1. Yes, the 2500k offers the best bang for the buck .... the 2600K seems to have a higher OC ceiling tho ... while only 0.1 Ghz apart at stock I am seeing 0.3 differences in most OC's.
2. The overwhelming review favorite is the Asus P8P67 Pro which is a x8 x8 SLI/CF board. The Gigabyte equivalent would be the P67A-UD4. Here's what Anandtech says in his comparison of the two:
Quote:
After playing with both boards, I can only come to one conclusion – if it were my money, I would take the ASUS P8P67 Pro over the Gigabyte P67A-UD4. With the ASUS board, you are getting a detailed UEFI, an awesome auto-overclocking tool, better energy saving features, a USB 3.0 bracket , more SATA 6 Gb/s ports, Intel gigabit Ethernet, and in my case, scope for a better overclock. The Gigabyte board is essentially expensive for what is on offer, in terms of usability, features, and extras.
Personally, my fav is the Asus WS Revolution w/ x16 x16 GFX card capability and excellent power / temperature features. It's compared with the Gigabyte P67A-UD7 here:
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/3795/asus_p8p67_ws_rev...
3. The 570 is a great card .... however it is almost equaled by the 560 900MHz version. When ya consider that the 570 costs $345 (you seem to prefer Gigabyte), the Gigabyte 900 Mhz GTX 560 Ti costs just $215 .... and it can easily be OC'sd to 1000Mhz.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168...
The factory OC'd 560 Ti's perform very close to the 570's. Guru3D uses the following games in their test suite, COD-MW, Bad Company 2, Dirt 2, Far Cry 2, Metro 2033, Dawn of Discovery, Crysis Warhead. Total fps (summing fps in each game) for the various options (single card / SL or CF) are tabulated below:
6850 (371/634)
6950 (479/751)
560 Ti (455/792)
6970 (526/825)
560 Ti - 900 Mhz (495/862)
570 (524/873)
580 (616/953)
6990 (762/903)
590 (881/982)
With the $120 savings, you are more than half way there to adding a 2nd one in SLI.....and, as you can see, twin 900MHz 560's almost catches (11 fps or 98.7% of) twin 570's.....for $240 cheaper !
4. I'd grab DD3-1600, lowest CAS that fits ya budget. A year ago I woulda said do 4 GB only if ya gonna do the swap file and other mods recommended here:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ram-memory-upgrade,...
But RAM is so cheap right now, it's hard not to just get 8 GB from the getgo ... not worth $40 to pay the shipping and spend time ordering, unpacking and installing again. My fav's:
$90 Cosair CAS 9
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168...
$100 Mushkin CAS 9
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168...
$145 CAS 7
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168...
In time the difference in price between CAS 7 and 9 should drop when CAS 6 arrives but for now, you will have to decide whether the $50 or so is worth the 2% or so performance difference. In a $2k system, that's a 2.5 % increase in system cost.
5. For any single GFX card system, I'd recommend a minimum of a 650 watter mainly because going any smaller doesn't save a significant amount of cash. The XFX XXX and Core Edition series are the best buy here w/ 9/5 performance ratings
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=E...
Other choices would be Antec TP New and Corsair TX
If ya thinking perhaps SLI is in your future, for 570's the best alternative is the Antec CP-850. As joinnyguru writes:
Quote:
It is completely unmatched by any ATX unit on the market I can think of. You'd have to spend twice as much as this thing costs to find the next best thing, performance wise.
But that would need a Antec 1200, DF-85, P193 or P183 case, so the other jonnyguru 10.0 performance rating candidates would be th Antec SG-850, Corsair HX or AX series, XFX Black Edition or Seasonic X series. The XFX model is far cheaper than any of those except the CP-850
$130
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168...
With twin 560 Ti's, you could drop to the XFX Black 750
$110
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168...