Archived from groups: alt.games.tombraider (
More info?)
"Pistol Whipped" <pwhipped@NOtampabaySPAM.rr.com> wrote in message
news:jcdie.24007$VH2.15268@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> In the dead of night, a faint whisper from Dani was heard, at about
> 05/16/2005 09:51 PM, and I could have sworn it said ...
>> I have played them ALL on PSX/PS2... I dunno what I'm missing I guess...
>> lol
>>
>> <eagerly awaiting TR Legends>
>>
>> Dani
>>
>
> Personally, I'd say you're missing nothing! (Sorry McG!)
>
> I'd much rather play a well designed game in shitty graphics than a badly
> designed one in DX9 technicolor!
>
> For example, I recently (just for shits and giggles) got my old "CoCo" out
> of moth balls and played an old "cave spelunking" game (I forget the name)
> ... get this ... in 16 colors and 320x200 resolution.
>
> I played for hours. It was *great* fun!
>
> I would say that I had more fun in those few hours than in all the days I
> spent with AoD (Fx5200 @ 1024x768 and 65M colors).
>
> So pffffft to hi-res, high $ games ...
>
> I want a *good* game!
>
> ---
> PW
>
> P.S. For those too young to know a "CoCo" is a Radio Shack Color Computer
> circa 1982 ( 0.47 KHz <iirc>... yes Kilo, not Mega ... 64 K ... yes, K as
> in kilo ... of RAM ... and single-sided single density 5.25 floppy)
>
Ah, now I recognize the term, Radio Shacks Color computer never caught on
very big, guess because the Apple II had color and a big program/game base.
I can remember playeing Big 5 arcade style games (Lunar Lander, Defender,
Meteor strike [or something like that]) on my old TRS-80 Md III with 48K mem
a green screen, and 2 306K doble sided full height floppy disk drives.
Started out as a 16K mem w/o floppy's, using a casette player to load Scott
Adams text games. Now I have 2 HP P4's, one a 1.3GHz and the other a 3.2
GHz processor. w/256Mb and 1GB mem respectively, have 4 harddrives in teh
slow one w/650GB storage while the fast one has a 250Gb serial ATA drive.
My graphics card in the slo one is an AGP FX 5200 NVida card w/128 Mb of mem
while my fast one has a built in Intel graphics acc 900 w/128Mb shared mem
(Yuk, vbut only way I could afford an faster PC). And guess what, I have
problems with many new and not so new games, esp. those that support only
Nvida and Radon chip sets. 0_0
InuYasha
Feh!!
>>
>>
>> "McGrandpa" <McGrandpaNOT@NOThotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:60cie.89935$hu5.58992@tornado.texas.rr.com...
>>
>>>"Inu-Yasha" <tjardine@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>news:HFbie.23980$VH2.20562@tornado.tampabay.rr.com
>>>
>>>>Does anyone here play TR any version 1-6, on the Playstation? While I
>>>>usually play mine on the PC, I am getting very tired of having to
>>>>upgrade my graphics card everytime a new game comes out (This is not
>>>>just TR either). The game companies seem to be able to make the new
>>>>games work with the same old game console, so why does every
>>>>iteration of game need bigger, bolder, faster, and MUCH more
>>>>expensive PC graphics cards?? I always thought I wanted to be able
>>>>to cheat or save anytime I wanted, but the graphics card upgrade
>>>>problem is pushing me toward a console for games. ^_^
>>>> Inu-Yasha
>>>> Feh!!
>>>
>>>If you have an XBox, then you have a modded GF3 GPU and dumbed down
>>>graphics running in 800 scan lines max. You don't have to upgrade your
>>>system every time a new game comes out. Modern games "scale" to whatever
>>>the min specs are, and most do it very well. Doom3 and Half-Life 2 are
>>>good examples of this. I'm an 'enthusiast' you could say. I want to
>>>see everything there is and do everything I can in the game, completely
>>>maxed out with *all* the goodies on and cranked up all the way. That's
>>>what I like. Believe me, I spent many years playing games in the
>>>"Min-Spec" arena. I made a choice, and as I can afford to, I do get the
>>>stuff to push my rigs specs to handle the games I want to play, the way I
>>>want to play them. Whether they can afford to or not; many people don't
>>>care a whit about having every erg of eye candy on in their games. They
>>>just want the game to play smoothly and be fun. Until AoD, you didn't
>>>need a high spec rig to play and enjoy the Tombraider games on. AoD was
>>>one of the first fully DX9 games out, and that game offers *many* options
>>>for scaling it to smooth performance on just about any rig within its
>>>specs. I'll give em this, Core got THAT part right with AoD!
>>>Basically, I feel there is no need to be upset about it. Happily, you DO
>>>have the option of being able to play your games on a nice choice of
>>>platforms! For the cost of my video card alone ($400), I could have
>>>bought a complete console system and been set for all the games for a
>>>good while. But for me, consoles do not offer what I want
Not even
>>>close. SO... I bought another video card and another gigabyte of ram for
>>>this rig. $600 there for the both. Way back when I had Family at home,
>>>there is no way I'd have considered that at all. It's just me now, and I
>>>don't have a problem with that. But you have to decide what it will
>>>take for you to be happy.
>>>McG.
>>>
>>
>>