Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: February 2011
Tags:
-
Gaming
-
Intel
-
CPUs
Last response: in Reviews comments
February was full of surprises after the fallout from Intel's Cougar Point chipset problem, including retail availability of the Phenom II X4 975 BE and Intel's Pentium E5800 and Core i7-990X Extreme Edition introduction. A handful of prices fell, too.
Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: February 2011 : Read more
Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: February 2011 : Read more
More about : gaming cpus money february 2011
agnickolov
February 23, 2011 4:14:36 AM
wribbs
February 23, 2011 5:33:10 AM
Well as you said yourself you're not counting on motherboards to be available for the SB chips until March so I wasn't expecting to see them return for this month's round of Best Gaming CPUs For The Money. I think they should have been left out as this is February's guide. I would agree though that people building now should wait for their return though.
I also think we need some sort of inclusion of typical motherboard cost for each CPU.
I also think we need some sort of inclusion of typical motherboard cost for each CPU.
Score
2
Related resources
- The Best Gaming Graphics cards for the Money: February 2008 - Forum
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for the Money: February 2007 - Forum
- Typo on Best Gaming CPUs For The Money page - Forum
- no 8350 in the best cpus for money list - Forum
- Best Gaming Laptop under 1500 february 2012 - Forum
fstrthnu
February 23, 2011 5:36:53 AM
fstrthnu
February 23, 2011 5:37:55 AM
fstrthnuI'm almost scared to see what Intel's going to throw at us for the new $750-1000 category. Hexacore or even octacore Intel Extreme-Edition Sandy Bridge? Yowza!
Er, that is, their new addition for that price point, not that it's an all-new category. The 980x is still there for whoever's foolish enough to buy it at this point
Score
2
binoyski
February 23, 2011 6:17:40 AM
Don Woligroski, please!, please!, when you wrote "we already have a story in the works that should prove this definitively" regarding multi-gpu setups(p67 & NF200), again, please!, include 5670x1080 resolutions, not just single monitor gaming. You know peeps using 2x(22/23/24) 1080p monitors for their gaming. I want to really see benchmarks w/c motherboard will perform better than the others.
Score
0
Hopefully AMD's Zambezi (Bulldozer) will reach the top of the CPU hierarchy and be at least on equal footing with Intel in the next couple of months.
Sadly only their Phenom II X4 975 BE is on a second tier (and just barely).
Yes,it would be nice to have AMD have a high performance desktop CPU since 2006 even if just for a couple of months time.
Sadly only their Phenom II X4 975 BE is on a second tier (and just barely).
Yes,it would be nice to have AMD have a high performance desktop CPU since 2006 even if just for a couple of months time.
Score
2
pinkfloydminnesota
February 23, 2011 7:38:13 AM
7amood
February 23, 2011 8:25:57 AM
This is one of the most anticipated articles (along with GPU of the month)
it only needs more info such as:
base clock
multiplier range
base voltage
this is the third time for me to requiest these.
If you have these CPUs during review, why don't u add the info here, it's a necessity for overclockers.
plzthnxbai
it only needs more info such as:
base clock
multiplier range
base voltage
this is the third time for me to requiest these.
If you have these CPUs during review, why don't u add the info here, it's a necessity for overclockers.
plzthnxbai
Score
0
darkchazz
February 23, 2011 9:49:26 AM
philologos
February 23, 2011 10:29:08 AM
jfby
February 23, 2011 10:41:05 AM
That there are so few CPU recommendations is good, and I'm hoping illustrates a point. Concerning GPUs, everyone knows that certain ones are simply not up to the task of running modern games at all, let alone well.
Considering CPUs however, while clearly an i5-2500K will squish an Athlon II (or a C2D), are there any games that the Athlon II simply can't play? There are settings changes that affect how powerful a GPU needs to be, but can anything similar be done to make a game playable on a weak CPU?
Considering CPUs however, while clearly an i5-2500K will squish an Athlon II (or a C2D), are there any games that the Athlon II simply can't play? There are settings changes that affect how powerful a GPU needs to be, but can anything similar be done to make a game playable on a weak CPU?
Score
0
joshyboy82
February 23, 2011 10:46:51 AM
tpi2007
February 23, 2011 10:48:37 AM
wribbsWell as you said yourself you're not counting on motherboards to be available for the SB chips until March so I wasn't expecting to see them return for this month's round of Best Gaming CPUs For The Money. I think they should have been left out as this is February's guide. I would agree though that people building now should wait for their return though.I also think we need some sort of inclusion of typical motherboard cost for each CPU.
