I was wondering, which is better, the GeForce 9600GT or the GeForce GT240?
My personal opinion is, the 9600GT is better but I want to hear other people's opinions and reasons
The 9600GT was released in begining of 2008 and the GT240 was released end of 2009 which makes the GT240 very new on the market. The GT240 costs basically the same as the 9600GT, just slightly more expensive. When I look at the exact specs of these cards, the 9600GT seems better in almost every way, in the begining I thought the GT240 would be better since its about the same price but a lot newer on the market, but like I said, when I look at the specs it doesn't show that its better then the 9600GT
The only thing about the GT240 that I can see that might be better is the thing that says "FLOPS" what is that? Also that the GT240 uses less watts, it seems to use about 70W where the 9600GT uses about 95W, other then that the 9600GT seems better in every way from what I can see
The GT240 runs on 128bit, unlike the 9600GT which runs on 256bit =/
You guys really think the GeForce GT240 will perform better, even though it has 128bit and the 9600GT has 256bit?
Also if the GT240 is almost equal to the 9800GT, then its actually worse than the 9600GT because I've seen the 9600GT outperform the 9800GT Its sad I know, I was shocked when I saw it because I always thought the 9800GT was better then the 9600GT til a friend proved me wrong on it, which is why I decided on the 9600GT rather then the 9800GT