Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
I have just purchased a Panasonic FZ20 which arrived just in time for
a hike along the coast. I took most of the pictures with the lens hood
fitted and noticed that on some pictures the edge of the hood appears
to intrude into some of the pictures (see link).
This did not happen consistently and from what I can see only seemed
to happen occasionaly when the lens was at it's widest angle. My
theory is that is was caused by the optical image stabiliser when the
lens hood moved into the line of view of the lens while the lens was
kept steady when taking the shot. Anybody have any ideas of similar
experiences?
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
That's not the lens hood ... it's something else, such as a hand or piece
of clothing.
If it was the lens hood, your picture would have the corners "clipped" or
darkened.
"Russell" <me@me.com> wrote in message
news:3u1kr0111s2r8svunqtrla9b8o6q09o3ei@4ax.com...
> I have just purchased a Panasonic FZ20 which arrived just in time for
> a hike along the coast. I took most of the pictures with the lens hood
> fitted and noticed that on some pictures the edge of the hood appears
> to intrude into some of the pictures (see link).
>
>
http://myalbum.mweb.co.za/uploaded [...] 91f55a/raw /9a5de67a723b4f0e849b43ddb0ebab72_cliffs.jpg
>
> This did not happen consistently and from what I can see only seemed
> to happen occasionaly when the lens was at it's widest angle. My
> theory is that is was caused by the optical image stabiliser when the
> lens hood moved into the line of view of the lens while the lens was
> kept steady when taking the shot. Anybody have any ideas of similar
> experiences?
>
> Thanks in advance
> Russell
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Russell wrote:
> ... My theory is that is was caused by the
> optical image stabiliser when the lens hood
> moved into the line of view of the lens while
> the lens was kept steady when taking the shot.
Anything is possible, I suppose, but why the
upper right corner? I looked at the lens hood
on your camera, and it's indeed "massive" as
the reviews state, but nothing in its geometry
IMHO would cause a shadow at the corner
like that.
In your statement of the problem, you said
it occurred only "occasionally when the lens
was at it's widest angle." Are you able to tell
if that means every extreme wide angle shot
had this shadow, or if only some did? Also,
is the shadow always of the exact same shape
and location?
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Russell <me@me.com> writes:
> This did not happen consistently and from what I can see only seemed
> to happen occasionaly when the lens was at it's widest angle. My
> theory is that is was caused by the optical image stabiliser when the
> lens hood moved into the line of view of the lens while the lens was
> kept steady when taking the shot. Anybody have any ideas of similar
> experiences?
I've seen lots of photos with lens hoods or filter rings in them, and
generally when the lens was wide-angle. Your photo, however, is very unlike
those photos. I haven't seen your lens hood. _Generally_ a lens hood causes
shading in all four corners of the image. The shadow is rounded (as is the
lens hood). This is called vignetting. There are two samples of vignetting
at
http://www.vanwalree.com/optics/vignetting.html one at the top of the page, and another, more severe, example near the
bottom.
Your shadow is a straight line along one edge of the image. That is
unlikely to be caused by a lens hood, unless you have one that is
rectangular and fits on the lens with a bellows. See
http://www.adorama.com/images/Product/US_MMXBLH.JPG for an example photo of such a hood.
If your hood is round, I doubt that is the source of the shadow.
--
Phil Stripling | email to the replyto address is presumed
The Civilized Explorer | spam and read later. email from this URL
http://www.cieux.com/ | http://www.civex.com/ is read daily.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Russell" <me@me.com> wrote in message
news:3u1kr0111s2r8svunqtrla9b8o6q09o3ei@4ax.com...
> I have just purchased a Panasonic FZ20 which arrived just in time for
> a hike along the coast. I took most of the pictures with the lens hood
> fitted and noticed that on some pictures the edge of the hood appears
> to intrude into some of the pictures (see link).
>
>
http://myalbum.mweb.co.za/uploaded [...] cliffs.jpg >
> This did not happen consistently and from what I can see only seemed
> to happen occasionaly when the lens was at it's widest angle. My
> theory is that is was caused by the optical image stabiliser when the
> lens hood moved into the line of view of the lens while the lens was
> kept steady when taking the shot. Anybody have any ideas of similar
> experiences?
>
> Thanks in advance
> Russell
All I have to say is...kudos to the pilot who managed to
draw such a perfect red-smoke question mark in the sky!!
Not sure why he drew the other squiggly line though...
One thing is that the manual suggests that the hood is not mounted as
show in the image above, but rather rotated at 90 degrees to the one
shown in this image. In other words so that the large edges protrude
at the sides rather than at the top as shown in the image.
