Hello,
I am getting ready to upgrade my old system. Basics as follows.
Intel E6600 2.4ghz overclocked to 3.0
4GB Ram (DDR2 667, PC2 5300)
Intel DX38BT MB
2- ATI Radeon HD 3800 in the two PCIe-16 slots
Win7, 32bit
nothing fancy on the SATA HD's
I was quite fine in 2006, but now I run four monitors and typically have open the following.
IE or Firefox with six to eight web pages open.
Word processor (WordPerfect) with three 4mb files.
Outlook 2010
Remote Desktop to another PC (just to take some of the pressure of the main system)
Delorme mapping program
Picasa photo manager
Photofiltre grapics editor with six or so photo files
Background indexing by Windows and/or Copernic
Excel with pretty large files
and I forgot when I first posted this - Dragon Naturally Speaking, a huge resource hog - but only used about 20% of the time
Long story short is I switch back and forth a lot, as I do web based research and put together Wordpefect reports with photos, maps, text etc.
I have found my CPU usage is typically 60% or higher, on average (like as I type this) and often zooms up to 100%. Likewise memory is populated at 4GB, and on average 2GB are used (in task manager, 32bit windows only shows 3GB of the total 4GB installed), with it spiking to over 3GB or 100% and a Commit(MB) page file in use at 2.6GB, of the 6GB total pagefile.
I do demanding games, but rarely.
I need my typical setup to run faster.
1. So, do I need more cores or fewer faster cores? Which CPU for less than $250ish
2. Will Win7 64, with 8-12 GB be a big boost in performance?
3. Would SSD drive be a larger performance boost than an upgrade of the OS and CPU?
Where to spend the money?
The various system projects here on the Tom's Hardware site seem to target systems that are far more than I need or to little, without much insights for someone running a lot of programs and doing a lot of switching, such as that allowed by the four monitors.
Thanks very much for any help.
I am getting ready to upgrade my old system. Basics as follows.
Intel E6600 2.4ghz overclocked to 3.0
4GB Ram (DDR2 667, PC2 5300)
Intel DX38BT MB
2- ATI Radeon HD 3800 in the two PCIe-16 slots
Win7, 32bit
nothing fancy on the SATA HD's
I was quite fine in 2006, but now I run four monitors and typically have open the following.
IE or Firefox with six to eight web pages open.
Word processor (WordPerfect) with three 4mb files.
Outlook 2010
Remote Desktop to another PC (just to take some of the pressure of the main system)
Delorme mapping program
Picasa photo manager
Photofiltre grapics editor with six or so photo files
Background indexing by Windows and/or Copernic
Excel with pretty large files
and I forgot when I first posted this - Dragon Naturally Speaking, a huge resource hog - but only used about 20% of the time
Long story short is I switch back and forth a lot, as I do web based research and put together Wordpefect reports with photos, maps, text etc.
I have found my CPU usage is typically 60% or higher, on average (like as I type this) and often zooms up to 100%. Likewise memory is populated at 4GB, and on average 2GB are used (in task manager, 32bit windows only shows 3GB of the total 4GB installed), with it spiking to over 3GB or 100% and a Commit(MB) page file in use at 2.6GB, of the 6GB total pagefile.
I do demanding games, but rarely.
I need my typical setup to run faster.
1. So, do I need more cores or fewer faster cores? Which CPU for less than $250ish
2. Will Win7 64, with 8-12 GB be a big boost in performance?
3. Would SSD drive be a larger performance boost than an upgrade of the OS and CPU?
Where to spend the money?
The various system projects here on the Tom's Hardware site seem to target systems that are far more than I need or to little, without much insights for someone running a lot of programs and doing a lot of switching, such as that allowed by the four monitors.
Thanks very much for any help.