Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Jon Pike" <Anonomoose@spamlesshotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95B929FC85DA2LessThanPerfectInc@24.71.223.159...
> "Dean S. Lautermilch®²ºº³" <ftlbard@nospam.bellsouth.net> wrote in
> news:10rct1oavb0ha7@news.supernews.com:
>
>> Two in the last four days. I guess these people hate the sight of a D70.
>>
>> http://www.pbase.com/lautermilch/image/37110465 >>
>> http://www.pbase.com/lautermilch/image/37222261 >
> If you can tell that the people don't like having their picture taken, why
> do you take it?
>
You're right. I should not be out in public taking pictures unless everyone
is happy with me. Perhaps we should ban all photography except for portraits
done in a studio. That way everyone will be happy.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Dean S. Lautermilch®²ºº³" <ftlbard@nospam.bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:10re3rss054mj3f@news.supernews.com:
>
> "Jon Pike" <Anonomoose@spamlesshotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns95B929FC85DA2LessThanPerfectInc@24.71.223.159...
>> "Dean S. Lautermilch®²ºº³" <ftlbard@nospam.bellsouth.net> wrote in
>> news:10rct1oavb0ha7@news.supernews.com:
>>
>>> Two in the last four days. I guess these people hate the sight of a
>>> D70.
>>>
>>> http://www.pbase.com/lautermilch/image/37110465 >>>
>>> http://www.pbase.com/lautermilch/image/37222261 >>
>> If you can tell that the people don't like having their picture
>> taken, why do you take it?
>>
>
> You're right. I should not be out in public taking pictures unless
> everyone is happy with me. Perhaps we should ban all photography
> except for portraits done in a studio. That way everyone will be
> happy.
That sarcasm doesn't really answer my question.
It's not like those two images are pictures of crowds with dozens or
hundreds of people. Your first image contains only two. Your second
contains one (and a half). You even said yourself that "these people hate
the sight of a d70" so it's pretty clear you knew they didn't want their
pictures taken.
So why would you, if you knew they didn't want it? Or more clearly, judging
from the look on the musicians face, why would you if you knew that they
specifically wanted it -not- to happen?
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Jon Pike wrote:
> "Dean S. Lautermilch®²ºº³" <ftlbard@nospam.bellsouth.net> wrote in
>
> So why would you, if you knew they didn't want it? Or more clearly, judging
> from the look on the musicians face, why would you if you knew that they
> specifically wanted it -not- to happen?
Screw the musician. He's in public, there's no flash.
Back to the images of bikers. Liked the scowls. Probably not related
directly to you nor your camera.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:25:29 -0500, "Dean S. Lautermilch®²ºº³"
<ftlbard@nospam.bellsouth.net> wrote:
I think these pictures are fine. It's a relief to see someone taking
character shots, It so boring to click a link and see another dull,
mushy auto focused scenery shot (not that I have anything against
scenery)
Character photography has a long history. Would either of these pics
tell the story better (and that's what photography is all about) if
the subjects were posing and smiling?
>Two in the last four days. I guess these people hate the sight of a D70.
>
I used a little Leica back in the 60's and folks wern't nearly as
intiminated by it as they were by the Pentex's.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote in
news:6pGtd.224295$R05.141798@attbi_s53:
> Jon Pike wrote:
>> "Dean S. Lautermilch®²ºº³" <ftlbard@nospam.bellsouth.net> wrote in
>>
>> So why would you, if you knew they didn't want it? Or more clearly,
>> judging from the look on the musicians face, why would you if you
>> knew that they specifically wanted it -not- to happen?
>
> Screw the musician. He's in public, there's no flash.
What an ethically responsible and mature reply.
And people wonder why photographers in general get scowled at nowadays.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Jon Pike wrote:
> John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:6pGtd.224295$R05.141798@attbi_s53:
>>
>>Screw the musician. He's in public, there's no flash.
>
> What an ethically responsible and mature reply.
Whoosh.
>
> And people wonder why photographers in general get scowled at nowadays.
>
That may be your experience; it isn't mine.
--
John McWilliams
I know that you believe you understood what you think I said, but I'm
not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.