Hi everyone,
I just wish to get everyone's ( who has time to spare ) opinion on this matter :
a setup that uses
core i3 - 530 - (2.93 Ghz) 2 cores / hyper-threading => 4 threads / 32 nm => cheap setup
vs
as setup that uses
core i5 - 760 - ( 2.8 Ghz ) 4 cores / no hyper-threading / 45 nm => mid range price
OS : XP SP3... maybe W7 later on
application :
perenially running Apache with php / MySQL
almost always run Eclipse PDT ( runs on Java ) , as well as MySQL gui tools
with all 5 browsers perenially on ( IE / Opera / Safari / Chrome / FF ) with multiple tabs at any given time
some CS3 - test flash development
some VirtualBox - [ test some 3 os simultaneously Debian server, Ubuntu Client, Windows XP Client ]
maybe play some tomb raider underworld
the i5 setup costs close to twice that of the i3, ( but will it have that 2X performance edge over the i3 ? )
also, what does the 32 nm vs 45 nm imply ( given the applications i'll be running )
I just wish to get everyone's ( who has time to spare ) opinion on this matter :
a setup that uses
core i3 - 530 - (2.93 Ghz) 2 cores / hyper-threading => 4 threads / 32 nm => cheap setup
vs
as setup that uses
core i5 - 760 - ( 2.8 Ghz ) 4 cores / no hyper-threading / 45 nm => mid range price
OS : XP SP3... maybe W7 later on
application :
perenially running Apache with php / MySQL
almost always run Eclipse PDT ( runs on Java ) , as well as MySQL gui tools
with all 5 browsers perenially on ( IE / Opera / Safari / Chrome / FF ) with multiple tabs at any given time
some CS3 - test flash development
some VirtualBox - [ test some 3 os simultaneously Debian server, Ubuntu Client, Windows XP Client ]
maybe play some tomb raider underworld
the i5 setup costs close to twice that of the i3, ( but will it have that 2X performance edge over the i3 ? )
also, what does the 32 nm vs 45 nm imply ( given the applications i'll be running )