Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital Camera General > Question RE Compact Flash and Microdrives

Question RE Compact Flash and Microdrives

Forum Digital Camera : Digital Camera General - Question RE Compact Flash and Microdrives

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

I'm sure this has been asked before and I apologize for the redundancy.

Can some one point me to a site that explains the advantages of CF cards
over Microdrives and/or a comparison of different CF cards in general.

In particular I'm wondering if a Microdrive is a good choice for my Digital
Rebel but I'd also like to learn the differences in the media.

TIA

--

Rob

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

"Robert R Kircher, Jr."
> I'm sure this has been asked before and I apologize for the redundancy.
>
> Can some one point me to a site that explains the advantages of CF cards
> over Microdrives and/or a comparison of different CF cards in general.
>
> In particular I'm wondering if a Microdrive is a good choice for my Digital
> Rebel but I'd also like to learn the differences in the media.

The price on CF cards has come down so much why risk
a microdrive with moving parts? I think DP Review has
CF comparisons.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

"Robert R Kircher, Jr." <rrkircher@hotmail.com> writes:
> I'm sure this has been asked before and I apologize for the redundancy.
>
> Can some one point me to a site that explains the advantages of CF cards
> over Microdrives and/or a comparison of different CF cards in general.
>
> In particular I'm wondering if a Microdrive is a good choice for my Digital
> Rebel but I'd also like to learn the differences in the media.

Microdrives simply hold more than is possible with flash at a given
density. Their downsides are cost, moving parts and power consumption.

Personally, I use a 1G flash card on my Rebel. If I need more than
that'll hold, I bring my laptop and a CF reader.

Best Regards,
--
Todd H.
http://www.toddh.net/

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

"Fletis Humplebacker" <!> wrote:

>
> "Robert R Kircher, Jr."
>> I'm sure this has been asked before and I apologize for the redundancy.
>>
>> Can some one point me to a site that explains the advantages of CF cards
>> over Microdrives and/or a comparison of different CF cards in general.
>>
>> In particular I'm wondering if a Microdrive is a good choice for my Digital
>> Rebel but I'd also like to learn the differences in the media.
>
> The price on CF cards has come down so much why risk
> a microdrive with moving parts? I think DP Review has
> CF comparisons.

Yes, for 1-2 Gig cards, CF is very similar price wise.. In this case, it makes
sense to go the CF route. But if you're looking for cards of over 4 Gigabytes,
Microdrives are still significantly cheaper.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

"Jim Townsend"
> "Fletis Humplebacker" <!> wrote:
>
> >
> > "Robert R Kircher, Jr."
> >> I'm sure this has been asked before and I apologize for the redundancy.
> >>
> >> Can some one point me to a site that explains the advantages of CF cards
> >> over Microdrives and/or a comparison of different CF cards in general.
> >>
> >> In particular I'm wondering if a Microdrive is a good choice for my Digital
> >> Rebel but I'd also like to learn the differences in the media.
> >
> > The price on CF cards has come down so much why risk
> > a microdrive with moving parts? I think DP Review has
> > CF comparisons.
>
> Yes, for 1-2 Gig cards, CF is very similar price wise.. In this case, it makes
> sense to go the CF route. But if you're looking for cards of over 4 Gigabytes,
> Microdrives are still significantly cheaper.


I just can't see the wisdom in putting that much data
on something that small with moving parts. I would
carry extra flash cards.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

There really are no advantages when comparing the microdrives to solid state
memory. There are a few minor disadvantages for the microdrive like the take
a little more power, they are slower writing and because they having moving
parts they could end up breaking before a solid state memory card.

Myself I would choose whichever I could get the best deal on. If you do a
lot of sports or fast moving object shooting and shot in rapid fire mode
then a solid state card is a must for the writing speed. Otherwise I haven't
found the other disadvantages to be much of a problem. Power consumption
isn't as I always care several extra fully charged batteries. As for the
drive going out, well everything breaks with the speed at which cameras are
increasing in resolution the chances are the drive will be too small to be
of much use long before it actually croaks.

For me it comes down to price. Which ever is cheaper. If they are both the
same then I always go for solid state. But I have 5 2GB microdrives that I
use with my 20D and don't regret buying them.

John

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital Camera General > Question RE Compact Flash and Microdrives
Go to:

There are 589 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them