The reason I suspect it is the lens hood causing my problems is
because of it's irregular shape, but that's just my guess
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:33:16 +0200, Russell <me@me.com> wrote:
>This did not happen consistently and from what I can see only seemed
>to happen occasionaly when the lens was at it's widest angle.
My FZ 20 didn't do that with the original hood and it sure doesn't do it with
the aftermarket upgraded hood. You need to look for a cause in the camera,
besides the hood.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Ok, just figured out the problem after some experimenting. It is the
lens hood which, after re-reading the manual, I see that I've rotated
to the wrong position. When all else fails read the instructions ...
My apologies for wasting everyones time and thanks for the responses.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 20:41:04 GMT, RSD99 hath writ:
>
> "Russell" <me@me.com> wrote in message
> news:3u1kr0111s2r8svunqtrla9b8o6q09o3ei@4ax.com...
>> I have just purchased a Panasonic FZ20 which arrived just in time for
>> a hike along the coast. I took most of the pictures with the lens hood
>> fitted and noticed that on some pictures the edge of the hood appears
>> to intrude into some of the pictures (see link).
>>
> http://myalbum.mweb.co.za/uploaded [...] 91f55a/raw > /9a5de67a723b4f0e849b43ddb0ebab72_cliffs.jpg
>>
>> This did not happen consistently and from what I can see only seemed
>> to happen occasionaly when the lens was at it's widest angle. My
>> theory is that is was caused by the optical image stabiliser when the
>> lens hood moved into the line of view of the lens while the lens was
>> kept steady when taking the shot. Anybody have any ideas of similar
>> experiences?
>>
> That's not the lens hood ... it's something else, such as a hand or piece
> of clothing.
> If it was the lens hood, your picture would have the corners "clipped" or
> darkened.
That's my think, too. It's just too sharp / too well focused to be
the lens hood.
My other think is that it's something internal to the lens assy. itself.
I remember several hundred years ago a paint chip internal to a Kodak
35 MM SLR falling onto (and sticking to) one of the internal lenses in
a telephoto lens, and it was usually in better focus than most of my
shots. :-) (Yes, I had it repaired...)
HTH
Jonesy
--
| Marvin L Jones | jonz | W3DHJ | linux
| Gunnison, Colorado | @ | Jonesy | OS/2 __
| 7,703' -- 2,345m | config.com | DM68mn SK
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
In article <3qacslg87n.fsf@shell4.tdl.com>, phil_stripling@cieux.zzn.com
says...
> Russell <me@me.com> writes:
>
> > This did not happen consistently and from what I can see only seemed
> > to happen occasionaly when the lens was at it's widest angle. My
> > theory is that is was caused by the optical image stabiliser when the
> > lens hood moved into the line of view of the lens while the lens was
> > kept steady when taking the shot. Anybody have any ideas of similar
> > experiences?
>
> I've seen lots of photos with lens hoods or filter rings in them, and
> generally when the lens was wide-angle. Your photo, however, is very unlike
> those photos. I haven't seen your lens hood. _Generally_ a lens hood causes
> shading in all four corners of the image. The shadow is rounded (as is the
> lens hood). This is called vignetting. There are two samples of vignetting
> at
> http://www.vanwalree.com/optics/vignetting.html > one at the top of the page, and another, more severe, example near the
> bottom.
>
> Your shadow is a straight line along one edge of the image. That is
> unlikely to be caused by a lens hood, unless you have one that is
> rectangular and fits on the lens with a bellows. See
> http://www.adorama.com/images/Product/US_MMXBLH.JPG > for an example photo of such a hood.
>
> If your hood is round, I doubt that is the source of the shadow.
>
I can get this effect with my Sony 717 or my Sony 828 if I accidently rotate
the lens hood about 1/8 turn (petalled lens hoods).
Not being familiar with your cameras lens hood I would ask if it is the
"Petteled" type.. if it is, make sure the larger pettals are squarely top and
bottom and not partially rotated.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
>Not being familiar with your cameras lens hood I would ask if it is the
>"Petteled" type.. if it is, make sure the larger pettals are squarely top and
>bottom and not partially rotated.
I just discovered that was exactly the problem (see my post below).
Like a fool I had the petals rotated the wrong way by 90 degrees
because I mis-read the manual. We live and learn
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
In article <MPG.1c23e7bd95fcbb34989866@news.comcast.giganews.com>,
lastingimagery@comcast.dotnet says...
