellent start.
It is temping to say "Wow, AMD cards sure use less power than nVidia cards," but that would miss the point, and a nVidia card is still what you should buy if its combination of features, power, and power use are right for you. It's like the bogus "CAFE" (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) that automakers use to disguise their [customers'] preference for gas guzzlers; in this case the HD6970 looks like a bad deal.
It is temping to say "Wow, AMD cards sure use less power than nVidia cards," but that would miss the point, and a nVidia card is still what you should buy if its combination of features, power, and power use are right for you. It's like the bogus "CAFE" (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) that automakers use to disguise their [customers'] preference for gas guzzlers; in this case the HD6970 looks like a bad deal.
Score
0
irtehyar
February 16, 2011 12:05:12 PM
We really care about this for a high-end gfx card? Heck I installed a mini-split air conditioner in my room to keep the room cooler while playing pc games because of the heat generated by a high end pc. This is like complaining about paying $600 extra a year for premium fuel for your $60,000 sports car.
Score
0
hardcore_gamer
February 16, 2011 12:14:12 PM
re-play-
February 16, 2011 12:16:09 PM
jfby
February 16, 2011 12:36:45 PM
I thoroughly enjoy this type of 'real-world' analysis this is theoretically aplicable to everyday consumer and I appreciate Tom's for doing this kind of report... but I don't think this test is a true representation of what typical people will use.
First I consider myself a semi-hardcore gamer: I play maybe 5-10 hrs a week of games, I have an i7-930 CPU and Radeon 5850 GPU and it suites me just fine. I don't touch in a week what you reported on in one day, so my yearly cost despite being a "hardcore gamer" would be about $5.00 or so per year. If I cross-fired, that would go to $10.00... I spend about that much money on Diet Drinks per week... if I was part of the fold-at-home crowd, these numbers might be more applicable, but even then if I've spent $1-2k on a system, spending $50+ a year on electricity isn't going to bother me too much.
Anyhow, thanks for the deligent work Tom's, it is greatly appreciated.
First I consider myself a semi-hardcore gamer: I play maybe 5-10 hrs a week of games, I have an i7-930 CPU and Radeon 5850 GPU and it suites me just fine. I don't touch in a week what you reported on in one day, so my yearly cost despite being a "hardcore gamer" would be about $5.00 or so per year. If I cross-fired, that would go to $10.00... I spend about that much money on Diet Drinks per week... if I was part of the fold-at-home crowd, these numbers might be more applicable, but even then if I've spent $1-2k on a system, spending $50+ a year on electricity isn't going to bother me too much.
Anyhow, thanks for the deligent work Tom's, it is greatly appreciated.
Score
1
jfby
February 16, 2011 1:06:49 PM
twile
February 16, 2011 1:36:13 PM
Whoever wrote this article has clearly never lived in a cold climate. A gaming computer is a godsend for heating purposes.
I'm also completely confused about this idea of gamers buying things that are way more than they need. Are you getting a smooth 60 fps with max settings/AA/etc? Unless you're only playing WoW, probably not. Personally, I need something that can push 120 fps (or 60x2, stereoscopic 3D display) which makes it even more imperative that I have high-performance parts. Maybe my info is just really out of date, but I didn't know that this was easy to get.
Now I'm interested in seeing how these different GPUs compare when running a game that's hit the framerate limit for what the display will show versus running a game that's below that limit. The claim made in this article is that you shouldn't get a card which exceeds your needs because of the absurd power draw, but it has yet to be demonstrated that the cards will drink down their max power consumption when they're actually not needed to do max performance. I guess what I'm really interested is seeing how power scales with GPU load across different cards. I can't believe that when you start up a mid-level game which is capped at 60 FPS, your GTX 580s or HD 5970s are going to going to hit their power ceiling.
I'm also completely confused about this idea of gamers buying things that are way more than they need. Are you getting a smooth 60 fps with max settings/AA/etc? Unless you're only playing WoW, probably not. Personally, I need something that can push 120 fps (or 60x2, stereoscopic 3D display) which makes it even more imperative that I have high-performance parts. Maybe my info is just really out of date, but I didn't know that this was easy to get.
Now I'm interested in seeing how these different GPUs compare when running a game that's hit the framerate limit for what the display will show versus running a game that's below that limit. The claim made in this article is that you shouldn't get a card which exceeds your needs because of the absurd power draw, but it has yet to be demonstrated that the cards will drink down their max power consumption when they're actually not needed to do max performance. I guess what I'm really interested is seeing how power scales with GPU load across different cards. I can't believe that when you start up a mid-level game which is capped at 60 FPS, your GTX 580s or HD 5970s are going to going to hit their power ceiling.
Score
0
trainreks
February 16, 2011 1:40:19 PM
Some of your charts say 13c/kWh, and others say 22c/kWh, This does not make for a fair comparision.
EX: 13c/kWh
http://media.bestofmicro.com/S/9/278361/original/Normal...
22c/Kwh:
http://media.bestofmicro.com/S/8/278360/original/Enthus...
Can you please use the same measurements?
EX: 13c/kWh
http://media.bestofmicro.com/S/9/278361/original/Normal...
22c/Kwh:
http://media.bestofmicro.com/S/8/278360/original/Enthus...
Can you please use the same measurements?
Score
1
vvhocare5
February 16, 2011 2:21:31 PM
amk09
February 16, 2011 2:27:10 PM
This article is unnecessary even though I loved reading it.
