I was just reading the forums on this site and i notiiced a lot of people building gaming machines were getting i5's. I was just wondering why everybody is suggesting i5 instead of i7?
games cant really utilize the HT of the i7 series, they can barely utilize 4 cores, therefore from a gaming view, 4 cores @ 200$ @ 2.66 GHz > 4 cores @ 280$ ( plus mobo and RAM being more expensive) @2.66 GHz.
games cant really utilize the HT of the i7 series, they can barely utilize 4 cores, therefore from a gaming view, 4 cores @ 200$ @ 2.66 GHz > 4 cores @ 280$ ( plus mobo and RAM being more expensive) @2.66 GHz.
So getting a i5 760 at 2.8GHz is better then getting a i7 860 at 2.8 GHz because the i5 is cheaper and game would only take full benifit from the i5 if i am reading that correctly.
the 860 is better, however if your primary purpose is gaming, the 760 is a better buy. depending on if you plan to upgrade later on, or live near a microcenter, the AMD X4 955 or i7 930 are better buys respectively.
So getting a i5 760 at 2.8GHz is better then getting a i7 860 at 2.8 GHz because the i5 is cheaper and game would only take full benifit from the i5 if i am reading that correctly.
Exactly.
For most gaming, plan on spending much more for your graphics card than for the CPU.
Thanks guys this is really going to save me money because I was going to spend most of my budget, which is still undecided, on a cpu, but now that i know that I can get an i5 insted of an i7 for a strictly gaming and web browsing machine I can use my money to buy things that are more important for gaming like graphics cards.