I agree with everything you said, except removing Sandy Bridge from the list (at least completely). But I don't agree with the author of the article Don Woligroski either.
The responsible thing to do right now is put all of the Sandy Bridge processors in the Honorable mention section, with a specific note before introducing each processor saying they will regain their recommended position when motherboards are available again.
I mean, you can't seriously recommend a CPU that does not have a motherboard to go with on sale right now, no matter if it is available in 15 days or a month. Imagine Intel discovers another problem (I hope not) and the relaunch has to be delayed again ? These recommendations should be for CPU's on sale now you can actually build a computer with. Sure, you know the performance of Sandy Bridge, but if a week ago AMD had shipped to you a sample of each Bulldozer CPU along with retail price, would you put them up in the recommendations, despite them not being available to the public ?
For all we know, the general public will only have access to the revised Motherboards by the time you write the next article, in a month!
And if the boards arrive sooner, why not just update this article when they do ? What is the problem with that ?
Score
1
kresso
February 23, 2011 11:34:19 AM
tpi2007I agree with everything you said, except removing Sandy Bridge from the list (at least completely). But I don't agree with the author of the article Don Woligroski either.The responsible thing to do right now is put all of the Sandy Bridge processors in the Honorable mention section, with a specific note before introducing each processor saying they will regain their recommended position when motherboards are available again.I mean, you can't seriously recommend a CPU that does not have a motherboard to go with on sale right now, no matter if it is available in 15 days or a month. Imagine Intel discovers another problem (I hope not) and the relaunch has to be delayed again ? These recommendations should be for CPU's on sale now you can actually build a computer with. Sure, you know the performance of Sandy Bridge, but if a week ago AMD had shipped to you a sample of each Bulldozer CPU along with retail price, would you put them up in the recommendations, despite them not being available to the public ? For all we know, the general public will only have access to the revised Motherboards by the time you write the next article, in a month! And if the boards arrive sooner, why not just update this article when they do ? What is the problem with that ?
I don't agree. I think that the list is just fine. There is no problem with the Sandy Bridge processors, and performance is as they say. Yes there is the motherboard problem, but that is clearly stated.
Score
0
tsk_cable
February 23, 2011 11:58:33 AM
bhaberle
February 23, 2011 12:07:18 PM
Anonymous
a
b
4
Gaming
a
b
à
CPUs
February 23, 2011 12:20:39 PM
hollif50
February 23, 2011 12:51:07 PM
Come on Intel! Get your chip-set problem worked out so I can be confident again. Keep your i-7 2500K. A great processor to be sure, but I want the 2600K for my new system... Let's see: a 1000W PSU, blue-ray, a AMD6870; all the top-quality bits. Haven't been this excited about affordable performance since the Q6600 came out...
Score
1
nforce4max said:
You left out the Phenom II X4 820 that is going for $105 on newegg for free ship plus it is a 95w edition. For the same price as many athlon x4 s why bother when you can get this.AMD calling that chip a Phenom II was dishonest. It has a Propus core, with no L3. A more honest designation would have been Athlon II X4 650.
Score
-2
Anonymous
a
b
4
Gaming
a
b
à
CPUs
February 23, 2011 1:13:42 PM
Tomtompiper
February 23, 2011 2:01:26 PM
ScrewySqrlI have a silly question: Why recommend the 635 at $98.99 when the 640 gives you a 100 MHz bump for $99.99?
The prices changed right after we released the list, probably with the inclusion of the new Phenom II X4 820 (which is actually an Athlon II X4, just renamed to a Phenom)
Yes, the 640 is the way to go.
Score
0
quicksilver98
February 23, 2011 3:01:27 PM
hollif50Come on Intel! Get your chip-set problem worked out so I can be confident again. Keep your i-7 2500K. A great processor to be sure, but I want the 2600K for my new system... Let's see: a 1000W PSU, blue-ray, a AMD6870; all the top-quality bits. Haven't been this excited about affordable performance since the Q6600 came out...
