Silicon Replaced, 100 GHz CPU?
Last response: in CPUs
Related ressources
- Graphene as a replacement for Silicon ? - Forum
- I7 - 2700k OC @4.5 Ghz Help! - Forum
- Why haven't we moved beyond silicon yet? - Forum
- ATi Silencer 4 on X800 - Should I use the silicon paste th.. - Forum
- AMD quietly introduces locally-strained silicon process - Forum
Related ressources:
- ForumCan I run 64bit XP Pro or Server 2003 on P4 2.6 Ghz CPU ?
- ForumHow much silicon paste?
- ForumWhich CPU...P4-3Ghz or AMD 2800+..??
- ForumIntel's 45 nm Penryn CPU : 4 GHz Air Cooled
- ForumIBM accelerates silicon to more than 500 GHz
- ForumDell Optiplex GX280 P4 3.0 GHz Replaced Fan but is it good enough?
- ForumAchieved, 4.8 GHz , ShouldI Go On???
- ForumUnable to overclock pentium d e2140(doesnt go over 1.8 Ghz )
- ForumOverclock Q9550 to 4.0 GHz
- ForumGPU Silicon Lottery - 7950 crossfire card OC differences
- ForumI7 2600K Overclocked! 4.9 GHz !
- ForumSledgeHammer - 100 Million transistors.
- ForumFX-6200 vs FX-6300?
- ForumCpu overheating
- ForumSafe settings for OC core i7 930 stock 2.80 GHZ
- More resources
!
Now that should be interesting! Silicon is starting to reach its limits, and the advantages of this are fairly obvious. Its also being manufactured in high quantities, or soon to be high quantities, due to its capability to make a cheaper, better alternative to carbon fibers. This might do to the CPU what memristors might do to storage. Any thoughts on this?
And yes, but intels Hafnium isnt quite as good as this. Intel has been researching everything under the sun as far as things to put in there. And i believe they were saying a transition to layer it on top of a modified silicon chip, and thats how IBM was able to get it up to 26 GHz. The were estimating 100 GHz total for this process, and modifications to this process and more of this material they said they would easily be hitting 1 THz
While im sure this will take a long time to hit the market, but they have already been starting mass production of this, they just firgured out how to make it 10x more concentrated than before, while IBM was using the old stuff. With this process, Rice University also found out how to make a LOT of it, not necessarily cheaply, but the startup cost is there, but they can make a LOT for very little money.