Nvidia cripples PhysX performance: True or False ?

Nvidia cripples PhysX performance: True or False ?

http://physxinfo.com/news/2747/nvi [...] -or-false/

Interesting article. Just thought I'd post it.

This is a attempt of w*w.ngohq.com to generate hits with bogus inflammatory info.
I will tell you the problem, the game should not try implement physX when there is no physX certified gpu present. The game played fine without PhysX , so whats the problem ?
Here is note for the game.

PhysX (hardware supported by nVIDIA GPUs only, acceleration and additional effects are exclusive to the Windows version)[3]


Also physxinfo.com came to this conclusion about the web site that made the claim

You've read into it wrong. Nvidia crippled the FP64 compute function on its Geforce line of cards but not the Tesla line (to make the Tesla line sell more).

Physx works off the FP64 compute function but because it doesn't need all of the Gigaflops 100% FP64 functionality would give and can work off just a 25% capacity.

The Article mentioned in this thread says......"Framerate measured by FRAPS 3.0.1." and thats a straight quote from it, I didn't know FRAPs was used to measure frame rates as a standard..... actually I haven't even come across it as any sort of standard except for people capturing gameplay to be posted online .....
I don't think I or actually anyone should be taking that review seriously.
Benchmarks are usually based on standard benchmarking software, as far as FRAPs is concerned, a lot of stuff comes into play when you look at the framrate you get on the screen.....
I think it's a bad review, it may not be wrong, but it still isn't the right review....