Why not go with a 2500K and get yourself a HD6950 2GB? (smarter choice)
Score
0
tony singh
February 23, 2011 3:14:59 PM
mattmock
February 23, 2011 3:18:00 PM
fstrthnuI'm almost scared to see what Intel's going to throw at us for the new $750-1000 category. Hexacore or even octacore Intel Extreme-Edition Sandy Bridge? Yowza!
I am pretty interested in the LGA 2011 processors. I got a i7 920 a few years ago and overclocked it to 3.5GHz. Since then no processor has really seemed like a worthwhile upgrade for gaming while GPUs performance has increased about 2.5x at the same price point.
Score
0
ProDigit10
February 23, 2011 3:28:18 PM
tpi2007
February 23, 2011 3:29:13 PM
CleeveThe prices changed right after we released the list, probably with the inclusion of the new Phenom II X4 820 (which is actually an Athlon II X4, just renamed to a Phenom)Yes, the 640 is the way to go.
Then why don't you change the article ? It's really a no-brainer; you don't have to do redo benchmarks, and it's useful advice more people can get access to if they don't come and read the second page of comments.
Score
0
dranicus
February 23, 2011 3:30:26 PM
ProDigit10
February 23, 2011 3:30:47 PM
nrnx
February 23, 2011 3:32:20 PM
ta152h
February 23, 2011 3:38:17 PM
ProDigit10
February 23, 2011 4:22:22 PM
RazberyBandit
February 23, 2011 6:27:46 PM
I made up my mind I was not going to upgrade to Sandy Bridge because that also meant purchasing a new motherboard. Then I tell myself that because I have an Intel Core i7 860 system the cpu and motherboard are all I need to upgrade. The next thing I know there is a problem with the motherboards. hew! Survived another urge to buy. Well.....err.....umm....maybe......sometimes I just can't control myself....Tom's Hardware just rescued me with their cpu hierarchy chart. The 860 isn't way down at the bottom of the chart. Thank you THG!
Score
2
pakardbell486dx2
February 23, 2011 11:37:03 PM
blackjellognomes
February 24, 2011 12:49:02 AM
joshyboy82Who cares if AMD is on the top or not. The better the Intel processor is, the cheaper AMD is. We all win. Those who want the best always pay the premium, and those who want the cheapest never get the best. Fanboy shit makes no sense to me, buy the best you can afford. The end.
I don't think anyone is saying that AMD should be on top. There are just some who are worried that AMD will collapse, and Intel will control a monopoly. Score
0
adamboy64
February 24, 2011 2:33:37 AM
I love these articles, a good way for me to keep up-to-date even though I don't understand processor architecture that much.
Well, that's true. But there'll always be that group of people who want to have the best of the best, regardless of cost. And good for them.
fstrthnuThe 980x is still there for whoever's foolish enough to buy it at this point
Well, that's true. But there'll always be that group of people who want to have the best of the best, regardless of cost. And good for them.
Score
0
adamboy64
February 24, 2011 2:34:21 AM
Anonymous
a
b
4
Gaming
a
b
à
CPUs
February 24, 2011 5:36:06 AM
Is it just me or are these articles based solely on opinion without any benchmarks to back them up? What difference is there in playable settings between the recommended cpus, given low, medium, and high end graphics cards at low, medium, and high res settings? How about the best cpu for 720p, 1080p, 2560X1600, and an Eyefinity Setting?
Score
0
- 1 / 2
- 2
- Newest
Related resources
- SolvedWhich Gaming PC is the best for my money? Forum
- What are the best value for money CPUs at the moment? Forum
- SolvedBest Gaming Monitor for the Money? Forum
- SolvedBest Gaming CPUs Forum
- SolvedBest Gaming Monitor for the money Forum
- Solved2 almost identical gaming pc's. But almost, which one is the best for the money? Forum
- SolvedBest Gaming Keyboard for the money? Forum
- SolvedBest gpu for games from 2011 and back Forum
- SolvedBest Gpu to play games from 2011< and back Forum
- SolvedHelp me choose the best value for the money for a budget gaming pc (RAM/Casing) Forum
- SolvedBest Gaming Laptop for the money Forum
- SolvedWhich one is the best for gaming and for the money ? Forum
- SolvedWhich one is the best for gaming and for the money ?? Gigabyte Radeon R9 270X Or EVGA GeForce GTX 770 ? Forum
- SolvedBest gaming pc build for the money ? A or B or C or D Forum
- Solvedbest gaming laptop money can buy? Forum
- More resources
!