>
>In article <3qacslg87n.fsf@shell4.tdl.com>, phil_stripling@cieux.zzn.com
>says...
>> Russell <me@me.com> writes:
>>
>> > This did not happen consistently and from what I can see only seemed
>> > to happen occasionaly when the lens was at it's widest angle. My
>> > theory is that is was caused by the optical image stabiliser when the
>> > lens hood moved into the line of view of the lens while the lens was
>> > kept steady when taking the shot. Anybody have any ideas of similar
>> > experiences?
>>
>> I've seen lots of photos with lens hoods or filter rings in them, and
>> generally when the lens was wide-angle. Your photo, however, is very unlike
>> those photos. I haven't seen your lens hood. _Generally_ a lens hood causes
>> shading in all four corners of the image. The shadow is rounded (as is the
>> lens hood). This is called vignetting. There are two samples of vignetting
>> at
>> http://www.vanwalree.com/optics/vignetting.html >> one at the top of the page, and another, more severe, example near the
>> bottom.
>>
>> Your shadow is a straight line along one edge of the image. That is
>> unlikely to be caused by a lens hood, unless you have one that is
>> rectangular and fits on the lens with a bellows. See
>> http://www.adorama.com/images/Product/US_MMXBLH.JPG >> for an example photo of such a hood.
>>
>> If your hood is round, I doubt that is the source of the shadow.
>>
>I can get this effect with my Sony 717 or my Sony 828 if I accidently rotate
>the lens hood about 1/8 turn (petalled lens hoods).
>
>Not being familiar with your cameras lens hood I would ask if it is the
>"Petteled" type.. if it is, make sure the larger pettals are squarely top and
>bottom and not partially rotated.
>
>
>--
>Larry Lynch
>Mystic, Ct.
And as an aside, make sure that the wind is not collapsing it on one side if
it's at all flexible.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
In article <ps6kr01eipfg7fhivtoi8hm57jldqlffb9@4ax.com>, me@me.com says...
>
>Ok, just figured out the problem after some experimenting. It is the
>lens hood which, after re-reading the manual, I see that I've rotated
>to the wrong position. When all else fails read the instructions ...
>
>My apologies for wasting everyones time and thanks for the responses.
>
>Cheers,
>Russell
Not to worry, as it gave us all something to think about. Again, watch for any
wind, if the hood is flexible, especially a "petal" hood.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:33:16 +0200, Russell <me@me.com> wrote:
>I have just purchased a Panasonic FZ20 which arrived just in time for
>a hike along the coast. I took most of the pictures with the lens hood
>fitted and noticed that on some pictures the edge of the hood appears
>to intrude into some of the pictures (see link).
>
>http://myalbum.mweb.co.za/uploaded/7ede5f6c-306a-11d4-b417-0008c791f55a/raw/9a5de67a723b4f0e849b43ddb0ebab72_cliffs.jpg
>
>This did not happen consistently and from what I can see only seemed
>to happen occasionaly when the lens was at it's widest angle. My
>theory is that is was caused by the optical image stabiliser when the
>lens hood moved into the line of view of the lens while the lens was
>kept steady when taking the shot. Anybody have any ideas of similar
>experiences?
>
>Thanks in advance
>Russell
That happens to me with the Nikon D70 and 18-70mm lens at widest
angle, when the lens hood is not seated properly. The hood doesn't
'click' into place and can unscrew just a tiny bit with handling, to
cause severe irregular vignetting.
Does your lens hood have the same design flaw perhaps?
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 23:59:45 +0200, in rec.photo.digital Russell
<me@me.com> wrote:
>Ok, just figured out the problem after some experimenting. It is the
>lens hood which, after re-reading the manual, I see that I've rotated
>to the wrong position. When all else fails read the instructions ...
>
>My apologies for wasting everyones time and thanks for the responses.
Glad you found the problem. Not necessarily a waste of time. Actually, in
my mind it raises a question of the design deficiency of such hoods that
require specific mounting. The sun is not always above, nor are cameras
held only in landscape view. To me this would seem to a big oversight in
the design requirements of such a simple device.
________________________________________________________
Ed Ruf Lifetime AMA# 344007 (Usenet@EdwardG.Ruf.com)
http://EdwardGRuf.com
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Mark² wrote:
> ...
> http://myalbum.mweb.co.za/uploaded [...] cliffs.jpg > ...
>
> All I have to say is...kudos to the pilot who managed to
> draw such a perfect red-smoke question mark in the sky!!
>
> Not sure why he drew the other squiggly line though...
The pilot probably knew the entire UFO wouldn't fit in a frame...
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.