Hello Folks,
I am looking into building a computer to use as a Digital Audio Workstation. I've built two others in the past, and these both went well (the days of learning curve frustration notwithstanding...), and it's time for an update. I will use solely as a DAW, nothing more. I intend to use the i7 2600K. All other details regarding configuration aside, I have questions about a motherboard.
I believe the 2600K onboard graphics would be fine for my needs which are a dual monitor config. Using only for a DAW, I see no reason for anything more powerful for graphics. Does this make sense?
With ever more cpu-hungry audio plugins, I want the ability to overclock. I understand that a P67 board allows overclocking but it does not allow for taking advantage of enabled integrated graphics with a discrete graphics card.
I know the Z68 allows both overclocking and enables integrated graphics. I think I will have no need for this. If I decide at some point to upgrade to a discrete graphics card, I simply won't have a need for integration of the cpu graphics for the work I do. This makes sense, right?
BUT--Am missing anything? Is there a reason I might hold out for a motherboard with the z68 chipset? Regardless, I will wait until these z68 boards are released based on the assumption that the p67 boards will drop in price. Make sense? Am I missing anything?
Thanks for any input.
Perry
I am looking into building a computer to use as a Digital Audio Workstation. I've built two others in the past, and these both went well (the days of learning curve frustration notwithstanding...), and it's time for an update. I will use solely as a DAW, nothing more. I intend to use the i7 2600K. All other details regarding configuration aside, I have questions about a motherboard.
I believe the 2600K onboard graphics would be fine for my needs which are a dual monitor config. Using only for a DAW, I see no reason for anything more powerful for graphics. Does this make sense?
With ever more cpu-hungry audio plugins, I want the ability to overclock. I understand that a P67 board allows overclocking but it does not allow for taking advantage of enabled integrated graphics with a discrete graphics card.
I know the Z68 allows both overclocking and enables integrated graphics. I think I will have no need for this. If I decide at some point to upgrade to a discrete graphics card, I simply won't have a need for integration of the cpu graphics for the work I do. This makes sense, right?
BUT--Am missing anything? Is there a reason I might hold out for a motherboard with the z68 chipset? Regardless, I will wait until these z68 boards are released based on the assumption that the p67 boards will drop in price. Make sense? Am I missing anything?
Thanks for any input.
Perry