I know people always talk about power consumption and all that jargon, and I am definitely guilty of bashing Nvidia for high power usage, but in reality, anyone who can afford any of these cards, shouldn't have any worries about being able to pay the power bill.
High-end gaming cards like these are a LUXURY item. If you are worries about not being able to afford the additional expenses(i.e. raised power bill) that come with them, you shouldn't be purchasing them. Like NeBuN said, if you buy a huge SUV, you can afford the $80 it takes to fill up the gas tank regularly.
With my rant aside, I really loved this article toms, and I'm sure a lot of others appreciated it as well.
I know people always talk about power consumption and all that jargon, and I am definitely guilty of bashing Nvidia for high power usage, but in reality, anyone who can afford any of these cards, shouldn't have any worries about being able to pay the power bill.
High-end gaming cards like these are a LUXURY item. If you are worries about not being able to afford the additional expenses(i.e. raised power bill) that come with them, you shouldn't be purchasing them. Like NeBuN said, if you buy a huge SUV, you can afford the $80 it takes to fill up the gas tank regularly.
With my rant aside, I really loved this article toms, and I'm sure a lot of others appreciated it as well.
Score
0
touchdowntexas13
February 16, 2011 2:29:59 PM
I was considering getting another gtx470 for sli this summer. But now, maybe not. It's not that the electricity price is all that much, but DANG this card sucks some juice.
Hopefully I can hold off until the next generation of cards. For now I can max everything I play just fine. Heck, maybe I should even consider an underclocked profile in MSI afterburner.
Hopefully I can hold off until the next generation of cards. For now I can max everything I play just fine. Heck, maybe I should even consider an underclocked profile in MSI afterburner.
Score
0
Owenator
February 16, 2011 2:31:46 PM
Interestig article. I have found that my GTX 470 SLI rig does heat my room nicely. Part of that heat comes from my four monitors too. The room seems much cooler when they are not just sleep mode but off.
Also, I work at a power plant and my kids need to be fed. So please use keep using lots of electricity. Thanks!
Also, I work at a power plant and my kids need to be fed. So please use keep using lots of electricity. Thanks!
Score
1
Spanky Deluxe
February 16, 2011 2:35:10 PM
Ouch, my computer at idle draws 560W according to my power meter. Mind you that's for my computer, three screens, amp and printer. I also keep it on 24x7 (although with the screens asleep it 'only' draws 330W). At 10p/kWh that's £390 a year if I'm using it 50% of the time and sleeping the screens the rest of the time. Oops. Ah well, it's worth it.
Score
0
Anonymous
a
b
U
Graphics card
February 16, 2011 2:35:11 PM
Even an average electricity consumer can save about 20$ a month just by going to CFL bulbs instead of incandescent lighting... You could offset your rigs draw with that and turning it off or putting it in sleep mode when not in use. Not to mention unplugging all those AC/DC adapters in everyones homes. Even better don't set the AC too low or the heat up too high. Electricity is cheap but still adds up monthly if your being unwise.
Score
1
saladbarsmash
February 16, 2011 2:35:13 PM
If someone is at home playing an average of 8 or even 5 hours a day of video games, they probably aren't paying for the electric bill anyway. If it cost 90 dollars a year, that's only $7.5 dollars a month... If someone pays 450+ for a video card setup, then whats $7.5 dollars extra a month. If the electric bill is that much of a problem, the buy CFL bulbs along with lowering your heat in the winter and AC in the summer to offset the cost. Problem fixed.
Score
0
quovatis
February 16, 2011 3:14:20 PM
tommysch
February 16, 2011 3:26:03 PM
tommysch
February 16, 2011 3:28:40 PM
This is why I am hysterical when power consumption is brought up as a reason to choose one brand GFX card over another. As an enthusiast, when choosing between say a 570 and a 6970 for example, will the 15 cent (their costs, 12 cents my costs) addition to my monthly power bill really be at the heart of my decision ? With the cards at only $10 apart, buying a 6970 for the power cost savings, at 0% interests would take almost 7 years to recoup the $10 "investment".
Score
0
Anonymous
a
b
U
Graphics card
February 16, 2011 4:18:39 PM
Related resources
- SolvedDoes putting graphics cards in SLI really make that much of a difference in highend games? Forum
- SolvedNew High-End Graphic Card - NVidia GTX 980 Forum
- What's the next high-end graphics card from Nvidia? Forum
- Graphics Cards Dedicated Memory, Terms, Impact on Overall Computer Performance Forum
- Solvedcan you play bf4 with onboard graphics instead of a highend video card Forum
- SolvedWhat are the best Processor and Graphic Card for short term pc? Forum
- SolvedBest low cost graphics card to improve on Intel Hd 4600 performance Forum
- SolvedWhat's the cost of a good sound card? Forum
- SolvedLow cost graphics card form multimonitor setup Forum
- Solvedlowest cost good pcie graphics cards w/ vga out for 300W Forum
- SolvedCan someone recommend a good low cost graphics card that can run three displays at 1920x1080 for office use? Forum
- SolvedHow do I know what Graphics Cards fit my motherboard? Forum
- Solvedwhat are some graphics cards compatable with my asus A55BM-E motherboard Forum
- What would be better performance in terms of graphics and processing Forum
- SolvedWhat's the difference between these two graphics cards? Forum
- More resources
!
I'm sure my Radeon 5970+5870 tri-CrossFire combination will cost me quite a few dollars over the months. Fortunately, I've got some pretty good power-saving features in use to lighten the pain.