Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
I know that the subject of album or cataloging programs has been discussed
but I am interested in comments specific to iView Media Pro or iView Media.
Does anyone use these programs for organizing their photo files?
And, while the programs come in both Mac and Windows versions, if I am lucky
enough to find a Mac user - how do these programs compare to iPhoto? I know
that the Pro version can read some raw files (a big plus) but other than
that is there a lot to recommend the program(s) over iPhoto?
Chuck
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Wright <nojunk_wright9@nojunk_mac.com> writes:
> I know that the subject of album or cataloging programs has been discussed
> but I am interested in comments specific to iView Media Pro or iView Media.
> Does anyone use these programs for organizing their photo files?
> And, while the programs come in both Mac and Windows versions, if I am lucky
> enough to find a Mac user - how do these programs compare to iPhoto? I know
> that the Pro version can read some raw files (a big plus) but other than
> that is there a lot to recommend the program(s) over iPhoto?
iView Media Pro can easily handle large image libraries that make
iPhoto crawl on the same computer.
I still haven't found a photo library manager that allows me to easily
keep track of my digital workflow---for a typical image, I have
multiple versions of the same image. Usually a set like
1. The raw .CRW
2. One or more .tiff files from the raw conversion (often I discard
these)
3. A .psd file chock full of adjustment layers, etc, representing the
results of my digital manipulation, cropping, etc. (iView reads
..PSD's, too)
4. Various "output" files such as JPEG, JPEG's of reduced size for web
galleries, watermarked photoes, etc.
iView Media Pro has worked decently with this (it can read all these
formats), in that it filters quite nicely, and I store my files in a
nice hierarchical structure with each image having a directory with
subdirectories for each of the above images, but it's still a bit of a
headached but sometimes it would be nice to have something more
elegant.
In other words, I find iView Media Pro to be much, much more capable
and faster than iPhoto, but still not ideal.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Richard Kaszeta <rich@kaszeta.org> wrote:
:
: In other words, I find iView Media Pro to be much, much more capable
: and faster than iPhoto, but still not ideal.
Without repeating everything Richard just said, I'd have to say that I
agree.
But I only use it as a reference for "where things are". I use it for
indexing only.
When I need to edit photos, I'm still using Finder to go to the right
directory, and dropping images straight into Photoshop. Then I save the
edited stuff somewhere outside of the original directory structure that
my camera downloads are in.
iPhoto, when teamed with iPhoto Buddy, is still good for managing small
groups of photos when you need to weed through them for an album/web page
or something. Using iPhoto Buddy lets you have a small library for each
cluster of photos, rather than bogging it down with gigs and gigs of data
containing thumbnails of years worth of photos.
Still looking for the ideal manager, but I expect that will only happen
when I change my work process to match what's out there, rather than
waiting for something that "fits my way of working". Oh well!
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.